Prova pericial e vieses cognitivos: O problema dos quesitos e dos quesitos complementares no processo penal brasileiro
Miguel Katz Zagury Fragelli
págs. 11-44
págs. 45-62
Más allá de la interfaz: Deslindes y singularidades del truthmakerdigital
Sebastián Bravo Ibarra, Eduardo Estrada Aravena
págs. 63-88
Proving customary norms: Ontology and evidence in international law
Piero Mattei-Gentili
págs. 89-121
Nathalie Mousist
págs. 123-140
In defence of subjectivity: Extending the argument for a transparent trial. (A support on “bayesian modelling of criminal cases as a whole. A philosophical reflection on dutch case law”)
Silvia Bozza, Franco Taroni, Colin Aitken
págs. 143-156
págs. 157-180
págs. 181-198
Combatting Bayesian criticism: A Bayesian-inspired critical checklist for judicial reasoning
Leya Lisa Hampson
págs. 199-223
What goes around comes around: Why the critique of expert-led integral bayesian modelling also undermines judge-led Bayesian modelling
Bojan Spaic
págs. 225-232



