Acceso usuarios
Alcalá de Henares, España
El trabajo aplica a un caso concreto el principio de interpretación de los derechos fundamentales de conformidad con el Derecho internacional de los derechos humanos. Tras pasar revista, por orden cronológico, a los tratados internacionales más importantes a nivel universal, europeo e interamericano, así como a la doctrina que los interpreta (con especial mención a la jurisprudencia del Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos), se concluye que «suspensión de derechos» es un concepto superfluo para una teoría material de los derechos fundamentales y que su utilidad se limita a reforzar sus garantías. Todos los conceptos de derechos fundamentales están relacionados; por ello, se realizan al margen algunas consideraciones sobre el contenido esencial y sobre la restricción de derechos.
This article applies the principle of interpretation of fundamental rights to a specific case, in accordance with international human rights law. After reviewing, in chronological order, the most important international treaties, at the universal, european and inter-american levels, as well as the doctrine that interprets them (with special attention to the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights), it is concluded that «derogation of rights» is a superfluous concept for the material theory of fundamental rights and its usefulness is limited to reinforcing their guarantees. All the concepts of fundamental rights are connected; for this reason, some considerations are made on the margin regarding the essential content and the restriction of rights.Summary:1. APPROACH: DEROGATION OF RIGHTS, A CONCEPT IN PROGRESS. 2. COUNCIL OF EUROPE: 2.1. The European Convention on Human Rights under the interpretation of the Strasbourg Court. 2.2. The doctrine of the Venice Commission and the more recent european soft law. 3. UNITED NATIONS: 3.1. The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and its development and application by the Human Rights Committee. 3.2. The recent soft law in the United Nations. 4. ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES: IN SPECIAL, THE DOCTRINE OF THE INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS. 5. CONSEQUENCES FOR CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.
