(Un-)Interpretability in Expert Evidence: An Inquiry into the Frontiers of Evidential Assessment

• Autores: Alex Biedermann, Kyriakos N. Kotsoglou
• Localización: Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, ISSN-e 2604-6202, Nº. 3, 2022, págs. 483-517
• Idioma: inglés
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • Evidence law regimes across several contemporary legal orders provide a host of doctrinal devices designed to probe various sorts and sources of information, especially with respect to their accuracy and reliability. These legal provisions, however, are vulnerable to or even tolerant towards uninterpretable evidence, that is evidence whose probative value cannot be assessed. This article critically examines and discusses the «littering paths» of uninterpretable evidence in legal proceedIngs. We point out the misinformative character of such evidence as well as the potentially mis-leading impact on criminal adjudication when using scientific evidence for purposes that, strictly speaking, the evidence cannot help with. We identify common causes and possible remedies and argue that to track uninterpretability, it is necessary to understand what exactly it means to say that a piece of evidence is probative in the procedural space of reasons, and how to draw the line between informative and non-informative items of evidence.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) Standards Board, 2020: Standard for Validation of Probabilistic Genotyping Systems, ASB Standard...
  • Aitken, C., 1995: Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists, Hoboken (New Jersey): John Wiley & Sons.
  • Aitken, C., Berger, C., Buckleton, J., Champod, C., Curran, J., Dawid, A., Evett, I., Gill, P., González-Rodríguez, J., Jackson, G., Kloosterman,...
  • Aitken, C., Roberts, P. & Jackson, G., 2010: Fundamental of Probability and Statistical Evidence in Criminal Proceedings, London: Royal...
  • Aitken, C. & Stoney, D. A. (eds.), 1991: The Use of Statistics in Forensic Science, New York, London: Ellis Horwood.
  • Aronson, J. D., 2007: Genetic Witness: Science, Law, and Controversy in the Making of DNA Profiling, New Brunswick (New Jersey), London: Rutgers...
  • Association of Forensic Science Providers (AFSP), 2009: «Standards for the formulation of forensic science expert opinion», in Science &...
  • Biedermann, A., Kotsoglou, K. N., 2018: «Decisional dimensions in expert witness testimony—A structural analysis», in Frontiers in Psychology...
  • Biedermann, A., Taroni, F. & Thompson, W. C., 2011: «Using graphical probability analysis (Bayes nets) to evaluate a conditional DNA inclusion»,...
  • Bright, J.-A., Taylor, D., McGovern, C., Cooper, S., Russell, L., Abarno, D. & Buckleton, J., 2016: «Developmental validation of STRmixTM,...
  • Buckleton, J. S., Bright, J.A., Gittelson, S., Moretti, T. R., Onorato, A. J., Bieber, F. R., Budowle, B. & Taylor, D., 2019: «The probabilistic...
  • Buckleton, J. S. & Triggs, C. M., 2005: «Relatedness and DNA: are we taking it seriously enough?», in Forensic Science International,...
  • Champod, C., Lennard, C., Margot, P. & Stoilovic, M., 2016: Fingerprints and other Ridge Skin Impressions (2nd. ed.), Boca Raton, London,...
  • Coble, M. D. & Bright, J.-A., 2019: «Probabilistic genotyping software: an overview», in Forensic Science International: Genetics, 38:...
  • Cole, S. A. & Biedermann, A., 2020: «How can a forensic result be a “decision”? A critical analysis of ongoing reforms of forensic reporting...
  • Cook, R., Evett, I. W., Jackson, G., Jones, P. J. & Lambert, J. A., 1998a: «A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address...
  • Cook, R., 1998b: «A model for case assessment and interpretation», in Science & Justice, 38: 151-156.
  • Dennis, I., 2017: The Law of Evidence (6th ed.), London: Sweet & Maxwell Ltd.
  • Edmond, G., Thompson, M. B. & Tangen, J. M., 2014: «A guide to interpreting forensic testimony: scientific approaches to fingerprint evidence»,...
  • European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI), 2015: ENFSI Guideline for Evaluative Reporting in Forensic Science, http://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/m1_guideline.pdf...
  • Evett, I. W., 1991: «Interpretation: a personal odyssey», in Aitken, C., Stoney, D. A. (eds.), The Use of Statistics in Forensic Science,...
  • Evett, I. W., 2009: «Evaluation and professionalism», in Science & Justice, 49: 159-160.
  • Evett, I. W., Berger, C. E. H., Buckleton, J. S., Champod, C. & Jackson, G., 2017: «Finding the way forward for forensic science in the...
  • Evett, I. W., Gill, P. D., Jackson, G., Whitaker, J. & Champod, C., 2002: «Interpreting small quantities of DNA: the hierarchy of propositions...
  • Evett, I. W., Jackson, G. & Lambert, J. A., 2000: «More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations...
  • Evett, I. W. & Weir, B. S., 1998: Interpreting DNA Evidence, Sunderland (Massachusetts): Sinauer Associates Inc.
  • Fienberg, S. E. (ed.), 1989: The Evolving Role of Statistical Assessments as Evidence in Courts, New York: Springer.
  • Finkelstein, M. O. & Fairley, W. B., 1970: «A Bayesian approach to identification evidence», in Harvard Law Review, 83: 489-517.
  • Friedman, R. D., 2017: The Elements of Evidence, St. Paul (Minnesota): West Academic Publishing.
  • Gastwirth, J. L., 1988: Statistical Reasoning in Law and Public Policy, Cambridge (Massachusetts): Academic Press.
  • Gill, P., 2014: Misleading DNA Evidence: Reasons for Miscarriages of Justice, Cambridge (Massachusetts): Academic Press.
  • Gill. P., Hicks, T., Butler, J. M., Connolly, E., Gusmão, L., Kokshoorn, B., Morling, N., van Oorschot, R. A. H., Parson, W., Prinz, M.,...
  • Gill. P., 2020: «DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics: assessing the value of forensic biological evidence—Guidelines...
  • Gittelson, S., Kalafut, T., Myers, S., Taylor, D., Hicks, T., Taroni, F., Evett, I. W., Bright, J.A. & Buckleton, J., 2016: «A practical...
  • Heard, B. J., 2008: Handbook of Firearms and Ballistics (2nd ed.), Hoboken (New Jersey): John Wiley & Sons.
  • Heard, B. J., 2013: Forensic Ballistics in Court, Interpretation and Presentation of Firearms Evidence, Hoboken (New Jersey): John Wiley &...
  • Imwinkelried, E. J., 2020: «The admissibility of scientific evidence: exploring the significance of the distinction between foundational validity...
  • Jackson, G., 2000: «The scientist and the scales of justice», in Science & Justice, 40: 81-85.
  • Jackson, G., Aitken, C. & Roberts, P., 2014: Case Assessment and Interpretation of Expert Evidence, London: Royal Statistical Society’s...
  • Jackson, G. & Biedermann, A., 2019: «“Source” or “Activity”. What is the level of issue in a criminal trial?», in Significance, 16: 36-39.
  • Jackson, G. & Jones, P. J., 2009: «Case assessment and interpretation», in Jamieson, A. & Moenssens, A. (eds.), Wiley Encyclopedia...
  • Kaye, D. H., 1987: «The validity of tests: caveant omnes», in Jurimetrics Journal, 27: 349-361.
  • Koehler, J. J., 2013: «Proficiency tests to estimate error rates in the forensic sciences», in Law, Probability and Risk, 12: 89-98.
  • Kotsoglou, K. N., 2013: «How to become an epistemic engineer: what shifts when we change the standard of proof?», in Law, Probability and...
  • Kotsoglou, K. N., 2021: «Zombie forensics. The use of polygraph and the integrity of the criminal justice system», in International Journal...
  • Kotsoglou, K. N. & McCartney, C. 2021: «To the exclusion of all others? DNA profile and transfer mechanics—R v Jones (William Francis)...
  • Lander, E. S., 2017: «Response to the ANZFSS council statement on the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology Report», in...
  • Lempert, R. O., 1977: «Modeling relevance», in Michigan Law Review, 75: 1021-1057.
  • Lempert, R. O., 1986: «The new evidence scholarship: analyzing the process of proof», in Boston University Law Review, 66: 439-477.
  • National Commission on Forensic Science, Human Factors Subcommittee, 2015: Views of the Commission Ensuring That Forensic Analysis is Based...
  • Parmigiani, G., 2002: Modeling in Medical Decision Making: A Bayesian Approach, Hoboken (New Jersey): John Wiley & Sons.
  • Pearl, J. & Mackenzie, D., 2018: The Book of Why, The New Science of Cause and Effect, London: Penguin Books.
  • President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST), 2016: Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity...
  • Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM), 2015: Guidelines for the Validation of Probabilistic Genotyping Systems, https://www.swgdam.org/publications...
  • Schwoeble, A. J. & Exline, D. L., 2000: Current Methods in Forensic Gunshot Residue Analysis, Boca Raton, London, New York: CRC Press.
  • Stephen, J. F., 1948: Digest of the Law of Evidence (12th ed.), London: Macmillan.
  • Stoney, D. A., 1994: «Relaxation of the assumption of relevance and an application to one-trace and two-trace problems», in Journal of the...
  • Thayer, J. B., 1892: Select Cases on Evidence at the Common Law, Cambridge: C. W. Sever.
  • Thayer, J. B., 1898: A Preliminary Treatise on Evidence at the Common Law, Boston: Little Brown.
  • Thompson, W. C., 2018: «How should forensic scientists present source conclusions?», in Seton Hall Law Review, 48: 773-813.
  • Thompson, W. C. & Schumann, E. L., 1987: «Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: the prosecutor’s fallacy and the...
  • Tribe, L. H., 1971: «Trial by mathematics: precision and ritual in the legal process», in Harvard Law Review, 84: 1329-1393.
  • Trimpe, M. A., 2011: «The current status of GSR examinations», in FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, May: 24-32.
  • U.S. Department of Justice, 2020: Uniform Language for Testimony and Reports for the Forensic Latent Print Discipline (ULTR, vers. 08.15.20),...
  • Williams, M., 1995: Problems of Knowledge, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Wittgenstein, L., 1958: Preliminary Studies for the “Philosophical Investigations”. Generally known as The Blue and Brown Books, London: Blackwell...
  • Yeroulanos, M. (ed.), 2016: A Dictionary of Classical Greek Quotations, London: Bloomsbury.