Fomentando la innovación de producto en las empresas nuevas: ¿Qué instrumentos públicos son más efectivos?

• Raquel Antolín-López ^[1] ; Javier Martínez-del-Río ^[1] ; José Céspedes-Lorente ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad de Almería

     Universidad de Almería

     Almería, España

     
• Localización: European Research on Management and Business Economics, ISSN 2444-8834, Vol. 22, Nº. 1, 2016, págs. 38-46
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.1016/j.iedee.2015.05.002
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Fostering product innovation in new ventures: Which public instruments are more effective?
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 7 Citas
• Resumen
  • español

    A pesar de la importancia atribuida a la innovación y al emprendimiento como factores clave para promover el desarrollo socioeconómico de los países, existe un gran desconocimiento sobre qué instrumentos públicos de innovación son más efectivos para las empresas nuevas. Este estudio analiza las características de las empresas nuevas y cómo los principales instrumentos públicos de innovación responden a ellas. Dichas relaciones se analizan empíricamente en una muestra de 438 empresas nuevas europeas. Los resultados muestran que los préstamos para la financiación de proyectos de innovación, ayudas para la creación de redes, para la provisión de información y para la asistencia a ferias tienen un efecto positivo en la innovación de producto. Sin embargo, instrumentos públicos más tradicionales como son las subvenciones y las reducciones de impuestos no parecen ser efectivos. Este estudio tiene importantes implicaciones teóricas y prácticas para el diseño más eficaz y eficiente de políticas públicas de innovación para las empresas nuevas.

  • English

    Despite the recognition of innovation and entrepreneurship as key factors to promote the socio-economic development of countries, little is known regarding the effectiveness and implications of public innovation policies on new ventures’ innovations. This study examines the characteristics of new ventures and how the main public instruments for innovation respond to them. Such relationships are tested empirically in a sample of 438 European new ventures. The results show that favorable loans for financing innovation projects, aids for building innovation networks, the provision of information and attending trade fairs are positively related to the development of product innovations. However, more traditional public instruments such as subsidies and tax reductions do not seem to be effective. This study has important theoretical and practical implications to launch more effective and efficient public policies to foster product innovations in new ventures.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Antolín-López, R., Céspedes-Lorente, J., García-de-Frutos, N., Martínez-del-Río, J. y Pérez-Valls, M. (2015). Fostering product innovation:...
  • Antolín-López, R., Martínez-del-Río, J. y Céspedes-Lorente, J. (2013). Cooperación y competencia como antecedentes de la innovación de producto....
  • Arthurs, J. D. y Busenitz, L. W. (2006). Dynamic capabilities and venture performance: The effects of venture capitalists. Journal of Business...
  • Aspelund, A., Berg-Utby, T. y Skjevdal, R. (2005). Initial resources' influence on new venture survival: A longitudinal study of new technology-based...
  • Audretsch, D. B. (2004). Sustaining innovation and growth: Public policy support for entrepreneurship. Industry and Innovation, 11(3), 167-191.
  • Baker, T. y Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative...
  • Barge-Gil, A. (2010). Cooperation-based innovators and peripheral cooperators. An empirical analysis of their characteristics and behavior....
  • Blanes, J. V. y Busom, I. (2004). Who participates in R&D subsidy programs? The case of Spanish manufacturing companies. Research Policy,...
  • Bruton, G. D. y Rubanik, Y. (2002). Resources of the firm, Russian high-technology startups and firm growth. Journal of Business Venturing,...
  • Cabanelas-Lorenzo, P., Cabanelas-Omil, J. y González-Vázquez, E. (2008). La creación, integración, transferencia y asimilación eficiente de...
  • Com. (2009). Making public support for innovation in the EU more effective: Lessons learned from a public consultation for action at Community...
  • Dean, T. J. yMcMullen, J. S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial...
  • Gans, J. S. y Stern, S. (2003). The product market and the market for «ideas»: Commercialization strategies for technology entrepreneurs....
  • Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L. y Black, W. C. (1999). Análisis Multivariante. Madrid: Prentice Hall.
  • Hall, B. y van Reenen, J. (2000). How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence. Research Policy, 29(4), 449-469.
  • Keizer, J. A., Dijkstra, L. y Halman, J. I. M. (2002). Explaining innovative efforts of SMEs. An exploratory survey among SMEs in the mechanical...
  • Lundström, A. y Stevenson, L. (2005). Entrepreneurship policy: Theory and practice. New York: Springer.
  • Marion, T., Friar, J. H. y Simpson, T. W. (2012). New product development practices and early-stage firms: Two in-depth case studies. Journal...
  • Norrman, C. y Klofsten, M. (2009). An entrepreneurship policy programme: Implications and expectations. Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 10(1),...
  • Oakey, R. P. (2003). Funding innovation and growth in UK new technology-based firms: Some observations on contributions from the public and...
  • OECD/EUROSTAT (2005). Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, Organization for Economic Co-operation and...
  • Ondarregui, J. C. (2002). Parques científicos e innovación en España: quince años de experiencia. Economía industrial, 346(4), 147-160.
  • Peneder, M. (2008). The problem of private under-investment in innovation:Apolicy mind map. Technovation, 28(4), 518-530.
  • Podsakoff, P. M.,MacKenzie, S. B. y Lee, L. Y. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and...
  • Radas, S. y Boži ć, L. (2009). The antecedents of SME innovativeness in an emerging transition economy. Technovation, 29(6), 438-450.
  • Revilla, A. J. y Fernández, Z. (2012). The relation between firm size and R&D productivity in different technological regimes. Technovation,...
  • Rodrigo-Alarcón, J., Parra-Requena, G. y García-Villaverde, P. M. (2014). Efectividad de la orientación emprendedora: El papel del capital...
  • Sakakibara, M. (2002). Formation of R&D consortia: Industry and company effects. Strategic Management Journal, 23(11), 1033-1050.
  • Santos-Rodrigues, H., Figueroa-Dorrego, P. y Fernández-Jardón, C. (2011). El capital estructural y la capacidad innovadora de la empresa....
  • Schoonhoven, C. B., Eisenhardt, K. M. y Lyman, K. (1990). Speeding products to market: Waiting time to first product introduction in new firms....
  • Sine, W. D., David, R. J. y Mitsuhashi, H. (2007). From plant to plant: Effects of certification on operational start-up in the emergent independent...
  • Stinchcombe, A. (1965). Social structure and organizations. The Handbook of Organizations.
  • Storey, D. J. y Tether, B. S. (1998). Public policy measures to support new technologybased firms in the European Union. Research Policy,...
  • Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research...
  • Tether, B. S. (2002). Whoco-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis. Research Policy, 31(6), 947-967.
  • Tether, B. S. (2005). Do services innovate (differently)? Insights from the Europe and Innobarometer survey. Industry and Innovation, 12(2),...
  • Van Gelderen, M., Thurik, R. y Bosma, N. (2005). Success and risk factors in the pre-startup phase. Small Business Economics, 24(4), 365-380.
  • Verheul, I., Carree, M. y Santarelli, E. (2009). Regional opportunities and policy initiatives for new venture creation. International Small...
  • Woolley, J. L. y Rottner, R. M. (2008). Innovation policy and nanotechnology entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(5),...
  • Zhang, Y. y Li, H. (2010). Innovation search of new ventures in a technology cluster: The role of ties with service intermediaries. Strategic...
  • Zahra, S. A. y Filatotchev, I. (2004). Governance of the entrepreneurial threshold Firm: A knowledge-based perspective. Journal of Management...
  • Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J. y Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal...