Métodos in silico y enfoques Safe and Sustainable by Design para alternativas biocidas más seguras y sostenibles

• Arantxa Ballesteros Riaza ^[1]
  1. [1] Centro Tecnológico ITENE
• Localización: Revista de Salud Ambiental, ISSN-e 1697-2791, Vol. 24, Nº. Extra 0, 2024 (Ejemplar dedicado a: XVII Congreso Español y VII Iberoamericano de Salud Ambiental y V Jornada de la Asociación Española de Aerobiología), págs. 11-12
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Referencias bibliográficas
  • EU, 2012. Regulation (EU) No 528/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 Concerning ...
  • Coors A, Vollmar P, Heim J, Sacher F, Kehrer A. 2018. Environmental risk assessment of biocidal products: identification of relevant...
  • Flemming H-C, Murthy PS, Venkatesan R, Cooksey K. Marine and Industrial Biofouling. 2009. vol. 333. Springer.
  • SCENHIR, Assessment of the Antibiotic Resistance Effects of Biocides. Section 3.3, Production, use and fate of biocides, p.19.
  • COMBASE, 2016. COMBASE. https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/life/publicWebsite/project/LIFE15-ENV-ES-000416/computational-tool-for-the-assessment-and-substitution-of-biocidal-active-substances-of-ecotoxicological-concern.
  • Liu R, Madore M, Glover KP, Feasel MG, Wallqvist A. Assessing deep and shallow learning methods for quantitative prediction of...
  • Miller TH, Gallidabino MD, Macrae JI, Hogstrand C, Bury NR, Barron LP, Snape JR, Owen SF. Machine learning...
  • EC (2020) European Commission—chemicals strategy for sustainability: towards a toxic-free environment. COM(2020b) 667 final....
  • EU (2022) Comission Recomendation (EU) 2022/2510 of 8 December 2022 establishing a European assessment framework for “safe...