Socialismo liberal y democracia de propietarios en la teoría de la justicia de John Rawls

• Pablo Andrés Aguayo Westwood ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad de Chile

     Universidad de Chile

     Santiago, Chile

     
• Localización: Ideas y valores: Revista Colombiana de Filosofía, ISSN-e 0120-0062, Vol. 71, Nº. 179, 2022, págs. 99-116
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.15446/ideasyvalores.v71n179.82524
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Liberal Socialism and Property-Owning Democracy in Rawls’s Theory of Justice
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen
  • español

    En Teoría de la justicia Rawls no prestó suficiente atención a cómo sus principios podrían realizarse al interior de un régimen socioeconómico específico, por lo que entre sus críticos ha habido desacuerdo sobre cuál de dichos regímenes resulta más adecuado para llevar a cabo su concepción de la justicia. Con la finalidad de contribuir a esta discusión, en este artículo examino los argumentos que Rawls presentó a favor del socialismo liberal y de la democracia de propietarios como los sistemas sociales más adecuados para realizar su teoría. La discusión anterior me permitirá mostrar las críticas que Rawls presentó a las formas tradiciones del estado del bienestar.

  • English

    In A Theory of Justice Rawls did not consider the question of how the principles of justice could be adapted to some of the different ideal types of political regimes. For this reason, there is no agreement amongst his critics about which is the best political system to carry out the principles of justice. Aiming to contribute to the discussion about this topic, first I examine the arguments that Rawls presented in favor of the Liberal Socialism and Property-Owning Democracy as ideal forms of social organization. In the second part of the article the discussion about these regimes will allow me to position Rawls as a staunch critic of the Welfare-State Capitalism

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Aguayo, Pablo. “El rol del autorrespeto en la teoría de la justicia de John Rawls.” Hybris 8.2 (2017): 55-76.
  • Aguayo, Pablo. Reconocimiento, justicia y democracia: Ensayos sobre John Rawls. Madrid: Cenaltes, 2018.
  • Anderson, Elizabeth. “What Is the Point of Equality?” Ethics 109.2 (1999): 287-337.
  • Barata, André. and Cabrita María. “What Principle of Difference for a Truly Egalitarian Social Democracy? Rereading Rawls after Social Democracy’s...
  • Barragué, Borja. “Desigualdad, justicia social y predistribución.” Gaceta sindical: reflexión y debate 31 (2018): 45-64.
  • DiQuattro, Arthur. “Rawls and Left Criticism” Political Theory 11.1 (1983): 53-78.
  • Edmunson, William. John Rawls: Reticent Socialist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
  • Forst, Rainer. Justificación y crítica: perspectivas de una teoría crítica de la política. Traducido por Graciela Calderón. Madrid: Katz Editores,...
  • Freeman, Samuel. Justice and the Social Contract. Essays on Rawlsian Political Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
  • García Valverde, Facundo. “¿Es Rawls responsable por el igualitarismo de la suerte? Legitimidad y responsabilidad en la justicia distributiva.”...
  • Kelly, Elizabeth. “Equal opportunity, unequal capability.” Measuring Justice. Primary Goods and Capabilities. Edited by Harry Brighouse and...
  • Krouse, Richard. and McPherson, M. “Capitalism, ‘Property-Owning Democracy,’ and Welfare State.” Democracy and the Welfare State. Edited by...
  • Malleson, Thomas. “Rawls, Property‐Owning Democracy, and Democratic Socialism.” Journal of Social Philosophy 45.2 (2014): 228-251.
  • McPherson, Crawford. “Class, Classlessness, and the Critique of Rawls: A Reply to Nielsen.” Political Theory 6.2 (1978): 209-211.
  • Meade, James. Efficiency, Equality and the Ownership of Property. London: George Allen & Unwin, 1964.
  • Narveson, Jan. “‘Property-Owning Democracy’? ‘Liberal Socialism’? Or Just Plain Capitalism?” Analyse & Kritik 39.2 (2017): 393-404.
  • Nielsen, Kai. “On the Very Possibility of a Classless Society: Rawls, Macpherson, and Revisionist Liberalism.” Political Theory 6.2 (1978):...
  • Nielsen, Kai. “Marxism and the Moral Point of View.” American Philosophical Quaterly 24.4 (1987): 295-306.
  • O’Neill, Martin. and Williamson, T. Property-Owning Democracy. Rawls and Beyond. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing, 2012.
  • Picketty, Thomas. Capital in The Twenty-first Century. Cambridge Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014.
  • Piketty, Thomas. and Arthur Goldhammer. The Economics of Inequality. Cambridge Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press,...
  • Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge ma: Harvard University Press, 1971.
  • Rawls, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
  • Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge ma: Harvard University Press, 1999a.
  • Rawls, John. Collected Papers. Cambridge ma: Harvard University Press, 1999b.
  • Rawls, John. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge ma: Harvard University Press, 2001.
  • Rawls, John. Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy. Cambridge ma: Harvard University Press, 2007.
  • Schemmel, Christian. “How (Not) to Criticise the Welfare State.” Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (2015): 393-409.
  • Schumpeter, Joseph. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row, 1950.
  • Thomas, Alan. Republic of Equals: Predistribution and Property-Owning Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
  • Wolff, Robert. Understanding Rawls: A Reconstruction and Critique of a Theory of Justice. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977.
  • Young, Michael. The Rise of Meritocracy, 1870-2033: an essay on education and society. London: Thames and Hudson, 1959.