How to theorize about statistical evidence (and really, about everything else): a comment on allen

• Autores: David Enoch
• Localización: Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, ISSN-e 2604-6202, Nº. 2, 2021, págs. 285-298
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i2.22455
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • In responding to Prof. Allen’s paper, I make several general methodological points: about the use of hypothetical cases, about the point of theorizing, and about the role of idealization. Then I make some more specific points about his claims about (and against) previous work on statistical evidence.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Enoch, D., 2012: “Comment on Yaffe’s Attempts”, Jerusalem Review of Legal Studies 6: 20 – 35.
  • Enoch, D. 2018: “Against Utopianism: Noncompliance and Multiple Agents”, Philosophers’ Imprint 18.
  • Enoch, D., Spectre, L., and Fisher, T. , 2012: “Statistical Evidence, Sensitivity, and the Legal Value of Knowledge”, Philosophy and Public...
  • Enoch, D. and Fisher, T., 2015: “Sense and Sensitivity: Epistemic and Instrumental Approaches to Statistical Evidence”, Stanford Law Review...
  • Enoch, D. and Spectre, L., 2019: “Sensitivity, Safety, and the Law: A Reply to Pardo”, Legal Theory 25, 178-199.
  • Enoch, D., Fisher, T. and Spectre, L. (ms): “Does Legal Epistemology Rest on a Mistake? On Fetishism, System Design, and Conscientious Fact-Finding”.
  • Machery, E., Stich, S., Rose, D., Chatterjee, A., Karasawa, K., Struchiner, N., Sirker, S., Usui, N. & Hashimoto, T., 2015: “Gettier across...
  • Nagel, J., 2012: “Intuitions and Experiments: A Defense of the Case Method in Epistemology”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85,...
  • Pinillos, N. A., Jaramillo, S. & Horne, Z., 2019: “Asymmetric belief sensitivity and justification explains the Wells Effect”, Proceedings...