Los modelos de gobierno electrónico y sus fases de desarrollo: Un análisis desde la teoría política

• Autores: Manuel Villoria Mendieta , Alvaro Vicente Ramírez Alujas
• Localización: Gestión y política pública, ISSN-e 2448-9182, ISSN 1405-1079, Vol. 22, Nº. Extra 0, 2013, págs. 69-103
• Idioma: español
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Development Stages of Electronic Government Models: An Analysis from Political Theory
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 8 Citas
• Resumen
  • español

    Ciertas teorías sobre el papel de las tecnologías de la información y la comunicación (TIC) en el gobierno expresan la creencia de que éstas abren una nueva época que permitirá a las administraciones, a través de sucesivas fases, no sólo ser más eficaces y eficientes, sino también ser más abiertas, participativas e inclusivas. Diversos estudios empíricos desmienten, sin embargo, estas previsiones. En este estudio se trata de explicar el porqué de este fracaso, utilizando la teoría política, en concreto la teoría del pluralismo de valores, y una selección de estudios de caso que aportan cierta evidencia empírica a la propuesta.

  • English

    Certain theories propose an e-government stage model where, thanks to the information and communications technology (ICT) development, governments will gradually achieve not only better and more efficient results, but also more inclusiveness, participation and openness. However, different empirical studies refute these forecasts. This article tries to explain why the e-government stage model theories do not work. It does it by using political theory, namely the theory of value pluralism, and a selection of case studies which bring empirical evidence to the proposal.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Anderson, T.B.. (2009). E-government as an Anti-corruption Strategy. Information Economics and Policy. 201-210
  • Anduiza, E., Contijoch, M., Gallego, A.. (2009). Political Participation and the internet. Information, Communication, and Society. 12. 869-878
  • Anechiarico, F., Jacobs, J.B.. (1996). The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity. How Corruption Control Makes Government Ineffective. University...
  • Arendt, Hanna. (1993). La condición humana. Paidós. Barcelona.
  • (2009). Report of the Government 2.0 Taskforce, Engage: Getting on with Government 2.0. Canberra.
  • Barber, B.. (1998). Democracy and Digital Media Conference. MIT. Cambridge.
  • Baum, Ch.H., Di Maio, A.. (2000). Gartner's Four Phases of E-government Model.
  • Beetham, D.. (1991). The Legitimation of Power. Macmillan. Londres.
  • Bellamy, C.. (2000). Democratic Governance and New Technology. Routledge. Londres.
  • Berlin, I., Williams, B.. (1994). Pluralism and Liberalism: A Reply. Political Studies. 293-305
  • Bessette, J.M.. (1994). The Mild Voice of Reason. Deliberative Democracy and American National Government. Chicago University Press. Chicago....
  • Beetham, D.. (1991). The Legitimation of Power. Macmillan. Londres.
  • Bingham, L.B.. (2010). The Next Generation of Administrative Law: Building the Legal infrastructure for collaborative Governance. Wisconsin...
  • Bingham, L.B., Foxworthy, S.. (2012). collaborative Governance and collaborating Online: The Open Government initiative in the United States....
  • Bonsón, E., Torres, L., Royo, S., Flores, F.. (2012). Local E-government 2.0: Social Media and corporate Transparency in Municipalities. Government...
  • Castells, M.. (2010). Comunicación y poder. Alianza Editorial. Madrid.
  • Chadwick, A.. (2006). Internet Politics. States, Citizens and New Communication Technologies. Oxford University Press. Nueva York.
  • Chun, S.A., Shulman, S., Sandoval, R., Hovy, E.. (2010). Government 2.0. Making connections between citizens, Data and Government. Information...
  • Codagnone, C., Konstantinou, Z.. (2012). Policy Lessons from a Decade of E-government, E-health and E-inclusion. European Journal of ePractice....
  • Cohen, J.. (1996). Democracy and Difference: Changing Boundaries of the Political. Princeton University Press. Princeton. 95-119
  • Cohen, J., Sabel, C.. (1997). Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy. European Law Journal. 3. 313-342
  • Coleman, S., Shane, P.. (2012). Connecting Democracy: Online Consultation and the Flow of Political Communication. MIT Press. Cambridge.
  • Cotino, L.. (2012). La regulación de la participación y de la transparencia a través de internet y medios electrónicos. Propuestas concretas....
  • Coursey, D., Norris, D.F.. (2008). Models of E-government: Are They correct? An Empirical Assessment. Public Administration Review. 524-536
  • Coroján, A., Campos, E.. (2011). Gobierno abierto: Alcance e implicaciones. Fundación Ideas. Madrid.
  • Criado, J.I.. (2009). Entre sueños utópicos y visiones pesimistas. Internet y las TIC en la modernización de las administraciones públicas....
  • Dahl, R.. (1998). On Democracy. Yale University Press. New Haven.
  • Delborne, J.A.. (2011). Virtual Deliberation? Prospects and challenges for integrating the internet in consensus conferences. Public Understanding...
  • Demchak, CC, Friis, C., La Porte, T.M.. (2000). Handbook of Public Information Systems. Marcel Dekker. Nueva York. 179-196
  • (2009). NHS2010-2015: From Good to Great, Preventative, People-centred, Productive. Crown. Londres.
  • Dimitriu, M.. (2008). Bringing citizens closer to Public Administration. innovative ideas Leading to an increased Public Participation within...
  • Downs, A.. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. Harper. Nueva York.
  • Drüke, H.. (2007). Performance Accountability and Combating Corruption. The World Bank. Washington^eD.C D.C. 59-87
  • Dryzek, J.S.. (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. Oxford University Press. Nueva York.
  • Dryzek, J.S.. (2001). Legitimacy and Economy in Deliberative Democracy. Political Theory. 651-669
  • Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., Tinkler, J.. (2006). Digital Era Governance: it Corporations, the State and E-government. Oxford University...
  • Elster, J.. (1998). Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
  • (2005). i2010-A European information Society for Growth and Employment. COM. Bruselas. 229
  • (2010). Una agenda digital para Europa. COM. Bruselas. 245
  • Fountain, J.E.. (2001). Building the Virtual State. Information Technology and Institutional Change. Brookings institution Press. Washington^eD.C...
  • (2011). Report on Social Media. United States Government Accountability Office. Washington^eD.C D.C.
  • Goodin, R.E.. (2003). Reflective Democracy. Oxford University Press. Nueva York.
  • Griffiths, M.. (2004). E-citizens: Blogging as Democratic Practice. Electronic Journal of E-government. 2. 155-166
  • Habermas, J.. (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. MIT Press. Cambridge.
  • Habermas, J.. (1998). La democracia en sus textos. Alianza. Madrid.
  • Hardin, R.. (1999). Liberalism, Constitutionalism, and Democracy. Oxford University Press. Nueva York.
  • Harto de Vera, F.. (2006). Tipologías y modelos de democracia electrónica. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Política. 32-44
  • Hayek, F.. (1981). Droit, Legislation et Liberté. PUF. París.
  • Hedström, P.. (2005). Dissecting the Social: Principles of Analytic Sociology. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
  • Hedström, P.. (2010). Teoría sociológica Analítica. CIS. Madrid.
  • Hood, C, Peters, G.. (2004). The Middle Aging of New Public Management: into the Age of Paradox?. Journal of Public Administration Research...
  • Hood, C, Jackson, M.. (1991). Administrative Argument. Aldershot. Dartmouth.
  • Jaeger, P.T.. (2003). The Endless Wire: E-government as Global Phenomenon. Government Information Quarterly. 323-331
  • Jaeger, P.T.. (2005). Deliberative Democracy and the conceptual Foundations of Electronic Government. Government Information Quarterly. 702-719
  • Jarvis, J.. (2012). Partes públicas. Gestión 2000. Barcelona.
  • Jorba, L.. (2009). Deliberación y preferencias ciudadanas: Un enfoque empírico. La experiencia de Córdoba. CIS. Madrid.
  • Kunstelj, M., Vintar, M.. (2004). Evaluating the Progress of E-government Development: A critical Analysis. Information Polity. 131-148
  • Lariscy, R.W., Tinkham, S.F., Sweetaer, K.D.. (2011). Kids These Days: Examining Differences in Political Uses and Gratifications, internet...
  • Layne, K., Lee, J.. (2001). Developing Fully Functional E-government: A Four Stage Model. Government Information Quarterly. 18. 122-136
  • Lee, G., Kwak, Y.H.. (2011). An Open Government Implementation Model: Moving to increased Public Engagement. IBM Center for the Business of...
  • Lijphart, A.. (2000). Modelos de democracia. Ariel. Madrid.
  • Luna-Reyes, L.F., Hernández, J.M., Gil-García, J.R.. (2009). Hacia un modelo de los determinantes de éxito de los portales de gobierno en...
  • Majone, G.. (1989). Evidence, argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process. Yale University Press. New Haven.
  • Majone, G.. (2001). Ideas, interests, and institutional change: The European commission Debates the Delegation Problem.
  • Mancinelli, E.. (2007). e-inclusion in the information Society.
  • Mandarano, L., Meenar, M., Steins, C. (2010). Building Social Capital in the Digital Age of Civic Engagement. Journal of Planning Literature....
  • Manin, B.. (1987). On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation. Political Theory. 15. 338-368
  • March, J.G., Olsen, J.P. (1984). The New institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review. 734-749
  • March, J.G.. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. The Free Press. Nueva York.
  • Máiz, R.. (2009). Teorías políticas contemporáneas. Tirant lo Blanch. Valencia.
  • North, D.. (2000). La evolución histórica de las formas de gobierno. Revista de Economía Institucional. 133-148
  • North, D.. (2005). Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton University Press. Princeton.
  • Norris, P.. (2001). Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge....
  • Norris, D.F., Moon, M.J.. (2005). Advancing E-government at the Grass Roots: Tortoise or Hare?. Public administration Review. 65. 64-75
  • (2003). The E-government Imperative: Main Findings. OCDE. París.
  • O'Donnell, G.. (2003). Democratic accountability in Latin America. Oxford University Press. Nueva York. 34-54
  • O'Donnell, G.. (2010). Democracia,, agencia, Estado: Teoría con intención comparativa. Prometeo. Buenos Aires.
  • (2012).
  • (2012).
  • Parkinson, J.. (2003). Legitimacy Problems in Deliberative Democracy. Political Studies. 180-196
  • Pina, V., Torres, L., Royo, S.. (2007). Are icts improving Transparency and Accountability in the EU Regional and Local Governments? An Empirical...
  • Pettit, P.. (1999). Republicanismo. Paidós. Barcelona.
  • Popper, K.. (1963). The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton University Press. Princeton.
  • Przeworski, A.. (1991). Democracy and the Market. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
  • Ramírez-Alujas, A.. (2011). Gobierno abierto y modernización de la gestión Pública. Tendencias actuales y el (inevitable) camino que viene....
  • Ramírez-Alujas, A., Villoria, M.. (2012). Innovaciones de raíz democrática en la administración: ¿Recuperando legitimidad ante la crisis?....
  • Rawls, J.. (2000). Teoría de la justicia. Fondo de Cultura Económica. México.
  • Rawls, J.. (2005). Political Liberalism. Columbia University Press. Nueva York.
  • Riabacke, M., Astróm, J., Grónlund, A.. (2011). E-participation Galore? Extending Multicriteria Decision Analysis to the Public. International...
  • Rodrigues, R.. (2010). The Offensive Internet. Harvard University Press. Cambridge. 237-258
  • Ronaghan, S.A.. (2001). Benchmarking E-government: A Global Perspective. United Nations Division for Public Economics and Public AdministrationAmerican...
  • Rosanvallon, P.. (2010). La legitimidad democrática. Paidós. Barcelona.
  • Sæbø, O., Rose, J., Nyvang, T.. (2009). Electronic Participation. Springer. BerlínHeidelberg.
  • Scharpf, F.. (2005). Conceptos de legitimación más allá del Estado-Nación. Revista Española de Ciencia Política. 13-50
  • Schlosberg, D., Zavestoski, S., Shulman, S.W.. (2007). Democracy and E-rulemaking: Web-based Technologies, Participation and the Potential...
  • Schumpeter, J.A.. (1976). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Harper Perennial. Nueva York.
  • Selznick, Ph.. (1992). The Moral Commowealth: Social Theory and the Promise of Community. University of California Press. Berkeley.
  • Sen, A.. (2010). La idea de la justicia. Taurus. Madrid.
  • Schauer, F.. (2011). Transparency in Three Dimensions. University of Illinois Law Review. 2011. 1339-1357
  • Shim, D.C, Eom, T.H.. (2008). E-government and Anti-corruption: Empirical Analysis of international Data. International Journal of Public...
  • Shim, D.C. (2009). Anticorruption Effects of information and communication Technology (ICT) and Social Capital. International Review of Administrative...
  • Shklar, J.. (1990). Vicios ordinarios. Fondo de Cultura Económica. México.
  • Sosa, J.. (2011). Transparencia y rendición de cuentas. Siglo XXI. México.
  • Spina, A.. (2012). Converging and Conflicting Trends in the Public Administration of the US, Europe, and Germany. Speyer. 19-20
  • Steiner, J., Bachtiger, A., Sporndli, M., Steenbergen, M.R.. (2004). Deliberative Politics in action: analyzing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge...
  • Subirats, J.. (2002). Democracia digital. Límites y oportunidades. Trotta. Madrid.
  • Subirats, J.. (2012). ¿Qué democracia y qué administración para la nueva época?, Internet y la gestión pública. Ekonomiaz. 71-91
  • Sunstein, C., Thaler, R.. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism is Not an Oxymoron. University of Chicago Law Review. 70. 1159-1202
  • Sunstein, C.R.. (2007). Republic.com2.0. Princeton University Press. Princeton.
  • Sunstein, C.R.. (2011). Empirically informed Regulation. University of Chicago Law Review. 1349-1429
  • Thaler, R.H., Sunstein, C.R.. (2008). Nudge. Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness. Yale Univiversity Press. New Haven.
  • Tapscott, D., Williams, A.D.. (2011). Macrowikinomics. Nuevas fórmulas para impulsar la economía mundial. Paidós. Barcelona.
  • (2008). The Economist.
  • Torres, L., Pina, V., Acerete, B.. (2005). E-government Developments on Delivering Public Services among EU cities. Government Information...
  • Vallespín, F.. (2012). La mentira os hará libres. Galaxia Gutemberg. Barcelona.
  • Van Aken, J.E.. (2004). Management Research Based on the Paradigm of the Design Sciences: The Quest for Field-Tested and Grounded Technological...
  • Van der Hoven, J.. (2005). E-democracy, E-contestation and the Monitorial citizen. Ethics and Information Technology. 7. 51-59
  • Van Dijk, J.. (2006). Digital Divide Research. Achievements and Shortcomings. Poetics. 221-235
  • Vanhommering, I., Karré, P.M.. (2012). 8th Transatlantic Dialogue "Transitions in Governance". Radboud University Nijmegen. 7-9
  • Van Parijs, P.. (1981). Evolutionary Explanation in the Social Sciences. Rowman and Littlefield. New Jersey.
  • Von Waldenberg, W.. (2004). Electronic Government and Development. European Journal of Development Research. 417-432
  • Wences, I.. (2010). Cultura de la legalidad: Instituciones, procesos y estructuras. Los Libros de la Catarata. Madrid.
  • (2011). The Future of Government: Lessons Learned from Around the World, Global Agenda council on the Future of Government.
  • Yildiz, M.. (2007). E-government Research. Reviewing the Literature, Limitations, and Ways Forward. Government Information Quarterly. 24....