La inteligencia artificial en la encrucijada ontológica: Un análisis filosófico, ético y legal

• Jesús Cendrós Guasch ^[1] ; Pavel Cendrós Parra ^[2]
  1. [1] Universidad del Zulia, Universidad Privada Dr. Rafael Belloso Chacín, Maracaibo - Venezuela
  2. [2] Universidad Privada Dr. Rafael Belloso Chacín, Universidad del Zulia, Maracaibo - Venezuela
• Localización: Revista de filosofía, ISSN-e 0798-1171, Vol. 43, Nº. 116, 2026, págs. 134-143
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.22618525
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Artificial intelligence at the ontological crossroads: A philosophical, ethical, and legal analysis
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen
  • español

    Este artículo explora los dilemas filosóficos fundamentales que presenta el desarrollo de la Inteligencia Artificial (IA) desde una perspectiva interdisciplinaria. Analiza críticamente la dialéctica entre beneficios potenciales y riesgos existenciales, examinando la posibilidad de sustitución humana y la aplicabilidad de categorías éticas binarias a sistemas autónomos. Cuestiona si la IA puede desarrollar atributos considerados exclusivamente humanos como el alma, la imaginación genuina o el instinto. La discusión se extiende a los sistemas de IA generativa, planteando interrogantes sobre la naturaleza del arte y la autoría. El análisis sostiene que la IA actual carece de intencionalidad creativa autónoma y conciencia estética, funcionando como herramienta de combinatoria estadística. Sin embargo, esta compleja simbiosis humano-IA desafía los marcos legales tradicionales, haciendo necesario desarrollar nuevas categorías jurídicas. El artículo concluye proponiendo un marco de coexistencia ontológica que potencie las capacidades humanas mientras gestiona proactivamente los riesgos asociados a la inteligencia no biológica.

  • English

    This article explores the fundamental philosophical dilemmas presented by the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) from an interdisciplinary perspective. It critically analyzes the dialectic between potential benefits and existential risks, examining the possibility of human substitution and the applicability of binary ethical categories to autonomous systems. It questions whether AI can develop attributes considered exclusively human, such as the soul,genuine imagination, or instinct. The discussion extends to generative AI systems, raising questions about the nature of art and authorship. The analysis argues that current AI lacks autonomous creative intentionality and aesthetic consciousness, functioning instead as a tool of statistical combinatorics. However, this complex human-AI symbiosis challenges traditional legal frameworks, making the development of new legal categories necessary. The article concludes by proposing a framework of ontological coexistence that enhances human capabilities while proactively managing the risks associated with non-biological intelligence.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Citas Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (2.ª ed.). Routledge.
  • Bostrom, N. (2014). Superintelligence: Paths, dangers, strategies. Oxford University Press.
  • Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W....
  • Chalmers, D. J. (1995). Facing up to the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 2(3), 200–219.
  • Chen, L., & Rodríguez, M. (2024). Legal Frameworks for AI-Generated Content: A Comparative Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
  • Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. Oxford University Press.
  • Danto, A. C. (1964). The artworld. The Journal of Philosophy, 61(19), 571–584.
  • Dreyfus, H. L. (1992). What computers still can't do: A critique of artificial reason. MIT Press.
  • European Union. (2023). Artificial Intelligence Act: Comprehensive Framework for Trustworthy AI.
  • Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V,... & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An Ethical Framework...
  • Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S,... & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets.
  • Hugenholtz, P. B., & Quintais, J. P. (2021). Copyright and artificial creation: Does EU copyright law protect AI-assisted output? International...
  • Koch, C. (2019). The feeling of life itself: Why consciousness is widespread but can't be computed. MIT Press.
  • Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. MIT Press.
  • Müller, V. C. (2024). Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence. Routledge.
  • Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
  • Russell, S. (2019). Human compatible: Artificial intelligence and the problem of control. Viking.
  • Searle, J. R. (1980). Minds, brains, and programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(3), 417–424.
  • Smith, J. A., & Johnson, R. (2023). Governance Frameworks for Advanced AI Systems. Science and Public Policy, 50(2), 215-230.
  • Smith, J. A., & Lee, H. (2023). The Algorithmic Mirror: Generative AI and the Future of Human Creativity. Journal of Aesthetics and Art...
  • Topol, E. (2019). Deep Medicine: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Healthcare Human Again. Basic Books.
  • Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea (TJUE). (2011). Case C-145/10, Eva-Maria Painer v Standard VerlagsGmbH and Others.
  • Turilli, M., & Floridi, L. (2009). The ethics of information transparency. Ethics and Information Technology, 11(2), 105–112.
  • UNESCO. (2023). AI and the Sustainable Development Goals: An Ethical Impact Assessment. UNESCO Publishing.
  • U.S. Copyright Office. (2023). Copyright registration guidance: Works containing material generated by artificial intelligence. Federal Register,...
  • Wiener, N. (1954). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society (2.ª ed.). Houghton Mifflin.
  • Wiener, N. (1960). Some moral and technical consequences of automation. Science, 131(3410), 1355–1358.
  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.