Standards and methods of proof: An english perspective on Della Torre’s comparative legal history

• Autores: Paul Roberts
• Localización: Quaestio facti. Revista internacional sobre razonamiento probatorio, ISSN-e 2604-6202, Nº. 9, 2025, págs. 225-239
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.33115/udg_bib/qf.i9.23151
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • This Comment responds to Jacopo Della Torre’s recent article advocating Taking the Evolution of the Standards of Proof for Criminal Conviction Seriously. Having summarised Della Torre’s central thesis and clarified (and largely endorsed) his contextual approach to investigating the criminal standard of proof, I offer—from the perspective of an English common lawyer—some methodological caveats, conceptual reservations and minor textual corrections to Della Torre’s illuminating comparative legal history

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Brodowski, D., Fissell, B. and Roberts, P. (2024). Pretext, Deception and Entrapment in Criminal Investigations. In K. Ambos, A. Duff, A....
  • Brook, C. A., Fiannaca, B., Harvey, D., Marcus, P., Pomerance, R. and Roberts, P. (2021). A Comparative Examination of Police Interrogation...
  • Dahlman, C., Stein, A. and Tuzet, G. (2021). Philosophical Foundations of Evidence Law. Oxford University Press.
  • Damaška, M. (1997). Rational and Irrational Proof Revisited. Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, 5(25), p. 25-40.
  • Damaška, M. (2018). Evaluation of Evidence: Pre-Modern and Modern Approaches. Cambridge University Press.
  • Darbyshire, P., Maughan, A. and Stewart, A. (2001). What Can We Learn from Published Jury Research? Findings for the Criminal Courts Review....
  • Della Torre, J. (2025). Taking the Evolution of the Standards of Proof for Criminal Conviction Seriously. Quaestio facti. International Journal...
  • Ellison, L. and Munro, V. E. (2015). ‘Telling tales’: exploring narratives of life and law within the (mock) jury room. Legal Studies, 35(2),...
  • Epps, D. (2015). The Consequences of Error in Criminal Justice. Harvard Law Review, 128(4), p. 1065-1151.
  • Franklin, J. (2001). The Science of Conjecture: Evidence and Probability before Pascal. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Helm, R. K. (2024). How Juries Work. Oxford University Press.
  • Hobsbawn, E. (1988). The Age of Revolution: 1789–1848. Abacus.
  • Johnson, P. (1991). The Birth of the Modern: World Society 1815-1830. HarperCollins.
  • Keane, A. and McKeown, P. (2019). Time to abandon "beyond reasonable doubt" and "sure": The case for a new direction on the...
  • Kotsoglou, K. N. (2020). Proof beyond a context-relevant doubt. A structural analysis of the standard of proof in criminal adjudication. Artificial...
  • Marcus, P. (2013). Judges Talking To Jurors in Criminal Cases: Why U.S. Judges Do It So Differently From Just About Everyone Else. Arizona...
  • Nelken, D. (1995). Disclosing/Invoking Legal Culture: an Introduction. Social and Legal Studies, 4(4), p. 435-452. https://doi.org/10.1177/096466399500400401
  • Nelken, D. (ed.) (2000). Contrasting Criminal Justice. Ashgate.
  • Picinali, F. (2015). The threshold lies in the method: instructing jurors about reasoning beyond reasonable doubt. International Journal of...
  • Picinali, F. (2022). Justice In-Between: A Study of Intermediate Criminal Verdicts. Oxford University Press.
  • Roberts, P. (2010). Confronting the Challenges of Cosmopolitan Criminal Jurisprudence. Inaugural Lecture, University of Nottingham, 10 September...
  • Roberts, P. (2020). Adrian Zuckerman’s New Evidence Scholarship. In R. Assy and A. Higgins (eds.), Principles, Procedure, and Justice: Essays...
  • Roberts, P. (2022a). Beccaria Now: (Re)reading On Crimes and Punishment. In A. du Bois-Pedain and S. Eldar (eds), Re- Reading Beccaria: On...
  • Roberts, P. (2022b). Roberts and Zuckerman's Criminal Evidence (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.
  • Roberts, P. (2023). Theorising Evidence Law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 43(3), p. 629-649. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqad007
  • Roberts, P. (2024). Review of Picinali: Justice In-Between: A Study of Intermediate Criminal Verdicts. In Criminal Law and Criminal Justice...
  • Roberts, P. (2025). Reasonable Doubts?: Rationalising Appellate Review of Witness Credibility in Criminal Trials. Canadian Criminal Law Review,...
  • Shapiro, B. J. (1991). Beyond Reasonable Doubt and Probable Cause: Historical Perspectives on the Anglo-American Law of Evidence. California...
  • Stephen, J. F. (1881). A Digest of the Law of Evidence (4th edition) Macmillan & Co.
  • Stephen, J. F. (1996) [1883]. A History of the Criminal Law of England (volume 1). Routledge.
  • Thomas, C. (2013). Avoiding the Perfect Storm of Juror Contempt. Criminal Law Review, p. 483-503. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1390245/1/Chery_Thomas_article__final.pdf
  • Tuzet, G. (2020). Assessment Criteria or Standards of Proof? An Effort in Clarification. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 28(1), p. 91-109.
  • Waldman, T. (1959). Origins of the Legal Doctrine of Reasonable Doubt. Journal of the History of Ideas, 20(3), p. 299-316. https://doi.org/10.2307/2708111
  • Weisselberg, C. D. (2017). Exporting and Importing Miranda. Boston University Law Review, 97, p. 1235-1291. https://www.bu.edu/bulawreview/files/2017/08/WEISSELBERG.pdf
  • Whitman, J. Q. (2008). The Origins of Reasonable Doubt: Theological Roots of the Criminal Trial. Yale University Press.
  • AG v Dean and Canons of Windsor (1860) 11 ER 472, 8 HLC 369.
  • Criminal Appeal Act 1968, c. 19. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1968/19/contents
  • Criminal Justice Act 1988, c. 33. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/33/contents
  • Criminal Practice Directions 2023. https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Criminal-Practice-Directions-2023-1.pdf
  • Domestic Abuse Act 2021, c. 17. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2021/17/contents
  • Enohin v Wylie (1862) ER 924; 10 HLC 1.
  • Ferguson v R [1979] 1 WLR 94, PC.
  • Forbes v Meer Mahomed Tuquee (1870) 20 ER 614, 13 Moore Ind App 438.
  • In re Winship, 397 US 358 (1970).
  • Judicial College (2024). The Crown Court Compendium (Part I: Jury and Trial Management and Summing Up). https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Crown-Court-Compendium-Part-IJuly-2024.pdf
  • Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, c. 60. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1984/60/contents
  • R v Adams (No.2) [1998] 1 Cr App R 377, CA.
  • R v Ayre [2025] EWCA Crim 255.
  • R v Gray (1900) 82 Law Times 534 (16 June).
  • R v Kritz [1950] 1 KB 82, CCA.
  • R v Majid [2009] EWCA Crim 2563.
  • R v Smith (Michael William) [2012] EWCA Crim 404.
  • R v Summers (1952) 36 Cr App R 14, CCA.
  • R v Yap Chuan Ching (1976) 63 Cr App R 7, CA.
  • Road Traffic Act 1988, c. 52. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/52/contents
  • Serious Crime Act 2015, c. 9. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/9/contents
  • Thakoor v Rai (1865) 19 ER 941, 10 Moore Ind App 183.
  • Way v East (1853) 61 ER 635, 2 Drewry 44.
  • Woolmington v DPP [1935] AC 462, HL.