In search of innovation in the public sector: Interinstitutional dialogue between control and management

• Autores: Carina Franco Dias Lyra, Emmanuel Paiva de Andrade
• Localización: International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof.Bus. Rev., ISSN 2525-3654, ISSN-e 2525-3654, Vol. 9, Nº. 7, 2024 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Continuous publication; e04860)
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.26668/businessreview/2024.v9i7.4837
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • Objective: To analyze the relationship between control bodies and management bodies and verify possible tension between them, and what are the causes and consequences for innovation in the public sector.

    Theoretical Framework: The theoretical framework provides relevant information about the supervision of the Audit Courts in Brazil and its influence on decision-making, risk aversion and the impact of this aversion on innovations in the Brazilian Public Sector.

    Method: The analysis of this research was based on the methodology of Grounded Theory and on carrying out  interviews with directors of two municipalities located in the State of Rio de Janeiro and supervisory employees of two Audit Courts and two Internal Affairs Offices located in the State of Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro.

    Results and Discussion: The existence of tension between control bodies and management bodies contributes to an environment of insecurity and fear in decision-making in public management. The possible causes of this tension are due to factors originating from both sides and from the public sector inspection relationship itself.

    Research Implications: By specifically examining the causes that lead to this tension, this research fills a crucial gap in the literature, offering insights into the challenges and improvements to having a fertile environment for innovation in the public sector Originality/Value: By understanding the causes that lead to an aversion to risk in relation to innovation, agencies can create mechanisms that create an environment of dialogue and cooperation for innovation in the public sector.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Acevedo, S., & Dassen, N. (2016, September). Innovation for better management: The contribution of public innovation labs. IDB Technical...
  • Alves, H., & Homerin, J. C. (2016). O descompasso entre os modelos de gestão e controle na Prefeitura de São Paulo: um estudo exploratório...
  • Ansell, C., Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2021). The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The...
  • Borins, S. (2001). The Challenge of Innovating in Government. IBM Center for The Business of Government.
  • Braga, A. de C. O. P. (2020). O Tribunal de Contas da União Impõe Obstáculos à Inovação? In C. A. Sundfeld, & A. Rosilho (org.). Tribunal...
  • Braga, M. V. de A. (2021). Vale quanto Pesa: um estudo sobre os impactos do controle na gestão. Belo Horizonte: Fórum.
  • Brown, L., & Osborne, S. P. (2013). Risk and Innovation: Towards a framework for risk governance in public services. Public Management...
  • Campana, P. de S. P. (2017). A cultura do medo na administração pública e a ineficiência gerada pelo atual sistema de controle. Revista de...
  • Cella, R. S., & Machado, M. R. R. (2020). Do dano ao erário à inelegibilidade: uma análise das prestações de contas de gestores municipais...
  • Cinar, E., Trott, P., & Simms, C. (2019). A systematic review of barriers to public sector innovation process. Public Management Review,...
  • Dionisio, P. de H. (2019). O direito ao erro do administrador público no Brasil: contexto, fundamentos e parâmetros (Dissertação de Mestrado)....
  • Gaetani, F. (2020). Você sabe como o avanço dos órgãos de controle impacta nas decisões governamentais? Recuperado de: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXm3C__yVtA
  • Guimarães, F. V. (2016). O direito administrativo do medo: a crise da ineficiência pelo controle. Recuperado de: http://www.direitodoestado.com.br/colunistas/fernando-vernalha-guimaraes/o-direito-administrativo-do-medo-a-crise-da-ineficiencia-pelo-controle.
  • Hartley, J., Sorensen, E., & Torfi, J. (2013). Collaborative Innovation: A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organizational...
  • Medeiros, B. A. de. (2021). A Explosão de auditorias e o Tribunal de Contas da União. Desenvolvimento em Debate, 9(3), 11- 45.
  • Meijer, A., Thaens, M. (2020). The Dark Side of Public Innovation. Public Performance and Management Review, 44(1), 136-154.
  • Miranda, R. F. de A. (2018). Implementando a gestão de riscos no setor público. Fórum.
  • Mulgan, G. (2014). The radical’s dilemma: An overview of the practice and prospects of Social and Public Labs. Social and public labs.
  • Ogata, A. K. K., Contreras Pinochet, L. H, Gama, M. F. L., & Leister, A. C. da C. (2021). Asymmetries in the informational content of...
  • Oliveira, R. C. R., & Halpern, E. (2020). O mito do quanto mais controle melhor na Administração Pública. Zênite Fácil, categoria Doutrina,...
  • Osborne, S., Brandsen, T., Mele, V., Nemec, J., van Genugten, M., & Flemig, S. (2019). Risking innovation. Understanding risk and public...
  • Quintão, C., & Carneiro, R. (2015). A tomada de contas especial como instrumento de controle e responsabilização. Revista de Administração...
  • Ribeiro, F. de O., Sallaberry, J. D., Santos, E. A. dos, & Tavares, G. de O. D. (2020). Ações dos Tribunais de Contas no enfrentamento...
  • Ritchie, F. (2014). Resistance to change in government: risk, inertia and incentives. Economics Working Paper Series, p. 22.
  • Rosilho, A. (2019). Controle e inovação: juntos e shallow now? GNPapo. Recuperado de: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JDX2I1pd5fA
  • Santos, R. C. C. (2021). O controle público no século XXI: um estudo a partir do diálogo institucional entre BNDES e TCU. Brasília-DF. Recuperado...
  • com.br/consulta/artigos/57375/o-controle-pblico-no-sculo-xxi-um-estudo-a-partir-do-dilogo-institucional-entre-bndes-e-tcu.
  • Santos, R.V. (2020). Direito administrativo do medo :Risco e fuga da responsabilização dos agentes públicos (1. ed.). São Paulo.
  • Sophie, F., Stephen, O., & Kinder, T. (2016). Risky business—reconceptualizing risk and innovation in public services. Public Money and...
  • Spink, P. (1997). Continuidade e descontinuidade administrativa: uma análise de fatores que contribuem para a manutenção de programas, projetos...
  • Stewart-Weeks, M., & Kastelle, T. (2015). Innovation in the Public Sector. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 74(1), 63–72.
  • Sundfeld, C. A. (2014). Chega de axé no direito administrativo. Recuperado de https://www.sbdp.org.br/wp/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/artigos-carlos-ari-sundfeld-chega-de-axe-no-direito-administrativo.pdf
  • Torfing, J., Sorensen, E., & Roiseland, A. (2019). Transforming the public sector into an arena for Co-Creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits,...
  • Torugsa, N., & Arundel, A. (2017). Rethinking the effect of risk aversion on the benefits of service innovations in public administration...
  • World Economic Forum (2021). The Global Risks Report 2021: 16th Edition. Weforum. Org. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2021.pdf