Epistemology of e-democracy and e-governance through scientific mapping

• García-Río, Esther ^[1] ; Baena-Luna, Pedro ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad de Sevilla

     Universidad de Sevilla

     Sevilla, España

     
• Localización: Tourism & Management Studies, ISSN-e 2182-8466, ISSN 2182-8458, Nº. 20, 2024, 14 págs.
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.18089/tms.2024SI01
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • This paper aims to address the current limitations in knowledge about e-democracy by establishing the conceptual, intellectual, and social structure of scientific literature. Hence, this paper offers an in-depth bibliometric analysis of the literature that has addressed this reality since its first publication in 1983. The most important scientific databases currently used in the academic field were consulted to achieve this objective: Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus. In the case of WoS, 540 articles were identified, 572 in the case of Scopus. The results were harmonised to obtain a final 773 articles under study. This harmonisation of results from different databases is a differential element concerning other studies in which the analysis was carried out on a single database, thus reducing a global and homogeneous vision of the possible connections and interrelationships of the realities analysed. The information collected has been processed using the Bibliometrix tool, which provides information on annual scientific production, authors, journals, topics, keywords, etc. The processing and analysis of the results has made it possible to identify research trends in the area, establish relationships between them and detect future research opportunities for the e-democracy phenomenon.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Al Khawatreh, A., El-Manaseer, S., Al-Kayid, J., & ElTayeb, E. (2023). The impact of digital transformation on the exercise of the right...
  • Ambrosino, A., Birk, S. C., Mingardi, C., Nikolou, G., Spielberger, L., Thevenin, E., & Trinkle, A. (2023). Youth and democracy: Digital...
  • Antón-Maraña, P., Puche-Regaliza, J. C., Arranz-Val, P., & Aparicio-Castillo, S. (2023). Examining the relationship between online distribution...
  • Baena-Luna, P., & García-Río, E. (2021). El intraemprendimiento desde una perspectiva de género. Una revisión sistemática de la literatura...
  • Benjamin, B. (1984). Strong democracy: participatory politics for a new age. Los Angeles: University of California.
  • Bindu, N., Sankar, C. P., & Kumar, K. S. (2019). From conventional governance to e-democracy: Tracing the evolution of e-governance research...
  • Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T., & O’Leary, R. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation...
  • Caputo, A., & Kargina, M. (2022). A user-friendly method to merge Scopus and Web of Science data during bibliometric analysis. Journal...
  • Chadwick, A. (2003). Bringing e-democracy back in: Why it matters for future research on e-governance. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4),...
  • Chairunnisa, G., Syahputri, A., & Malang, U. M. (2023). Research trend on e-democracy publications: A bibliometric analysis. Politik Indonesia:...
  • Colina-Vargas, A., & Espinoza-Mina, M. (2022). Retrospective of scientific production on e-democracy. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 3282,...
  • Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines....
  • Estevão, C., Garcia, A. R., Filipe, S. B., & Fernandes, C. (2017). Convergence in tourism management research: a bibliometric analysis....
  • Garcia-Rio, E., Palos-Sanchez, P. R., Baena-Luna, P., & Aguayo-Camacho, M. (2023). Different approaches to analyzing e-government adoption...
  • Ghazinoory, S., Mardani, A., Maddah-Ali, M. A., & Montazer, G. A. (2024). A blockchain-powered e-cognocracy model for democratic decision...
  • Gökalp, E., Demirörs, O., & Eren, P. E. (2020). Public personnel management process capability assessment. Public Personnel Management,...
  • Guleria, D., & Kaur, G. (2021). Bibliometric analysis of ecopreneurship using VOSviewer and RStudio Bibliometrix, 1989–2019. Library Hi...
  • Gupta, D. K., & Biswas, A. K. (2021). The institutionalization of e-democracy: Challenges, risks, and future directions in an Indian context....
  • Hossain, A. N. M. Z. (2023). E-democracy in Bangladesh - A framework for crisis management. In CEEeGov '23: Proceedings of the Central...
  • Hujran, O., Abu-Shanab, E., & Aljaafreh, A. (2020). Predictors for the adoption of e-democracy: an empirical evaluation based on a citizen-centric...
  • Iden, J., & Eikebrokk, T. R. (2013). Implementing IT service management: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information...
  • Kampen, J. K., & Snijkers, K. (2003). E-democracy: A critical evaluation of the ultimate e-dream. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4),...
  • Kneuer, M. (2016). E-democracy: A new challenge for measuring democracy. International Political Science Review, 37(5), 666–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512116657677
  • Lidén, G. (2015). Technology and democracy: Validity in measurements of e-democracy. Democratization, 22(4), 698–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2013.873407
  • Mahrer, H. (2005). Politicians as patrons for e-democracy? Closing the gap between ideals and realities. International Journal of Electronic...
  • Molnár, A., & Urbanovics, A. (2020). The role of e-democracy in Italy and Hungary. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy,...
  • Muhammad, A. (2023). E-governance and e-democracy: A digital revolution. SSRN Electronic Journal, 1–134. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4623414
  • Mukherjee, D., Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Donthu, N. (2022). Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research....
  • Naccari-Carlizzi, D., Rindone, C., Quattrone, A., & D’Errigo, F. (2023). Decision making and e-democracy: Archimede, a tool to support...
  • Norris, D. F., & Reddick, C. G. (2013). E-democracy at the American grassroots: Not now … not likely? Information Polity, 18, 201–216....
  • Palomares, I., Martínez, L., & Herrera, F. (2014). A consensus model to detect and manage noncooperative behaviors in large-scale group...
  • Palos-Sánchez, P. R., Baena-Luna, P., Badicu, A., & Infante-Moro, J. C. (2022). Artificial intelligence and human resources management:...
  • Parris, D. L., & Peachey, J. W. (2013). A systematic literature review of servant leadership theory in organizational contexts. Journal...
  • Peláez-Verdet, A., & Ferrera-Blasco, M. (2017). The usefulness of social media analysis within scholarly publications: A study of first-tier...
  • Prastya, D. E., Misran, & Nurmandi, A. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of e-democracy on government research. Jurnal Ilmiah Mimbar Demokrasi,...
  • Rodríguez-Soler, R., Uribe-Toril, J., & De Pablo Valenciano, J. (2020). Worldwide trends in the scientific production on rural depopulation,...
  • Roztocki, N., Weistroffer, H. R., Roztocki, N., & Weistroffer, H. R. (2023). Beyond e-government : A framework for e-democracy. SAIS 2023...
  • Sendag, S., Toker, S., Uredi, L., & Islim, O. F. (2022). Predictors of e-democracy applicability in Turkish K-12 schools. Education and...
  • Shareef, M. A., Kumar, V., Kumar, U., & Dwivedi, Y. (2014). Factors affecting citizen adoption of transactional electronic government....
  • Sirma, J., & Kihara, T. (2023). Emerging trends in ICT, e-democracy and e-governance. African Multidisciplinary Journal of Research, I,...
  • Staykova, E. (2023). The digital transformation of local democracy during the pandemic. In G. Rouet & T. Côme (Eds.), Participatory and...
  • Storozhenko, L., Ignatenko, O., Yaroshovets, T., Antypenko, I., & Vlasenko, V. (2023). E-democracy in the context of the information society:...
  • Sundberg, L. (2019). Electronic government: Towards e-democracy or democracy at risk? Safety Science, 118, 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2019.04.030
  • Voican, M. (2023). Exploring legal mechanisms to foster e-democracy: Norway Vs . Romanian arrangements. Lex Humana, 15(4), 390–413.
  • Wallin, J. A. (2005). Bibliometric methods: Pitfalls and possibilities. Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, 97(5), 261–275....
  • Zhu, T., & Xu, W. (2024). HCI in e-government and e-democracy. In S. & G. Salvendy (Ed.), Human Computer Interaction (pp. 1–47). Boca...
  • Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629.