El comportamiento fiscal según el modelo de la pendiente resbaladiza en muestras de Argentina y España

• Autores: Lucas Tanos Robein, Bianca Analía Saavedra, Débora Mola, Cecilia Reyna
• Localización: Revista Internacional de Investigación en Ciencias Sociales, ISSN-e 2226-4000, ISSN 2225-5117, Vol. 16, Nº. 2, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Vol 16 Nº 2 Diciembre 2020)
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • Los mecanismos habituales para reducir la evasión fiscal suelen sustentarse en enfoques racionales. Evidencia empírica contrapuesta a estos enfoques llevó al desarrollo de un marco conceptual integrador: el Slippery Slope Framework (SSF), según el cual el cumplimiento fiscal depende de la confianza hacia las autoridades y el poder percibido. En ese marco, condujimos dos estudios experimentales. En ambos estudios utilizamos un diseño factorial inter-sujetos 2 (confianza: alta vs. baja) x 2 (poder: alto vs. bajo). En el primero evaluamos el efecto de la manipulación sobre el comportamiento fiscal de estudiantes de contextos socio-económicos distintos, Argentina y España, sin observar efectos significativos. En el segundo condujimos una réplica de Kogler et al. (2013) con estudiantes de Argentina, evaluando la intención de pago de impuestos. En general, los resultados aportaron evidencia a favor del SSF. Se discuten los resultados de cada estudio y se destaca la relevancia de contar con abordajes experimentales que utilicen el comportamiento fiscal como variable dependiente, así como de continuar evaluando las hipótesis del SSF en distintos contextos.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Allingham, M., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3-4), 323-338. doi: 10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2
  • Alm, J., Bloomquist, K. M., & McKee, M. (2015). On the external validity of laboratory tax compliance experiments. Economic Inquiry, 53(2),...
  • American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologist and code of conduct. Washington, DC: APA.
  • Ayuba, A., Saad, N., & Ariffin, Z. Z. (2018). Testing the assumptions of slippery slope framework on tax compliance: Evidence from Nigerian...
  • Andrighetto, G., Zhang, N., Ottone, S., Ponzano, F., D'Attoma, J., & Steinmo, S. (2016). Evidence from a Tax Compliance Experiment...
  • Benk, S., & Budak, T. (2012). Power and trust as determinants of voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: Empirical evidence for the...
  • Bologna, E. (2013). Estadística para psicología y educación. Córdoba: Editorial Brujas.
  • Da Silva, F. P., Guerreiro, R., & Flores, E. (2019). Voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: The slippery slope framework in the Brazilian...
  • Feld, L. P., & Frey, B. S. (2002). Trust breeds trust: How taxpayers are treated. Economics of Governance, 3(2), 87-99. doi: 10.1007/s101010100032
  • Feld, L. P., & Frey, B. S. (2007). Tax compliance as the result of a psychological tax contract: The role of incentives and responsive....
  • Fjeldstad, O. & Semboja, J. (2001). Why people pay taxes: The case of the development levy in Tanzania. World Development, 29(12), 2059-2074....
  • Frey, B. S., & Torgler, B. (2007). Tax morale and conditional cooperation. Journal of Comparative Economics, 35(1), 136–159. doi: 10.1016/j.jce.2006.10.006
  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Nueva York: The Free Press.
  • Gangl, K., Hofmann, E., Hartl, B., & Berkics, M. (2019). The impact of powerful authorities and trustful taxpayers: evidence for the extended...
  • Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A fine is a price. Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1086/468061
  • Hammar, H., Jagers, S. C., & Nordblom, K. (2009). Perceived tax evasion and the importance of trust. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(2),...
  • Hofmann, E., Voracek, M., Bock, C., & Kirchlerb, E. (2017). Tax compliance across sociodemographic categories: Meta-analyses of survey...
  • Hyun, J. K. (2005). Tax Compliances in Korea and Japan: Why are they different? Available at https://www.mof.go.jp/pri/international_exchange/visiting_scholar_program/kou16-c02.pdf...
  • Jiménez, E. F., & Moreno, J. B. (2001). Pesimismo defensivo, optimismo y dificultad de la tarea: El papel de las expectativas. Revista...
  • Kasper, M. (2012). Voluntary and enforced tax compliance (PhD Theses). Universidad de Viena, Austria.
  • Kasper, M., Kogler, C., & Kirchler, E. (2015). Tax policy and the news: An empirical analysis of taxpayers’ perceptions of tax-related...
  • Kastlunger, B., Lozza, E., Kirchler, E., & Schabmann, A. (2013). Powerful authorities and trusting citizens: The slippery slope framework...
  • Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance. The slippery slope framework. Journal of Economic...
  • Kirchler, E., & Wahl, I. (2010). Tax compliance inventory TAX-I: Designing an inventory for surveys of tax compliance. Journal of Economic...
  • Kogler, C., Batrancea, L., Nichita, A., Jozsef, P., Belianin, A., & Kirchler, E. (2013). Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance:...
  • Lemoine, J. & Roland-Lévy, C. (2012). From the slippery slope framework to responsive regulation. In P. Cunningham & N. Fretwell (eds.),...
  • Lewis, A., Carrera, S., Cullis, J., & Jones, P. (2009). Individual, cognitive and cultural differences in tax compliance: UK and Italy...
  • Lisi, G. (2012). Testing the slippery slope framework. Economics Bulletin, 32(2), 1369-1377. http://www.accessecon.com/Pubs/EB/2012/Volume32/EB-12-V32-I2-P131.pdf
  • Masud, A., Abdul Manaf, N. A., & Saad, N. (2015). Testing assumptions of the slippery slope framework using cross-country data: Evidence...
  • Montoro, A., Shih, P. C., Román, M., & Molina, A. M. (2014). Spanish adaptation of Yamagishi General Trust Scale. Anales de Psicología,...
  • Muehlbacher, S., Kirchler, E., & Schwarzenberger, H. (2011). Voluntary versus enforced tax compliance: Empirical evidence for the slippery...
  • Niemirowski, P., Wearing, A. J., Baldwin, S., Leonard, B., & Mobbs, C. (2002). The influence of tax related behaviors, beliefs, attitudes...
  • Putnam, R. (1993). The prosperous community: social capital and public life. The american prospect, 13(4), 35-42. http://www. prospect. org/print/vol/13
  • Scholtz, J. T., & Lubell, M. (1998). Adaptive political attitudes: Duty, trust, and fear as monitors of tax policy. American Journal of...
  • Schweitzer, M. E., Ordóñez, L., & Douma, B. (2004). Goal setting as a motivator of unethical behavior. Academy of Management Journal,...
  • Sheeran, P. (2001) Intention-behavior: A conceptual and empirical review. European review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 1-36. doi: 10.1080/14792772143000003
  • Slemrod, J., & Yitzhaki, S. (2002). Tax avoidance, evasion, and administration. In: A. J. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (eds.), Handbook...
  • Srinivasan, T. N. (1973). Tax Evasion: A Model. Journal of Public Economics, 2(4), 339-346. doi: 10.1016/0047-2727(73)90024-8
  • Tanos Robein, L., Saavedra, B., Mola, D., & Reyna, C. (2020). Diferencias transculturales en la declaración de impuestos antediferentes...
  • Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (1999). Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4),...
  • Torgler, B. (2003). Tax morale, rule-governed behaviour and trust. Constitutional Political Economy, 14(2), 119-140. doi: 10.1023/A:1023643622283
  • Wahl, I., Kastlunger, B., & Kirchler, E. (2010). Trust in authorities and power to enforce tax compliance: An empirical analysis of the...
  • Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18(2), 129-166. doi:...
  • Zhang, N., Andrighetto, G., Ottone, S., Ponzano, F., & Steinmo, S. (2016). Willing to Pay? Tax compliance in Britain and Italy: An experimental...