Acceso usuarios
Juan Manuel Blanch Nougués 
La relación del pensamiento de Stracca con el del comentarista medieval Baldo degli Ubaldi constituye una de las claves fundamentales para entender el Tratado De conturbatoribus sive decoctoribus de Stracca. Sin pretender incurrir en imágenes maniqueístas de contraposición de la rigidez y dureza bajomedieval de trato a los comerciantes con respecto a la mayor humanidad de la Edad Moderna, se propone un análisis crítico del diálogo que Stracca lleva a cabo en su obra de principio a fin para defender su tesis frente a Baldo de garantizar un trato diferente y más ecuánime a los quebrados que hayan sufrido ruina fortuita. Se analiza el concepto de quebrado y de insolvencia que maneja Stracca y que le permite superar el juego de presunciones medievales contra los comerciantes. Al final se propone un cuadro de hasta 85 asuntos en los que Stracca se refiere a Baldo en su obra. Se confronta el pensamiento de Stracca con la ley concursal española actual a propósito de la calificación del concurso como fortuito o culpable. Se hace hincapié en la importancia de las fuentes jurídicas romanas utilizadas por ambos autores.
The relationship between Stracca's thought and Baldo’s, the well-known medieval legal commentator, constitutes one of the fundamental keys to understand the Treatise De conturbatoribus sive decoctoribus of Stracca. Without intending to use manichean images of contrasting the rigidity and hardness of the late medieval treatment of merchants with respect to the greater humanity of the Modern Age, a critical analysis of the dialogue that Stracca establishes with Baldo in his work, from the beginning to the end, is proposed to understand his thesis against Baldo in order to guarantee a different and more equitable treatment to the bankrupts who have suffered fortuitous ruin. This paper analizes the concept of bankruptcy and insolvency that Stracca builds, which allows him to overcome the use of medieval presumptions against merchants. At the end, a table of up to 85 issues is presented in which Stracca quotes Baldo's opinion to praise or criticize it. Stracca's thought is confronted with the current Spanish bankruptcy law, regarding the classification of the bankruptcy as fortuitous or culpable. Emphasis is placed on the importance of the Roman legal sources used by both authors.
