Acceso usuarios
Silvina Ribotta 
En el presente artículo abordo la relevancia de las necesidades básicas para la Filosofía del Derecho, desde y a propósito de un trabajo del Profesor Javier de Lucas que, aunque ubicado en la primera etapa de su vida investigadora, se puede rastrear como preocupación y compromiso en gran parte de su producción y escritos posteriores sobre personas migrantes y sobre solidaridad. Siendo la teoría de las necesidades un tema que ha sido tratado de manera poco atractiva y sistemática en el Derecho, con confusiones y vaguedades, las conclusiones a las que arriba De Lucas junto con Añón Roig, se suman al esfuerzo de otros autores y autores que han sido pioneros en otorgar legitimidad en la académica española a la discusión sobre necesidades desde las reflexiones sobre el Derecho, contribuyendo a que se instale entre los temas imprescindibles para la Filosofía Jurídico-Política.
This article addresses the relevance of basic needs for the Philosophy of Law from and about a work by Professor Javier de Lucas. Although located in the first stage of his research life, this topic can be traced as a concern and a commitment in much of his production and subsequent writings on migrants and solidarity. Traditionally, the theory of needs had been treated in an unattractive and nonsystematic way in Law, with confusion and vagueness. On the contrary, the conclusions of De Lucas and Añón Roig are pioneers in granting legitimacy in Spanish academia to the discussion on needs and Law, contributing to its installation among the essential topics for Legal-Political Philosophy.
This article addresses the relevance of basic needs for the Philosophy of Law from and about a work by Professor Javier de Lucas. Although located in the first stage of his research life, this topic can be traced as a concern and a commitment in much of his production and subsequent writings on migrants and solidarity. Traditionally, the theory of needs had been treated in an unattractive and nonsystematic way in Law, with confusion and vagueness. On the contrary, the conclusions of De Lucas and Añón Roig are pioneers in granting legitimacy in Spanish academia to the discussion on needs and Law, contributing to its installation among the essential topics for Legal-Political Philosophy.
