Unlocking the Potential of Blockchain Through Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Platform Selection

• Autores: Rajesh Soundararajan, V. M. Shenbagaraman
• Localización: International Journal of Professional Business Review: Int. J. Prof.Bus. Rev., ISSN 2525-3654, ISSN-e 2525-3654, Vol. 8, Nº. 4, 2023 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Continuous publication; e01852)
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i4.1732
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to introduce a methodology that can help organizations choose the best Blockchain platform for their specific business case. With numerous options available, it's important to carefully consider the capabilities of a Blockchain before selecting it. This methodology is intended to provide a structured approach to aid in the decision-making process, taking into account the various characteristics of Blockchain that are needed.

      Theoretical Framework: The theoretical framework for this paper is based on Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and ISO/IEC 25010. MCDM is a decision-making technique that considers multiple criteria when making a choice, which is useful for selecting the best Blockchain platform. ISO/IEC 25010 is a standard that provides a framework for evaluating software quality characteristics, which is relevant for evaluating the quality of the Blockchain platform.

      Design/Methodology/Approach: The methodology presented in this paper involves a structured approach to selecting the best Blockchain platform for a specific business case. The approach is based on a combination of MCDM and ISO/IEC 25010, and involves several steps. First, the relevant criteria for selecting the Blockchain platform are identified. Next, a weighting system is developed to determine the importance of each criterion. Then, each Blockchain platform is evaluated based on the criteria and weights, and a score is assigned. Finally, the scores are aggregated to determine the best Blockchain platform for the specific business case.

      Findings: The main finding of this paper is the methodology for selecting the best Blockchain platform for a specific business case. This methodology can aid organizations in making an informed decision when choosing a Blockchain platform, taking into account the various characteristics of Blockchain that are needed. The paper also highlights the importance of careful consideration when selecting a Blockchain platform, as the wrong choice could have negative consequences.

      Research, Practical & Social Implications: The research implications of this paper are significant, as it provides a structured approach for selecting the best Blockchain platform for a specific business case. This methodology can be used across industries and could have a significant impact on the adoption of Blockchain technology. From a practical perspective, this methodology can aid organizations in making informed decisions when selecting a Blockchain platform, which can save time and resources. From a social perspective, the adoption of Blockchain technology has the potential to revolutionize business operations and improve transparency and accountability.

      Originality/Value: The originality of this paper lies in the development of a methodology for selecting the best Blockchain platform for a specific business case. This methodology is based on a combination of MCDM and ISO/IEC 25010 and is not specific to any one industry. The value of this paper is in providing a structured approach to aid organizations in making an informed decision when selecting a Blockchain platform, taking into account the various characteristics of Blockchain that are needed.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Bai, C., & Sarkis, J. (2010). Green supplier development: analytical evaluation using rough set theory. Journal of Cleaner Production,...
  • Büyüközkan, G., & Çiftçi, G. (2012). Evaluation of the green supply chain management practices: a fuzzy ANP approach. Production Planning...
  • Chamodrakas, I., Batis, D., & Martakos, D. (2010). Supplier selection in electronic marketplaces using satisficing and fuzzy AHP. Expert...
  • Chen, S. J., & Hwang, C. L. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods. Springer Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4
  • Dalkey, N. (1969). An experimental study of group opinion: The Delphi method. Futures, 1(5), 408–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-3287(69)80025-X
  • Farshidi, S., Jansen, S., España, S., & Verkleij, J. (2020). Decision Support for Blockchain Platform Selection: Three Industry Case Studies....
  • Hevner, A. (2007). A Three Cycle View of Design Science Research. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 87-92.
  • Hwang, C. L., & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
  • Jasti, K., & Varalakshmi, C. (2023). Measurement of users Acceptance of Selected Financial Technology Products and Services. International...
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ulukan, Z. (2003). Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logistics Information Management, 16(6),...
  • Kahraman, C., Cebeci, U., & Ruan, D. (2004). Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey....
  • Kilincci, O., & Onal, S. A. (2011). Fuzzy AHP approach for supplier selection in a washing machine company. Expert Systems with Applications,...
  • Kuo, R. J., Chi, S. C., & Kao, S. S. (2002). A decision support system for selecting convenience store locations through integration of...
  • Lee, W. B., Lau, H., Liu, Z. Z., & Tam, S. (2001). A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach in modular product design. Expert Systems,...
  • Lee, A. H. I. (2009). A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits, opportunities, costs and risks. Expert Systems...
  • Mascena, K. M. C., Santos, F. V., & Stocker, F. (2021). Prioritizing Stakeholders in Project Management: Application of the Multicritery...
  • Murtaza, M. B. (2003). Fuzzy-AHP application to country risk assessment. American Business Review, 21(2), 109-116.
  • Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. Retrieved from https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.
  • Pahl, C., Ioini, N. E., & Helmer, S. (2018). A Decision Framework for Blockchain Platforms for IoT and Edge Computing. 3rd International...
  • Saaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill.
  • Shaw, K., Shankar, R., Yadav, S. S., & Thakur, L. S. (2012). Supplier selection using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy multi-objective linear programming...
  • Sun, C. C. (2010). A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12),...
  • Tam, P. T., & Thuy, L. T. (2023). Technology Affecting the Service Quality of Commercial Banks in Vietnam. International Journal of Professional...
  • Weck, M., Klocke, F., Schell, H., & Ruenauver, E. (1997). Evaluating alternative production cycles using the extended fuzzy AHP method....
  • Wohlin, C. (2014). Guidelines for snowballing in Systematic Literature Studies and a Replication in Software Engineering. In EASE '14:...
  • Wust, K., & Gervais, A. (2022). Do you need a Blockchain? Retrieved from https://eprint.iacr.org/2017/375.pdf.
  • Xia, W., & Wu, Z. (2007). Supplier selection with multiple criteria in volume discount environments. Omega, 35(5), 494-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.09.002.
  • Zimmermann, H. J. (2001). Fuzzy set theory and its applications (4th ed.). Springer.