Resumen de Elección del Consejo General del Poder Judicial: un análisis panorámico

David Ortega Gutiérrez

• español

  Se realiza una investigación sobre la elección de los vocales del Consejo General del Poder Judicial a dos niveles: 1. Internacional, comparándola con la postura de diferentes instituciones europeas como el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos, el Consejo de Europa, el Consejo Consultivo de jueces europeos, la Red europea de consejos del Poder Judicial, la Comisión de Venecia incluso el propio Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea; 2. A nivel interno o nacional, analizando el posicionamiento del Tribunal Constitucional, los diferentes grupos parlamentarios, los profesionales de la justicia y la doctrina académica.

• English

  An investigation is carried out on the election of the members of the General Council of the Judiciary at two levels: 1. International, comparing it with the position of different European institutions such as the European Court of Human Rights, the Council of Europe, the Consultative Council of European Judges, the European Network of Councils for the Judiciary, the Venice Commission even the Court of Justice of the European Union itself; 2. At an internal or national level, analyzing the position of the Constitutional Court, the different parliamentary groups, legal professionals and academic doctrine.

  SummaryI. INTRODUCTION. II. INTERNATIONAL SCOPE: 1. Brief comparative note of countries in our environment. 2. Assessment of the ECtHR. 3. Council of Europe: 3.1. Recommendation CM/Rec (2010) 12. 3.2. GRECO: a) Report year 2017. b) Report year 2019. c) Report year 2021. 4. Magna Carta of European Judges. 5. European Network of Councils of the Judiciary. 6. Venice Commission. 7. Court of Justice of the European Union. III. NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE: 1. Constitutional Court. 2. Parliamentary Groups: 2.1. Socialist. 2.2. Popular. 2.3. Ciudadanos. 2.4. Other Parliamentary Groups. 2.5. By way of conclusion. 3. Justice Professionals: 3.1. Associations of judges: a) APM. b) JJpD.c) AJFV. d) IGF. 3.2. General Council of the Legal Profession. 4. Positioning of the doctrine. IV. CONCLUSIONS AND PROPOSAL.