Acceso usuarios
César Augusto Molina Saldarriaga, Olga Cecilia Restrepo Yepes, Milton Andrés Rojas Betancur, Mauricio Zapata Ospina, Luisa Fernanda Bedoya Taborda
Los debates dogmáticos y desarrollos jurídicos sobre el derecho a la alimentación no han contribuido de forma significativa a incrementar sus niveles de satisfacción cualitativa y cuantitativa. Mediante una investigación cualitativa, instrumental, inductiva y de técnica documental se propone un marco teórico y metodológico para la garantía y protección de los derechos, se defiende la justiciabilidad del derecho a la alimentación y, con base en ello, se deconstruyen las principales objeciones a su exigibilidad. Se concluye afirmando que las razones para defender la justiciabilidad del derecho a la alimentación son aplicables a los demás derechos sociales.
Dogmatic debates on the content, structure, components and justiciability of social rights have not contributed to increasing their levels of satisfaction. Likewise, the development of the recognition, guarantee and protection of social rights have not contributed to raising their qualitative and quantitative conditions. From a critical point of view and through a qualitative, instrumental and documentary technique research, a deconstruction of the main objections to the enforceable nature of social rights is carried out: generational and structural. From an explanatory and unified perspective, the right to food is used as a case study to define the existing international and domestic defense means for its protection. Finally, a theoretical and methodological frame of reference is proposed for the complex analysis of social rights. This will make it possible to identify the flaws and propose solutions beyond the merely dogmatic debate on the recognition, guarantee and protection of social rights.
