Este trabajo versa sobre la STJUE 24 marzo 2021, asunto C-603/20 PPU, SS v MCP, relativa a la interpretación del art. 10 del Reglamento 2201/2003. El TJUE considera que el art. 10 no resulta de aplicación para determinar la competencia judicial internacional sobre el fondo del asunto, si un menor ha adquirido la residencia habitual en un tercer Estado, tras un traslado o retención ilícitos.
This article deals with the Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 24 March 2021, Case C-603/20 PPU, SS v MCP, related to the interpretation of Article 10 of Council Regulation (EC) 2201/2003. The Court considers that Article 10 is not applicable to determine jurisdiction if a child has acquired his or her habitual residence in a third State following a wrongful removal or retention in that State.