The Concept and Instances of General Principles of Administrative Law: Towards a Global Administrative Law

• Autores: Arian Petoft
• Localización: Cuestiones constitucionales: revista mexicana de derecho constitucional, ISSN 1405-9193, ISSN-e 2448-4881, Nº. 42, 2020, págs. 309-355
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.22201/iij.24484881e.2020.42.14345
• Títulos paralelos:
  • El concepto y las instancias de los principios generales del derecho administrativo: hacia un derecho administrativo global
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen
  • español

    Resumen Actualmente, presenciamos el aumento del principio general de los discursos del derecho administrativo en todos los sistemas legales para potenciar los valores de buena administración en los órdenes legales administrativos. En numerosos litigios administrativos, los jueces han invocado algunos casos de principios legales que se imponen al contexto de las acciones del gobierno como criterios modernos y requisitos legales; pero, a pesar del papel normativo determinista del principio general del derecho administrativo, su concepto aún no está definido con precisión. Existen múltiples trabajos meticulosos que identifican el concepto de “principio legal” y sus ejemplos conocidos en los sistemas legales; sin embargo, esencialmente no queda claro si, existencialmente, tenemos principios generales de derecho administrativo en nuestros sistemas legales administrativos. Por lo tanto, este documento se esfuerza por proporcionar una respuesta convincente a la pregunta al presentar un discurso estricto sobre la definición del principio general del derecho administrativo y sus posibles instancias en los sistemas legales administrativos, principalmente entre las decisiones de los jueces de la Unión Europea y el Reino Unido -de los cuales representan normas administrativas fundamentales-, al descubrir un concepto general preciso de cada uno de ellos en los sistemas legales, se puede hacer un retrato genérico de la cara del derecho administrativo global.

  • English

    Abstract Nowadays, we are witnessing rise of general principle of administrative law discourses in all legal systems to empower good administration values in administrative legal orders. In numerous administrative litigations, judges have invoked some instances of legal principles which are imposed to the context of government’s actions as modern criterions and legal requirements; but, despite of deterministic normative role of general principle of administrative law, its concept is not yet precisely defined. There are multiple meticulous works that identify concept of legal principle and its known examples in legal systems; nevertheless, this essentially remains unclear that if we existentially have general principles of administrative law in our administrative legal systems. Hence, this paper strives to provide a convincible answer to the question by presenting a stringent discourse about definition of general principle of administrative law and its probable instances in administrative legal systems, mostly, among European Union and United Kingdom (UK) judges’ decisions; whereof general principles of administrative law represent fundamental administrative norms, by finding out an accurate general concept of each of them in legal systems, a generic portrait of global administrative law face can be drawn.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • (1987). 222/86 Unectef v. Heylens.
  • (1976). 111/75 Mazzalai.
  • (1980). 119 & 126/79 Lippische Hauptgenossenschaft.
  • (1970). 22/70 Commission v. Council.
  • (1986). 222/84 Johnston.
  • (1969). 29/69 Stauder v. City of Ulm.
  • (1989). 46/87 & 227/88 Hoechst v. Commission.
  • (1984). 75 & 117/82 Razzouk and Beydoun.
  • (1956). 8/55 Fedechar.
  • (1987). 80/86 Kolpinghuis.
  • Adams, David M.. (2005). Philosophical Problems in the Law. Thomson and Wadsworth. California.
  • Alexy, Robert. (2005). Verantwortetes Recht: die Rechtsphilosophie Arthur Kaufmannns. Franz Steiner Verlag. Stuttgart.
  • Alexy, Robert. (2000). On the Structure of Legal Principles. Ratio Juris. 13.
  • Alexy, Robert. (2001). Verfassungsrecht und einfaches Recht. Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer. 61.
  • Alexy, Robert,Rivers, Julian. (2002). A Theory of Constitutional Rights. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • Andreescu, M.. (2001). Principle of Proportionality, Criterion of Legitimacy in the Public Law. Lex et Scientia Juridical Series. 1.
  • (1969). Anisminic v. Foreign Compensation Commission.
  • (2006). Archer Daniels Midland Ingredients Ltd v. Commission.
  • (1993). As a note-worthy one, see Hanover Potato Products Inc v. E Shalala.
  • (1982). Case 52/81 Faust v. Commission.
  • (1948). Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v. Wednesbury Corporation.
  • (1948). Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd. v. Wednesbury Corporation.
  • (2007). Associated Society of Locomotive Engineers and Firemen v. United Kingdom.
  • (2003). Association of British Civilian Internees-Far East Region v. Secretary of State for Defence.
  • (2007). Attorney-General.
  • (2007). Attorney-General.
  • (2005). Audit Commission v. Ealing Council.
  • (1991). Autio v. Finland.
  • Avila, Humberto. (2007). Theory of Legal Principles. Springer. Netherlands.
  • Azoulay, Loïc. (2002). Good Governance in Europe’s Integrated Market. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • Badura, Peter,Erichsen, Hans-Uwe. (1988). Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht. V. W. de Gruyter. Berlin.
  • Bailey, S. H.. (2005). Cases, Materials and Commentary on Administrative Law. Sweet & Maxwell. London.
  • (1962). Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186.
  • Bamforth, Nicholas,Leyland, Peter. (2013). Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • (1989). Barberà, Messegué and Jabardo v. Spain.
  • Barbier de la Serre, Eric. (2006). Procedural Justice in the European Community Case-law Concerning the Rights of the Defence: Essentialist...
  • Barker, Kit,Jensen, Darryn. (2013). Private Law. Key Encounters with Public Law. Cambridge University Press. London.
  • (1953). Barnard v. National Dock Labour Board.
  • (1953). Barnard v. National Dock Labour Board.
  • (1991). Barnet Council, ex p Johnson.
  • (2007). BASF and UCB v. Commission.
  • Beckett, Julia. (2010). Public Management and the Rule of Law. M. E. Sharpe. London.
  • (2004). Belize Alliance of Conservation Non-Governmental Organisations v. Department of the Environment.
  • Bernal, Carlos. (2012). Legal Argumentation Theory. Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives. Springer. London.
  • Bickel, A.. (2011). The Least Dangerous Branch: the Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Yale University Press.
  • Bockenforde, E. W.. (1991). State, Society and Liberty. Berg. Berlin.
  • Borchard, Edwin Montefiore. (2013). Declaratory Judgments. The classics Us.
  • Borowski, Martin. (2010). The Structure of Formal Principles-Robert Alexy’s Law of Combination. On the Nature of Legal Principles.
  • Borowski, Martin. (2007). Grundrechte als Prinzipien. Nomos. Baden-Baden.
  • (1999). Bow Street Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte.
  • (1998). Bowman v. United Kingdom.
  • Brandt, Jürgen. (2009). Handbuch Verwaltungsverfahren und Verwaltungsprozess. C.F. Müller. Hamburg.
  • (1952). Briggs v. Elliott, 342 U.S. 350.
  • (1991). Brind and others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department.
  • Brown, L. N.. (1998). French Administrative Law. Clarendon. Oxford.
  • (2007). Bukta v. Hungary.
  • BVerwGE 34.
  • Bydlinski, Franz. (2011). Juristische Methodenlehre und Rechtsbegriff.
  • (1997). C-139/95 Balestra.
  • (1999). C-149/96 Portugal v. Council.
  • (2003). C-194/99 Thyssen Stahl AG v Commission of the European Communities.
  • (1993). C-334/92 Wagner Miret.
  • (1995). C-415/93 Bosman.
  • (1994). C-91/92 Faccini Dori.
  • (1989). Canadian Association of industrial, Mechanical and Allied Workers, Local 14 v. Paccar of. Canada Ltd..
  • Cane, Peter. (2011). Administrative Law. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • Cane, Peter. (2009). Administrative Tribunals and Adjudication. Hart Publishing. Oxford.
  • Cane, Peter. (2016). Controlling Administrative Power. An Historical Comparison. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
  • Carroll, Alex. (2009). Constitutional and Administrative Law. Longman. Munich.
  • (1995). Case 11/70 Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH v. Einfuhr-und Vorratsstelle für Getreide.
  • (1987). Case 265/85 van den Bergh en Jurgen v. Commission.
  • (1978). Case 34/77. Josef Oslizlok v. Commission.
  • (1965). Case 4/64 Chambre Syndicale de la Siderurgie Francaise.
  • (2003). Case C-170/02 P-Schlüsselverlag J.S. Moser and Others v. Commission.
  • (2006). Case T-395/04 Air One v. Commission.
  • (1987). Case C-222/84, Johnston v Chief Constable, RUC.
  • (1991). Case C-269/90, Technische Universität München v. Hauptzollamt München-Mitte.
  • (2009). Case C-345/06 Heinrich,.
  • (2004). Case C-501/00 Kingdom of Spain v. Commission.
  • (1983). Case C-96/82 IAZ v Commission.
  • (1997). Case T-105/95 WWF UK v Commission.
  • (1998). Case T-147/97 Champion Stationery Mfg Co. Ltd, Sun Kwong Metal Manufacturer Co. Ltd and US Ring Binder Corporation v Council of the...
  • (1999). Case T-188/97 Rothmans International BV (supported by Sweden) v European Commission.
  • (2006). Case T-204/03 Haladjian Frères SA v. Commission.
  • (2003). Case T-344/00 CEVA and Pharmacia entreprises v Commission.
  • (2005). Case T-347/03 Branco v. Commission.
  • Cassese, Sabino,D’Alterio, Elisa. (2016). Introduction: the development of Global Administrative Law. Research Handbook on Global Administrative...
  • (2002). Charles v. Judicial and Legal Service Commission and another.
  • (2007). Chief Constable.
  • (1990). C-I06/89 Marleasing.
  • Claus-Wilhelm, Canaris. (1983). Systemdenken und Systembegriff in der Jurisprudenz. Duncker & Humblot. Berlin.
  • (1821). Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S.264.
  • Cohn, Margit. (2010). Three Aspects of Proportionality. 8thWorld Congress of the International Association of Constitutional Law (IACL).
  • Connolly, Niamh. (2016). The Common Law of Obligations: Divergence and Unity. Hart Publishing. Oxford.
  • (1982). Conseil d’Etat.
  • (1988). Conseil d’Etat.
  • Corbí, Marià. (2015). Principles of an Epistemology of Values: The permutation of collective cohesion and motivation. Springer. London.
  • (1985). Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service.
  • (1985). Council of Civil Service Unions v. Minister for the Civil Service.
  • Cox, Peter. Development Studies. Atlantic Publishers. New Dehli.
  • Craig, P. P.. (2003). Administrative Law. Sweet & Maxwell. London.
  • Cross, Frank B.,Lindquist, Stefanie A.. (2007). The Scientific Study of Judicial Activism. University of Minnesota Law Review. 91.
  • Curtin, Deirdre,Wessel, Ramses A.. (2005). Good Governance and the European Union: Reflections on Concepts, Institutions and Substance. Intersentia...
  • D’Amato, Anthony. (2010). Judicial Legislation. Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons.
  • (2005). Dansk Rorindustri and Others v. Commission.
  • De Béchillon, M.. (1998). La Notion de Principe Général en Droit Privé. U.P. d’AixMarseille. Paris.
  • De Leo, John. (2008). Administrative Law. Cengage Learning. Sydney.
  • (1976). Defrenne v. Sabena.
  • Dicey, A. V.. (2009). Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Lightning Source. Oxford.
  • Dorrien, Gary. (2009). Social Ethics in the Making. Interpreting an American Tradition. Wiley & Blackweil. London.
  • (2003). Douglas v. Hello.
  • Douglas, Roger. (2012). Public Sector Ethics: Finding and Implementing Values. Routledge. New York.
  • (1855). Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393, 1857; Murray v. Hoboken Land, 59 U.S. 272.
  • Duff, Antony,Duff, R. A.. (2003). Punishment, Communication, and Community. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • Dworkin, Ronald. (1977). Taking Rights Seriously. Harvard University Press. Harvard.
  • (1988). Eccles, McPhillips and McShane v. Ireland.
  • (1977). Education Secretary v Tameside Council.
  • Edward, W.. (2000). The Constitution and the New Deal. Harvard University Press.
  • Ehlers, Dirk. (2009). Rechtsschutz im Öffentlichen Recht. Walter de Gruyter. Berlin.
  • Elliott, Mark,Varuhas, Jason. (2017). Administrative Law . Text and Materials. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • Enderlein, Wolfgang. (1992). Abwagung In Recht Und Moral. Alber. Munich.
  • Endicott, Timothy. (2015). Administrative Law. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • (1765). Entick v. Carrington.
  • (1986). Environment Secretary, ex p Nottinghamshire County Council.
  • (2005). Fadeyeva v. Russia.
  • Forsyth, Christopher,Wade, William. (2009). Administrative Law. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • Fox-Decent, Evan. (2015). Private Law and the Rule of Law. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • Freedland, Mark,Auby, Jean-Bernard. (2006). The Public Law/Private Law Divide: Une entente assez cordiale?. Bloomsbury Publishing. Oxford.
  • Funk, William F.,Seamon, Richard H.. (2008). Administrative Law : Examples and Explanations. Aspen Publishers. New York.
  • Funk, William F.,Shapiro, Sidney A.,Russell, L.. (2010). Weaver, Administrative Procedure and Practice: Problems and Cases. West. London.
  • (1989). G v. Federal Republic of Germany.
  • Galligan, Denis James. (1996). Due Process and Fair Procedures: A Study of Administrative Procedures. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
  • (2007). Galstyan v. Armenia.
  • Jèze, Gaston Paul Amédée. (1936). Les principes généraux du droit administratif. Théorie générale des contrats de l’administration. M. Giard....
  • Gersdorf, Hubertus. (2014). Verwaltungsprozessrecht. C.F. Müller. Hamburg.
  • (2005). Girling v. Parole Board.
  • Glanville, L.. (2011). The Antecedents of Sovereignty as Responsibility. European Journal of International Relations. 17.
  • Gormley, Laurence W.. (2008). General Principles of EC Law in a Process of Development. Kluwer Law International. New York.
  • Grimheden, J.. (2016). Human Rights and Good Governance. Brill. Boston.
  • (1993). Hadjianastassiou v. Greece.
  • Hall, James Parker. (2009). Constitutional Law. Biblio-Bazaar. Charleston.
  • Hall, Jerome. (2010). General Principles of Criminal Law. Lawbook Exchange. New York.
  • (1963). Hanks v. Minister of Housing and Local Government.
  • Harlow, Carol,Rawlings, Richard. (1997). Law and Administration. Cambridge University Press. London.
  • Hart, H. L. A.. (1994). The Concept of Law. Clarendon. Oxford.
  • Hartnett, Tim. (2013). Consensus-Oriented Decision-Making: the CODM Model for Facilitating Groups to Widespread Agreement. New Society Publishers....
  • (2000). Hashman and Harrup v. United Kingdom.
  • (1992). Hazell v. Hammersmith and Fulham Council.
  • (1992). Health Secretary, ex p US Tobacco International Inc.
  • (1933). Hendon Rural District Council, ex parte Chorley.
  • Herring, Jonathan. (2014). Criminal Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • Hesse, Joachim Jens,Ellwein, Ingrid. (2013). Das Regierungssystem der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Band 2: Materialien. Springer-Verlag. Munich....
  • (1994). Higher Education Funding Council, ex p Institute of Dental Surgery.
  • Hilf, G. Ciesla,Pache, E.. (1991). European Community: Methods of Protection. Nomos. Baden-Baden.
  • Hoffman, Lord. (1999). The Principle of Proportionality in the Laws of Europe. Hart Publishing. Oxford.
  • Hofmann, Herwig C. H.,Rowe, Gerard C.,Türk, Alexander H.. (2011). Administrative Law and Policy of the European Union. Oxford University Press....
  • Hofmann, Herwig C. H.,Schneider, Jens-Peter,Ziller, Jacques. (2014). Model Rules on EU Administrative Procedure. ReNEUAL.
  • (1973). Holtzman v. Schlesinger-414 US 1316.
  • (2001). Home Secretary.
  • (2005). Home Secretary.
  • (2005). Home Secretary.
  • (2001). Home Secretary, ex p Hindley.
  • (2001). Home Secretary, ex p P and Q.
  • (1998). Home Secretary, ex p Venables.
  • (1998). Home Secretary, ex p Venables.
  • Horrigan, Bryan. (1998). Government Law and Policy: Commercial Aspects. Federation Press. Sydney.
  • Hudson, Alastair. (2016). Equity and Trusts. Routledge. London.
  • (1982). Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex p National Federation of Self-employed and Small Businesses Ltd.
  • (1986). Inner London Education Authority, ex parte Westminster City Council.
  • (1985). Johansen v. Norway.
  • (1993). Jones v. University of Manchester.
  • (2007). Jorgic v. Germany.
  • (2015). Kanthasamy v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration).
  • Katz, Robert L.. (2008). Skills of an Effective Administrator. Harvard Business Review Press. Boston.
  • (1986). Kaufman v. Belgium.
  • Kaufmann, Marcel. (1997). Politische Gestaltungsfreiheit als Rechtsprinzip. Staatswissenschaften und Staatspraxis. 8.
  • (2007). Khamidov v. Russia.
  • Kingsbury, Benedict,Krisch, Nico,Stewart, Richard B.. (2004). The Emergence of Global Administrative Law. New York University School of Law....
  • Klement, Jan Henrik. (2012). Institutionalized Reason. The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • Kmiec, Keenan D.. (2004). The Origin and Current Meanings of Judicial Activism. California Law Review. 92.
  • Kramer, Matthew H.. (2004). On the Moral Status of the Rule of Law. Cambridge Law Journal. 63.
  • Kramer, Matthew H.. (2003). In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law without Trimmings. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • Kriegel, Barret. (1992). Dictionnaire constitutionnel. Puf. Paris.
  • Ku, J.,Yoo, John. (2013). Globalization and Sovereignty. Berkeley Journal of International Law. 31.
  • Künnecke, Marina. (2007). Tradition and Change in Administrative Law : An Anglo-German Comparison. Springer. Berlin.
  • La Torre, Massimo. (2015). Judicial Activism. An Interdisciplinary Approach to the American and European Experiences. Springer. London.
  • (1970). Lavender & Son Ltd v. Minister of Housing.
  • Lebreton, Gilles. (2007). Droit administratif general. dalloz. Paris.
  • Lederer, M.. (2005). Criticizing Global Governance. Palgrave Macmillan. New York.
  • Leisner, Walter. (1975). L’Etat de droit, une contradiction, Melanges Eisenmann. Cujas. Paris.
  • Lewis, Clive,Knight, Christopher. (2004). Judicial Remedies in Public Law. Sweet & Maxwell. London.
  • Locke, John. (1988). Two Treaties of Government. Cambridge University Press. London.
  • Loschak, D.. (1981). Le principe de légalité. Mythe et mystification, Actualité juridique, Droit administratif.
  • Lunney, Mark,Oliphant, Ken. (2013). Tort Law: Text and Materials. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • (1849). Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. 1.
  • Magrish, James L.. (1953). Judicial Legislation, by Fred V. Cahill. Indiana Law Journal. 28.
  • (1979). Malone v. Metropolitan Police Commissioner.
  • Manfredi, Christopher,Rush, Mark. (2013). Judging Democracy. University of Toronto Press. Toronto.
  • Mashaw, J. L.. (1983). Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims. Yale University Press. London.
  • Mashaw, Jerry L.. (1985). Due Process in the Administrative State. Yale University Press. California.
  • Mason, Sir Anthony,Lindell, Geoffrey. (2007). The Mason Papers. Selected Articles and Speeches. Federation Press.
  • Matei, Lucica,Vašiček, Davor,Kaštelan-Mrak, Marija. (2011). European Administrative Space. Balkan Realities.
  • Maurer, Hartmut. (2017). Allgemeines Verwaltungsrecht. V. W. de Gruyter. Berlin.
  • McIntyre Cooley, Thomas. (2016). The General Principles of Constitutional Law in the United States of America. BiblioLife. New York.
  • Meenu, Roy. (2007). Good Governance and Administrative Practices. Mittal Publications. New Delhi.
  • (1986). Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd.
  • (2004). Mistra and Srivastava.
  • (1965). Mixnam’s Properties Ltd v Chertsey UDC.
  • Moses, Margaret L.. (2011). Beyond Judicial Activism: When the Supreme Court is nNo Longer a court. Journal of Constitutional Law. 14.
  • Natelson, Robert G.. (1990). Reasonableness in Private Law: the Special Case of the Property Owners. Ohio Law Journal. 51.
  • Nehl, Hanns Peter. (2009). Legal Challenges in EU Administrative Law : Towards an Integrated Administration. Edward Elgar Publishing. Cheltenham....
  • (2004). Newham London Borough Council, ex parte Sacupima.
  • (2001). North and East Devon Health Authority, ex p Coughlan.
  • (1952). Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribunal, ex parte Shaw.
  • (1983). O’Reilly, Ex parte Australena Investments.
  • (1994). Otto Preminger Institut v. Austria.
  • (1996). Palumbo v. Italy.
  • (2008). Parole Board.
  • Peeters, Marjan. (2005). Judicial Lawmaking and Administrative Law. Intersentia. Oxford.
  • Petoft, Arian,Jamshidi, Alireza. Citizens’ Rights in the Light of Modern Administrative Procedures. Bioethics Journal Quarterly. 6. 23
  • Petoft, Arian,Markaz-malmiri, Ahmeh. (2016). Concept and Scope of the General Principles of Administrative Law and Referring Possibility in...
  • Petoft, Arian,Vijeh, Mohammadreza. (2016). A Foucauldian Analysis of Post-Modern Concept of Sovereignty in the Light of Public Law. Journal...
  • Petoft, Arian,Vijeh, Mohammadreza. (2017). Due Process of Law in the United States Judicial Review. Shiraz University Journal of Legal Studies....
  • Petoft, Arian,Vijeh, Mohammadreza. (2015). The Evolution of Government Intervention in the Economy from the Perspective of Public Law, Welfare...
  • Petoft, Arian. (2017). Reviewing the Law of Balancing and Subsumption with the Legal Proposition Factor in the Structure of Principles and...
  • (2002). Phalam Gurung v. Ministry of Defence.
  • (1995). Piermont v France.
  • Ponce Solé, J.. (2002). Good Administration and European Public Law: the Fight for Quality in the Field of Administrative Decisions. European...
  • Prakke, L.,Kortmann, C. A. J. M.,van den Brandhof, J. C. E.. (2004). Constitutional Law of 15 EU Member States. Kluwer. London.
  • (1984). Pretto v. Italy A 71.
  • (1986). Public Service Board of New South Wales v Ormond.
  • (2010). R (on the application of Saeedi) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department.
  • Raabe, Marias. (1994). Allgemeinheit der Grundrechte und Vielfalt der Gesellschaft. Kohlhammer. Stuttgart.
  • Raabe, Marias. (1998). Grundrechte und Erkenntnis: Der Einschätzungsspielraum des Gesetzgebers. Nomos. Baden-Baden.
  • (1975). Race Relations Board.
  • (1941). Railroad Comm’n of Texas v. Pullman Co.-312 U.S. 496.
  • Raitio, Juha. (2008). General Principles of EC Law in a Process of Development. Kluwer Law International. New York.
  • Ratio, Juha. (2014). The Principle of Legal Certainty in EC Law. Springer. London.
  • Ray, Samirendra Nath. (1974). Judicial Review and Fundamental Rights. Eastern Law House. New Delhi.
  • Raymond Pfeiffer, Ralph Forsberg. (2013). Ethics on the Job: Cases and Strategies. Cengage Learning.
  • Raz, Joseph. (1994). Ethics in the Public Domain. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
  • Raz, Joseph. (1980). The Concept of a Legal System. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
  • Raz, Joseph. (2009). The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality. Clarendon Press. Oxford.
  • Raz, Joseph. (1993). On the Autonomy of Legal Reasoning. Ratio Juris. 6.
  • (1997). Regina v. Gloucestershire County Council, ex parte Barry.
  • Reich, Norbert. (2014). General Principles of EU Civil Law. Intersentia. London.
  • (1992). Richmond upon Thames Council, ex p McCarthy and Stone Ltd.
  • (2005). Rimmington.
  • Robert, Thomas. (2000). Legitimate Expectations and Proportionality in Administrative Law. Hart Publishing. Oxford.
  • (1925). Roberts v. Hopwood.
  • Röhl, K. F.. (1993). Verfahrensgerechtigkeit (Procedural Justice) Einführung in den Themenbereich und Überblick. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie....
  • Rose, J.. (2004). The Rule of Law in the Western World: An Overview. Journal of Social Philosophy. 35.
  • Rose-Ackerman, Susan,Lindseth, Peter L.. (2010). Comparative Administrative Law. Edward Elgar Publishing. London.
  • (2000). Rowe v. United Kingdom.
  • (2003). Rushbridger v. Attorney-General.
  • Sanne, Taekema. (2003). The Concept of Ideals in Legal Theory.
  • Scheb, John. (2004). Law and the Administrative Process. Cengage Learning. London.
  • (1988). Schenk v. Switzerland.
  • (1969). Schmidt v. Secretary of State for Home Affairs.
  • Schmitt Glaeser, Walter. (1984). Die Position der Bürger als Beteiligte im Entscheidungsverfahren gestaltender Verwaltung. Verfahren als Staats-...
  • Schoch, Friedrich. (1992). Der Verfahrensgedanke im Allgemeinen Verwaltungsrecht. Die Verwaltung. 25.
  • Scholte, J. A.. (2000). Globalization: A Critical Introduction. Palgrave Macmillan. New York.
  • Schwartz, Bernard. (1954). French Administrative Law and the Common-Law World. The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd..
  • Schwarze, J.. (1999). Das Verwaltungsrecht unter europäischem Einfluß. Nomos. Baden-Baden.
  • Schwarze, Jürgen. (2006). European Administrative Law. The European Communities Publications.
  • Schwenker, Uwe. (2013). Öffentliches Baurecht in Baden-Württemberg: für Ausbildung und Praxis in der Kommunalverwaltung. Epubli. Berlin.
  • (2005). Secretary of State for Education and Employment.
  • (2000). Secretary of State for Employment, ex parte begble.
  • (2001). Secretary of State for Health, ex parte L (M).
  • (1990). Secretary of State for Social Services, ex parte Stitt.
  • (2001). Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions.
  • (2004). Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant) ex parte Uttley (Respondent).
  • (1991). Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Brind.
  • (1985). Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Findlay.
  • (2000). Secretary of State for Trade and Industry.
  • (1988). Port Talbot Council, ex p Jones.
  • Siltala, Raimo. (2000). A Theory of Precedent: from Analytical Positivism to a Postanalytical Philosophy of Law. Hart Publishing. Oxford.
  • Seerden, René,Stroink, F. A. M.. (2002). Administrative Law of the European Union, Its Member States and the United States. A Comparative...
  • Shapiro, Scott J.. (2007). The Hart-Dworkin Debate: a short Guide for the Perplexed.
  • Shlapentokh, Vladimir,Beasley, Eric. (2013). Restricting Freedoms: Limitations on the Individual in Contemporary America. Transaction Publishers....
  • Sieckmann, Jan-Reinard. (2009). Grundrechte, Prinzipien und Argumentation. Nomos. Baden-Baden.
  • Sieckmann, JanReinard. (2009). Regelmodelle und Prinzipienmodelle des Rechtssystems. Nomos. Baden-Baden.
  • Siltala, Raimo. (2000). A Theory of Precedent. From Analytical Positivism to a Post-analytical Philosophy of Law. Hart Publishing. Oxford.
  • (1995). Somerset CC, ex p Fewings.
  • (1995). Somerset County Council, ex parte Fewings and others.
  • (1995). Spadea v. Italy.
  • (2005). Steel and Morris v. United Kingdom.
  • Steiner, Udo. (2006). Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht: ein Lehrbuch. C.F. Müller. Berlin.
  • Stolleis, M.. (1992). Geschichte des öffentlichen Rechts, Zweiter Band, Staatsrechtslehre und Verwaltungswissenschaft 1800-1914. V. W. de...
  • Stone Sweet, Alec,Mathews, Jud. Reasonableness and Law. Springer. New York.
  • Stroink, F. A. M.. (2005). Judicial Lawmaking and Administrative Law. Intersentia. Oxford.
  • (2006). Swindon NHS Primary Care Trust.
  • Sykes, Edward I.. (1997). General Principles of Administrative Law. Butterworths. London.
  • Sykes, Edward I.,Lanham, David J.,Tracey, Richard R. S.. (1989). General Principles of Administrative Law. Butterworths.
  • Thompson, Brian,Gordon, Michael. (2014). Cases and Materials on Constitutional and Administrative Law. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • (1988). Tower Hamlets Council, ex p Chetnik Developments Ltd.
  • (1989). Trade Secretary, ex p Lonrho plc.
  • Tribe, Laurence H.. (1978). American Constitutional Law. Foundation Press. New York.
  • Tridimas, Takis. (2013). The General Principles of EU Law. Oxford. Oxford University Press.
  • (2015). Trinity Western University v. The Law Society of British Columbia.
  • Tushnet, Mark,Fleiner, Thomas,Saunders, Cheryl. (2013). Routledge Handbook of Constitutional Law. Routledge. USA.
  • (2005). Ukrainian Media Group v. Ukraine.
  • (1995). C-431/93 van Schijndel.
  • Veggeland, Noralv. (2009). Taming the Regulatory State: Politics and Ethics. Edward Elgar Publishing. Cheltenham.
  • (2001). Venables v. News group.
  • (1996). Vogt v. Germany.
  • (1990). W v. Egdell.
  • Wacks, Raymond. (2006). Philosophy of Law. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • (1965). Webb v. Minister of Housing and Local Government.
  • Webley, Lisa,Samuels, Harriet. (2012). Complete Public Law. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • (1988). Weeks v. United Kingdom.
  • Weeks, Greg. (2016). Soft Law and Public Authorities: Remedies and Reform. Bloomsbury Publishing. Oxford.
  • (1905). Westminster Corporation v London and North Western Railway Co Ltd.
  • (1985). Wheeler v. Leicester City Council.
  • (1939). White and Collins v. Minister of Health.
  • Willcox Seidman, Ann,Seidman, Robert B.,Abeyesekere, Nalin. (2001). Legislative Drafting for Democratic Social Change: A Manual for Drafters....
  • Wittern, Andreas,Basslsperger, Maximilian. (2007). Verwaltungs-und Verwaltungsprozessrecht: Grundriss für Ausbildung und Praxis. W. Kohlhammer...
  • Wolf, Susan,Stanley, Neil. (2013). Wolf and Stanley on Environmental Law. Routledge. London.
  • Würtenberger, Thomas. (1991). Akzeptanz durch Verwaltungsverfahren. NJW.
  • (1999). Yanner v. Eaton.
  • Yves, Gaudemet. (1979). Droit administratif général: Licence 2e année. les Cours de droit.