Acceso usuarios
Roberto Muhájir Rahnemay Rabbani, Gabriela Narezi, Allívia Rouse Carregosa Rabbani, Emilia Rahnemay Kohlman Rabbani
Rich in natural resources, Brazil is a country of continental proportions facing major social problems, many of which linked to the unequal distribution of land. In this regard, much land in Brazil fails to meet the principles of rational and adequate use, in terms of productivity, preservation of the environment, and labor relations. This article outlines the legal framework governing the socioenvironmental function of property in Brazil and examines how the interested parties in land disputes in the south of the State of Bahia have reached a peaceful consensual solution to conflict. Based on this analysis, we present a model that can be applied to similar disputes. We conducted a review of relevant laws and judicial decisions and analyzed documents relating to disputes between the forestry company Veracel Celulose S.A. and family farmer associations between 2009 and 2016. Our findings show that, despite the fact that the normative base of the settlements is effectively grounded in the notion of the social function of property, absolutely no mention of the principle was made by the parties and legal actors during the process or in the agreements: the solution came about as the result of a consensus reached by two interested parties. This could therefore be said to be a case of “judicial redundancy”, whereby the key underlying legal principles relating to the social function of property were fulfilled without resorting to the courts.
