Phrasal Discourse Style in Cross-Disciplinary Writing: A Comparison of Phrasal Complexity Features in the Results Sections of Research Articles

• Muhammed Parviz ^[1] ; Alireza Jalilifar ^[1] ; Alexanne Don ^[2]
  1. [1] Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

     Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

     Irán

     
  2. [2] University of New South Wales
• Localización: Círculo de lingüística aplicada a la comunicación, ISSN-e 1576-4737, Nº. 83, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Multilingüismo en las universidades chinas), págs. 191-204
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.5209/clac.70573
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • The present study aimed at exploring how research article writers from two academic disciplines exploit phrasal complexity features (PCFs) to verbalize the results sections of research articles with the eventual aim of assisting advanced EFL writers with their composition strategies. To this end, following a manual search, 200 empirical research articles in the fields of Applied Linguistics and Physics were comparatively examined. Due to the low rate of success of tagging programs in identifying the occurrences of PCFs, the datasets were also manually analyzed. The results revealed that the research article writers drew upon three high-frequency phrasal complexity features, namely, pre-modifying adjectives, post-modifying prepositional phrases, and nominalizations. The study also revealed that the results sections of research articles included different amounts of exceedingly complex patterns of pre-modification, a hybrid of novel appositive structures, and great reliance on hyphenated adjectives. Overall, we believe that these findings can be used to heighten the awareness of academic writers and instructors regarding the linguistic characteristics of academic writing and of the variations of how such phrasal features of compression are constructed in different academic subjects.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Ansarifar, A., Shahriari, H., & Pishghadam, R. (2018). Phrasal complexity in academic writing: A comparison of abstracts written by graduate...
  • Basturkmen, H. (2009). Commenting on results in published research articles and masters dissertations in language teaching. Journal of English...
  • Becher, T. (1994). The significance of disciplinary differences. Studies in Higher Education, 19(2), 151- 161.
  • Bhatia, V., K. (2008a): Genre Analysis, ESP, and Professional Practice. English for Specific Purposes 27, 161-174.
  • Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2010). Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness. Journal of English...
  • Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2011). Grammar emerging in the noun phrase: The influence of written language use. English Language and Linguistics...
  • Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2013). Being specific about historical change: The influence of sub-register. Journal of English Linguistics, 41(2),...
  • Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Grammatical complexity in academic English: Linguistic change in writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University...
  • Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
  • Brett, P. (1994). A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13(1), 47-59.
  • Cargill, M., & O'Connor, P. (2009). Writing scientific research articles: Strategy and steps. UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  • Coffin, C., North, S., & Donohue, J. (2009). Exploring grammar: From formal to functional. Routledge.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  • Doran., Y.J. (2018). The discourse of physics: Building knowledge through language, mathematics and image. New York: Routledge.
  • Gray, B. (2015). Linguistic variation in research articles: When discipline tells only part of the story. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing...
  • Gray, B., & Biber, D. (2018). Academic writing as a locus of grammatical change: The development of phrasal complexity features. In Studies...
  • Halliday, M.A.K. & Martin, J.R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: The Falmer Press.
  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1998). Things and relations: Regrammaticizing experience as technical knowledge. In J. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading...
  • Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
  • Hyland, K. (2009a). Academic discourse: English in a global context. London: Bloomsbury.
  • Jalilifar, A., White, P., & Malekizadeh, N. (2017). Exploring nominalization in scientific textbooks: A cross-disciplinary study of hard...
  • Kanoksilapatham, B. (2015). Distinguishing textual features characterizing structural variation in research articles across three engineering...
  • Lan, G., & Sun, Y. (2019). A corpus-based investigation of noun phrase complexity in the L2 writings of a first-year composition course....
  • Le, T. N. P., & Harrington, M. (2015). Phraseology used to comment on results in the Discussion section of applied linguistics quantitative...
  • Lim, J. M. H. (2010). Commenting on research results in applied linguistics and education: A comparative genre-based investigation. Journal...
  • Lim, J. M. H. (2011b). Paving the way for research findings: Writers’ rhetorical choices in education and applied linguistics. Discourse Studies,...
  • Maton, K., & Doran, Y. (2017). Semantic density: A translation device for revealing complexity of knowledge practices in discourse, part...
  • Montgomery, S.L. (1996). The scientific voice. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Noguera, Y., & Pérez-Paredes, P. (2018). Register analysis and ESP pedagogy: noun-phrase modification in a corpus of English for Military...
  • Starfield, S., & Paltridge, B. (2020). Thesis and dissertation writing in a second language: A handbook for students and their supervisors....
  • Swan, M. (2016). Practical English Usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Parkinson, J., & Musgrave, J. (2014). Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for academic purposes students....
  • Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30(4), 479-497.
  • Ruan, Z. (2018). Structural compression in academic writing: An English-Chinese comparison study of complex noun phrases in research article...
  • Ruiying, Y., & Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific...
  • Sheldon, E. (2013). The research article: a rhetorical and functional comparison of texts created by native and non-native English writers...
  • Staples, S., Egbert, J., Gray, B., & Biber, D. (2016). Academic writing development at the university level: Phrasal and clausal complexity...
  • Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  • Thompson., D. K. (1993). Arguing for experimental “facts” in science: A study of research article results sections in biochemistry. Written...
  • Wallwark, A. (2011). English for writing research papers. New York: Springer.
  • Wilkenson, A. M. (1991). The scientist’s handbook for writing papers and dissertations. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Williams, I. (1999). Results section of medical research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18(4), 347- 366.