Using Realist Interviews to Improve Theory on the Mechanisms and Outcomes of Sport for Development Programmes

• Kirsten Verkooijen ^[1] ; Super, Sabina ^[1] ; Mulderij, Lisanne Sofie ^[1] ; de Jager, Dico ^[1] ; Wagemakers, Annemarie ^[1]
  1. [1] Wageningen UR

     Wageningen UR

     Países Bajos

     
• Localización: Social Inclusion, ISSN-e 2183-2803, Vol. 8, Nº. 3, 1, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Sport for Development: Opening Transdisciplinary and Intersectoral Perspectives), págs. 152-161
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.17645/si.v8i3.2747
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen

  • The complex nature of Sport for Development (SfD) programmes makes impact evaluation challenging. Realist evaluation has been proposed as a new, theory-driven approach to evaluate complex programmes. The present study aimed to explore the value of conducting realist interviews to gain improved insight into the mechanisms and outcomes of three SfD programmes in the Netherlands: a programme that promotes sports participation among socially vulnerable youth; a combined lifestyle intervention for adults of low social economic status; and a sports-based programme for marginalised adults. In addition, the study aimed to investigate the applicability of a conceptual model from the field of social enterprise (Roy, Baker, & Kerr, 2017) as the preliminary programme theory for those interviews. First, for each programme, a realist interview was conducted with one researcher as the key informant. Thereafter, the findings from and experiences with the individual realist interviews were discussed among the informants in a group meeting. The results revealed that the conceptual model functioned well as preliminary programme theory for the SfD programmes. The realist interviews contributed to theoretical awareness and trustworthiness. Importantly, the interviews highlighted knowledge gaps and generated ideas for programme improvement. Hence, the realist interview technique is recommended as a methodological tool to generate, validate, and improve programme theory in the field of SfD. This study had, however, an explorative character, and more research is needed to confirm and generalize the findings and to learn how a greater number of stakeholders might contribute to this type of realist evaluation.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Caló, F., Roy, M. J., Donaldson, C., Teasdale, S., & Bagioni, S. (2019). Exploring the contribution of social enterprise to health and...
  • Chalip, L. (2006). Toward a distinctive sport management discipline. Journal of Sport Management, 20, 1–21.
  • Coalter, F. (2007). A wider social role for sport: Who’s keeping the score? London: Routledge.
  • Coalter, F. (2012). ‘There is loads of relationships here’: Developing a programme theory for sport-for-change programmes. International Review...
  • Gould, D., & Carson, S. (2008). Life skills development through sport: Current status and future directions. International Review of Sport...
  • Haudenhuyse, R., Theeboom, M., & Nols, Z. (2013). Sports-based interventions for socially vulnerable youth: Towards well-defined interventions...
  • Herens, M., Wagemakers, A., Vaandrager, L., van Ophem, J., & Koelen M. (2017). Contexts, mechanisms, and outcomes that matter in Dutch...
  • Jagosh, J., Bush, P. L., Salsberg, J., Macauley, A. C., Greenhalgh, T., Wong, G., . . . Pluye, P. (2015). A realist evaluation of community-based...
  • Jolley, G. (2014). Evaluating complex community-based health promotion: Addressing the challenges. Evaluation and Program Planning, 45, 71–81.
  • Kerlin, J. A. (2013). Defining social enterprise across different contexts: A conceptual framework based on institutional factors. Nonprofit...
  • Lyras, A., & Welty Peachey, J. W. (2011). Integrating sportfor- development theory and praxis. Sport Management Review, 14(4), 311–326.
  • Manzano, A. (2016). The craft of interviewing in realist evaluation. Evaluation, 22(3), 342–360.
  • Mukumbang, F. C., Marchal, B., Van Belle, S., & van Wyk, B. (2019). Using the realist interview approach to maintain theoretical awareness...
  • Nols, Z., Haudenhuyse, R., & Theeboom, M. (2017). Urban sport-for-development initiatives and young people in socially vulnerable situations:...
  • Pawson, R. (1996). Theorizing the interview. The British Journal of Sociology, 47(2), 295–314.
  • Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Pawson, R., & Tilley, N. (1997). Realistic evaluation. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Roy, M. J., Baker, R., & Kerr, S. (2017). Conceptualising the public health role of actors operating outside of formal health systems:...
  • Sepulveda, L. (2015). Social enterprise—A new phenomenon in the field of economic and social welfare? Social Policy and Administration, 49(7),...
  • Sparkes, A. C., & Smith, B. (2014). Qualitative research methods in sport, exercise and health: From process to product. London: Routledge.
  • Super, S., Hermens, N. J., Verkooijen, K. T., & Koelen, M. A. (2014). Enhancing life prospects of socially vulnerable youth through sport...
  • Super, S., Wentink, C. Q., Verkooijen, K. T., & Koelen, M. A. (2017). Exploring the sports experiences of socially vulnerable youth. Social...
  • Van Koperen, T. M., Jebb, S. A., Summerbell, C. D., Visscher, T. L. S., Romon, M., Borys, J. M., & Seidell, J. C. (2013). Characterizing...
  • Wagemakers, A., Mulderij, L. S., Verkooijen, K. T., Groenewoud, S., & Koelen, M. A. (2018). Care-physical activity initiatives in the...
  • Weiss, C. H. (2000). Which links in which theories shall we evaluate? New Directions for Evaluation, 2000(87), 35–45.
  • Westhorp, G. (2014). Realist impact evaluation: An introduction. London: Overseas Development Institute.
  • Witt, P. A., & Crompton, J. L. (1997). The protective factors framework: A key to programming for benefits and evaluating results. Journal...
  • Wold, B., & Mittelmark, M. B. (2018). Health-promotion research over three decades: The social-ecological model and challenges in implementation...