Desde la eficiencia técnica económica hacia la eficiencia medioambiental

• Autores: Jesús Lucindo Blasco, Marisa Feijoo
• Localización: Esic market, ISSN 0212-1867, Nº 166, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Innovación en el sector agroalimentario), págs. 385-411
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.7200/esicm.166.0512.4
• Títulos paralelos:
  • The origin and development of the technical efficiency analysis in the economy an environmental viewpoint
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo  1    2  
• Resumen
  • español

    Objetivo: determinar el comportamiento técnicamente eficiente para cualquier agente de la economía siendo responsable de su actuación medioambiental.

    Metodología: revisión del estado del arte de la literatura del análisis de la eficiencia técnica desde una perspectiva medioambiental.

    Resultados: determinar un comportamiento para una economía y eficiencia ecológica con objeto de asumir un desarrollo sostenible.

    Limitaciones: dada la modelización teórica desarrollada, los principales inconvenientes son: no existencia con generalidad de modelos predictivos del coste del impacto medioambiental, no existencia de herramientas para recoger adecuadamente aquellos impactos que se retrasan en el tiempo y, por último, limitaciones a la hora de investigar la influencia de factores naturales incontrolables.

    Implicaciones prácticas: guías de actuación para individuos, empresas y Estados para satisfacer sus necesidades con el menor impacto en el medioambiente. Especial atención para suministrar la toma de decisiones de un estudio adecuado para el diseño apropiado de regulaciones medioambientales.

  • English

    Objective: Determine the technically efficient behavior for any agent in the economy, being responsible for its environmental performance.

    Methodology: Review of the state of the art of the literature on the analysis of technical efficiency an environmental perspective.

    Results: Determine a behavior for an economy and ecological efficiency in order to assume a sustainable development.

    Limitations: Given the theoretical modelling developed, the main drawbacks are: the non-presence in the predictive models of the cost of the environmental impact, the lack of tools to collect adequately those impacts that are delayed in time and, finally, the limitations to investigate the influence of the uncontrollable natural factors.

    Practical implications: Action guides for individuals, firms and states to meet their needs with the least impact on the environment. Special attention to supply to decision-makers with an adequate study for the proper design of environmental regulations.

  • 中文

    研究目的：为对环境负责的人士或组织确定有效益的行为。 分析方法：从环境角度回顾过往有关对技术效率进行的分析的文献现况。 研究结论：以实现可持续发展为目的，确定有利于经济和生态的行为 。 研究局限：鉴于已开发的理论模型，现时主要的缺点是：总体来说缺乏能预测环境影响成本的模型，同时也缺乏足够工具以充分收集那些延迟出现的影响。最后是，由于研究过程受到无法控制的自然因素影响而有所限制。 实际应用: 研究结果可以作为对个人、企业以及各国的指南，以对环境造成最少影响的情况下满足其需求，尤其是为决策提供方针，从适当的研究得出结论来有效制定有关环保的法规。

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Afriat, S. N., 1972, Efficiency estimation of production functions. International Economic Review, 13 (3), 568–597.
  • Aigner, D. J., y Chu, S. F., 1968, On estimating the industry production function. The American Economic Review, 58 (4), 826–839.
  • Aigner, D. J., Lovell, C. A. K., y Schmidt, P., 1977, Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal...
  • Arkelof, G. A., 1970, The market for “Lemons’’: Quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84 (3),...
  • Banker, R. D., y Morey, R. C., 1985, Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Operations Research, 34 (4), 513–521.
  • Banker, R. D., y Morey, R. C., 1986, The use of categorical variables in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 32 (12), 1613–1627.
  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., y Cooper, W. W., 1984, Some models for estimating of technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis....
  • Baumol, W. J., 1972, On taxation and the control of externalities. The American Economic Review, 62 (3), 307–322.
  • Camarero, M., Castillo, J., Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., y Tamarit, C., 2013, Eco – efficiency and convergence in OECD countries. Environmental and...
  • Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R., y Diewert, W. E., 1982, The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity....
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., y Rhodes, E., 1978, Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research,...
  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., y Rhodes, E., 1981, Evaluating program and managerial efficiency: An application of data envelopment analysis...
  • Coelli, T. J., y Rao, D. S. P., 2005, Total factor productivity growth in agriculture: a Malmquist index analysis of 93 countries, 1980–2000....
  • Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., Way, R., Jacobs, P., y Skuce, A., 2013, Quantifying the consensus...
  • Cullinane, K., Ji, P., y Wang, T., 2005, The relationship between privatization and DEA estimates of efficiency in the container port industry....
  • Du, D., Zhao, X., y Huang, R., 2017, The impact of climate change on developed economies. Economics Letters, 153, 43–46.
  • Dyckhoff, H., y Allen, K., 2001, Measuring ecological efficiency with data envelopment analysis (DEA). European Journal of Operational Research,...
  • Emrouznejad, A., Parker, B. R., y Tavares, G., 2008, Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first...
  • Färe, R., y Grosskopf, S., 2003, Nonparametric productivity analysis with undesirable outputs: Comment. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,...
  • Färe, R., y Lovell, C. A. K., 1978, Measuring the technical efficiency of production. Journal of Economic Theory, 19, 150–162.
  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. & Pasurka, C., 2007, Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy,...
  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A. K., y Pasurka, C., 1989, Multilateral productivity comparisons when some outputs are undesirable: A...
  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Lovell, C. A. K., y Yaisawarng, S., 1993, Derivation of shadow prices for undesirable outputs: A distance function...
  • Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M., y Zhang, Z., 1994, Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries....
  • Farrell, M. J., 1957, The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (General), 120 (3), 253–290....
  • Fried, H. O., Lovell, C. K., Schmidt, S. S., y Yaisawarng, S., 2002, Accounting for environmental effects and statistical noise in data envelopment...
  • Fried, H. O., Schmidt, S. S., y Yaisawarng, S., 1999, Incorporating the operating environment into a nonparametric measure of technical efficiency....
  • Grifell-Tatjé, E., y Lovell, C. A. K., 1995, A note on the Malmquist productivity index. Economics Letters, 47, 169–175.
  • Grossman, S. J. & Stiglitz, J. E., 1980, On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. The American Economic Review, 70 (3),...
  • Grosskopf, S., 1986, The role of the reference technology in measuring productive efficiency. The Economic Journal, 96, 499–513.
  • Hailu, A., 2003, Nonparametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: Reply. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85 (4),...
  • Hsiang, S., y Kopp, R. E., 2018, An economist’s guide to climate change science. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32 (4), 3–32. doi:10.1257/jep.32.4.3
  • Jeon, B. M., y Sickles, R. C., 2004, The role of environmental factors in growth accounting. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19, 567–591.
  • Koopmans, T. C., 1951, Efficient allocation of resources. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 19 (4), 455–465. Recuperado de:...
  • Korhonen, P. J., y Luptacik, M., 2004, Eco-efficiency analysis of power plants: An extension of data envelopment analysis. European Journal...
  • Kumar, S., 2006, Environmentally sensitive productivity growth: A global analysis using Malmquist–Luenberger index. Ecological Economics,...
  • Kuosmanen, T., 2005, Weak Disposability in Nonparametric Production Analysis with Undesirable Outputs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics,...
  • Leibenstein, H., 1966, Allocative efficiency vs. “X–efficiency”. The American Economic Review, 56 (3), 392–415.
  • Lozano, S., y Gutiérrez, E., 2008, Non-parametric frontier approach to modelling the relationships among population, GDP, energy consumption...
  • Macpherson, A. J., Principe, P. P., y Smith, E. R., 2010, A directional distance function approach to regional environmental–economic assessments....
  • Malmquist, S., 1953, Index numbers and indifference curves. Trabajos de Estadística, 4 (1), 209-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03006863
  • Meleddu, M., y Pulina, M., 2018, The efficiency of the public intervention on the environment: Evidence based on non-parametric and parametric...
  • Meeusen, W., y Den Broeck, J., 1977, Efficiency estimation from Cobb–Douglas production functions with composed error. International Economic...
  • Minsky, H., 1986, Stabilizing an unstable economy. Yale University Press.
  • Nordhaus, W. D., 1977, Economic growth and climate: the carbon dioxide problem. The American Economic Review, 67 (1), 341-346. Recuperado...
  • Pittman, R. W., 1983, Multilateral Productivity Comparisons with Undesirable Outputs. The Economic Journal, 93 (372), 883. doi:10.2307/2232753
  • Porter, M. E., y Linde, C., 1995, Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives,...
  • Sanz-Díaz, M. T., Velasco-Morente, F., Yñiguez, R., y Díaz-Calleja, E., 2017, An analysis of Spain’s global and environmental efficiency from...
  • Scheel, H., 2001, Undesirable outputs in efficiency valuations. European Journal of Operational Research, 132, 400–410.
  • Seiford, L. M., y Thrall, R. M., 1990, The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 7–38.
  • Seitz, W. D., 1970, The measurement of efficiency relative to a frontier production function. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52 (4), 505–511.
  • Sen, A., 1995, Rationality and social choice. The American Economic Review, 85 (1), 1–24.
  • Solow, R. M., 1957, Technical change and the aggregate production function. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 39 (3), 312–320.
  • Song, M., An, Q., Zhang, W., Wang, Z., y Wu, J., 2012, Environmental efficiency evaluation based on data envelopment analysis: A review. Renewable...
  • Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G. K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., y Midgley, P. M., 2013, Climate change 2013: The physical...
  • Sueyoshi, T., y Goto, M., 2012, DEA radial and non–radial models for unified efficiency under natural and managerial disposability: Theoretical...
  • Sueyoshi, T., y Goto, M., 2017, Methodological comparison among radial, non–radial and intermediate approaches for DEA environmental assessment....
  • Tyteca, D., 1996, On the Measurement of the Environmental Performance of Firms— A Literature Review and a Productive Efficiency Perspective....
  • Tyteca, D., 1997, Linear programming models for the measurement of environmental performance of firms—concepts and empirical results. Journal...
  • Yang, H., y Pollitt, M., 2009, Incorporating both undesirable outputs and uncontrollable variables into DEA: The performance of Chinese coal-fired...
  • Yang, H., y Pollitt, M. 2010, The necessity of distinguishing weak and strong disposability among undesirable outputs in DEA: Environmental...
  • Zaim, O., 2004, Measuring environmental performance of state manufacturing through changes in pollution intensities: a DEA framework. Ecological...
  • Zaim, O., y Taskin, F., 2000, Environmental efficiency in carbon dioxide emissions in the OECD: A non–parametric approach. Journal of Environmental...
  • Zofío, J. L., y Prieto, A. M., 2001, Environmental efficiency and regulatory standards: The case of CO2 emissions from OECD industries. Resource...