Acceso usuarios
Lusitania Villablanca Cerda
En este texto se analiza la Ley Nº 21.000, que creó la Comisión para el Mercado Financiero respecto uno de sus dos principales objetivos: modernizar el procedimiento sancionatorio. Más precisamente, este examen concierne la garantía de imparcialidad del juzgador. Nuestra hipótesis plantea que las medidas emprendidas por la ley satisfacen en buena medida la ambición manifestada por el legislador respecto de la garantía aludida, lo que no obsta a la subsistencia de interrogantes, críticas y subsecuentes mejoras. Para ello confrontaremos el régimen de la Ley Nº 21.000 con el régimen existente en forma previa a la reforma y con los requerimientos han formulado respecto de esa garantía, la doctrina regulatoria, y el derecho comparado.
This text analyses Law Nº 21.000 that created the Commission for the Financial Market, regarding one of its two main objectives: modernizing the sanctions proceedings. More precisely, this examination concerns the court´s guarantee of impartiality. Taking in account the numerous critics formulated against the former system, it was argued that the minimal procedural guarantees were not met. Our hypothesis suggests that the measures initiated by this law satisfies to a good extent the ambition expressed by the legislator regarding the alluded guarantee. This does not preclude the existence of yet to be answered questions, criticism and subsequent improvements. Therefore, we will compare it with the previously existing system and with the requirements that were formulated concerning the same guarantee by the regulatory doctrine and comparative law.
