Acceso usuarios
Paolo Sordi
The essay aims to argue that the Constitutional Court’s intervention has created a proper gap in art. 3, c. 1, d.lgs. 23/2015, which needs to be filled, in compliance with the general principle expressed by art. 12 disp. prel. c.c., by analogous application of norms that regulate similar cases that the Author identifies in art. 18, c. 5, l. 300/1970. This, despite the fact that the indi-cations that can derives from the arguments of Judgment 194/2018 are not sufficiently univo-cal to draw sure conclusions as to the criteria of quantification of the indemnity owed to the workers dismissed without just cause or justified reason.
