Usando el contexto común de los interlocutores para permitir redes de comunicación no intrusivas

• Fernando Olivera Domingo ^[1] ; Alfredo Rivas Cataneo ^[1] ; Felipe Iturriaga Cortés ^[1] ; Oscar Fabricio Valdez Castillo ^[1]
  1. [1] Instituto Politécnico Nacional

     Instituto Politécnico Nacional

     México

     
• Localización: RISTI: Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação, ISSN-e 1646-9895, Nº. Extra 1, 2014, págs. 77-90
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.4304/risti.e1.77-89
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Using common context of conversational partners in order to build non-intrusive communication networks
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen
  • español

    Los seres humanos poseen formas muy complejas y variadas de comunicarse e interactuar los unos con los otros. Las Tecnologías de la Información y la Comunicación actualmente solo adaptan las formas más directas de relacionarse, ignorando otras más sutiles. Es por ello que la mayoría de dichas tecnologías resultan altamente intrusivas. Sin embargo, en la comunicación frente a frente existen mecanismos que no demandan tanta atención, pero que apenas están presentes en las tecnologías actuales. Usando el contexto común entre los interlocutores (entendido como el conocimiento que tienen el uno del otro), se presenta una propuesta tecnológica de comunicación no intrusiva. Dicha propuesta se desarrolla para la comunicación entre dos personas con una prueba de concepto y un breve estudio de usuario. Se incluye también una propuesta para escalar dicha comunicación para su uso en pequeñas redes sociales (familias) sin que por ello crezcan desproporcionadamente las posibilidades de intrusión.

  • English

    Human beings have complex and varied ways to communicate and interact with each other. The Information and Communication Technologies currently are only suited for the most direct ways of interaction, ignoring the more subtle ones. That is why most of these technologies are highly intrusive. However in face-to-face communication, mechanisms exist that do not demand much attention, but they are barely present in current technologies. Using common context between conversational partners (as the knowledge they have of each other), a technological proposal for a non-intrusive communication is presented. This proposal is developed for communication between two people with a proof of concept and a brief user study. It also includes a proposal to scale such communication for its use in small social networks (as families), without necessarily growing intrusion possibilities disproportionately.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Brave, S., & Dahley, A. (1997). inTouch: a medium for haptic interpersonal communication. In CHI'97 extended abstracts on human factors...
  • Chang, A., Resner, B., Koerner, B., & Ishii, H. (2001). LumiTouch: an emotional communication device. In Conference on Human Factors in...
  • Consolvo, S., Roessler, P., Shelton, B., LaMarca, A., Schilit, B., Bly, S., . . .Seattle, W. (2004). Technology for care networks of elders....
  • García-Herranz, M., Olivera, F., Haya, P., & Alamán, X. (2012). Harnessing the interaction continuum for subtle assisted living. Sensors,...
  • Gellersen, H., Beigl, M., & Krull, H. (1999). The MediaCup: Awareness technology embedded in an everyday object. In Handheld and Ubiquitous...
  • Hausen, D. (2012). Peripheral interaction: facilitating interaction with secondary tasks. In Proceedings of the sixth International Conference...
  • Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. (1997). Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI...
  • Kortuem, G., Kawsar, F., Fitton, D., & Sundramoorthy, V. (2010). Smart objects as building blocks for the internet of things. Internet...
  • Mankoff , J., Dey, A. K., Hsieh, G., Kientz, J., Lederer, S., & Ames, M. (2003). Heuristic evaluation of ambient displays. In Proceedings...
  • Molyneaux, D., & Gellersen, H. (2009). Projected interfaces: enabling serendipitous interaction with smart tangible objects. In Proceedings...
  • Morris, M., Lundell, J., Dishman, E., & Needham, B. (2003). New perspectives on ubiquitous computing from ethnographic study of elders...
  • Mynatt, E., Rowan, J., Craighill, S., & Jacobs, A. (2001). Digital family portraits: supporting peace of mind for extended family members....
  • Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology development 101: A guide to creating your first ontology. Stanford Knowledge Systems...
  • Olivera, F., García-Herranz, M., Haya, P., & Llinás, P. (2011). Do not disturb: Physical interfaces for parallel peripheral interactions....
  • Olivera, F., Rivas, A., & Iturriaga, F. (2013). Subtle Interaction for a Non Intrusive Communication. In Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient...
  • Petersen, M. G., Hansen, A. B., Nielsen, K. R., & Gude, R. (2008). Homeintouch designing two-way ambient communication. In Ambient Intelligence...
  • Romero, N., Markopoulos, P., Baren, J., Ruyter, B., Ijsselsteijn, W., & Farshchian, B. (2007). Connecting the family with awareness systems....
  • Schilit, B. N., Hilbert, D. M., & Trevor, J. (2002). Context-aware communication. Wireless Communications, IEEE, 9 (5), 46—54.
  • Shannon, C. E. (2001). A mathematical theory of communication. ACM SIG-MOBILE Mobile Computing and Communications Review, 5 (1), 3—55.
  • Tollmar, K., & Persson, J. (2002). Understanding remote presence. In Proceedings of the second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction...
  • Weiser, M., & Brown, J. (1996). Designing calm technology. PowerGrid Journal, 1 (1), 75—85.
  • Zigelbaum, J., Chang, A., Gouldstone, J., Monzen, J., & Ishii, H. (2008). Speakcup: simplicity, BABL, and shape change. In Proceedings...