A New Player for Tackling Inequalities? Framing the Social Value and Impact of the Maker Movement

• Unterfrauner, Elisabeth ^[1] ; Hofer, Margit ^[1] ; Pelka, Bastian ^[2] ; Zirngiebl, Marthe ^[2]
  1. [1] Centre for Social Innovation

     Centre for Social Innovation

     Innere Stadt, Austria

     
  2. [2] Technical University of Dortmund

     Technical University of Dortmund

     Kreisfreie Stadt Dortmund, Alemania

     
• Localización: Social Inclusion, ISSN-e 2183-2803, Vol. 8, Nº. 2, 2, 2020 (Ejemplar dedicado a: Digital Inclusion Across the Globe: What Is Being Done to Tackle Digital Inequities?), págs. 190-200
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.17645/si.v8i2.2590
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • The Maker Movement has raised great expectations towards its potential for tackling social inequalities by mediating technology-related skills to everybody. Are maker spaces new players for social inclusion in digital societies? How can this potential impact be framed? While scientific discourse has so far identified broad value and impact dimensions of the Maker Movement, this article adds empirical insight into the potential for tackling social inequalities. The study is based on 39 interviews with makers and managers of maker initiatives and ten self-reporting surveys filled in by maker initiative managers throughout Europe, which have been analyzed qualitatively. We found four main domains in which makers address social inclusion: First, by mediating skills and competences not only in the field of digital technologies but in the broader sense of empowering people to “make” solutions for encountered problems. Second, we found that makers actively strive to provide democratized access to digital fabrication and the knowledge on how to use them. Third and fourth, we found different ambitions articulated by makers to change society and social practices towards a society providing better opportunities for individuals. As an entry point for further research and actions, we derived a maker typology that reflects the diverse and various types of relationships to be found in the maker community. This typology could be used for exploring further collaborations between social actors and the Maker Movement. We conclude with an outlook on potential trajectories of the Maker Movement and specify which could influence the inclusion of marginalized persons.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Awori, J., & Lee, J. M. (2017). A Maker Movement for health: A new paradigm for health innovation. JAMA Pediatrics, 171(2), 107–108.
  • Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (Eds.). (2009). Interviewing experts: Methodology and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bosse, I., Krüger, D., Linke, H., & Pelka, B. (2019). The Maker Movement’s potential for an inclusive society. In J. Howaldt, C. Kaletka,...
  • Boyatzis, R. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Bria, F., Gascó, M., Baeck, P., Halpin, H., Almirall, E., & Kresin, F. (2015). Growing a digital social innovation ecosystem for Europe...
  • Buehler, E., Hurst, A., & Hofmann, M. (2014). Comingto grips: 3D printing for accessibility. In ASSETS ’14:Proceedings of the 16th international...
  • Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. London: SAGE.
  • Devendorf, L., & Rosner, D. K. (2015). Reimagining digitalfabrication as performance art. In CHI EA ’15: Proceedings of the 33rd annual...
  • Dougherty, D. (2016). Free to make: How the Maker Movement is changing our schools, our jobs, and our minds. Berkeley, CA: North Atlantic...
  • Drever, E. (2003). Using semi-structured interviews in small-scale research: A teacher’s guide. Glasgow: Scottish Council for Research in...
  • Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research. London: SAGE.
  • Franz, H.-W., Hochgerner, J., & Howaldt, J. (2012). Challenge social innovation: An introduction. In H.-W. Franz, J. Hochgerner, &...
  • Grimm, R., Fox, C., Baines, S., & Albertson, K. (2013). Social innovation, an answer to contemporary societal challenges? Locating the...
  • Hochgerner, J. (2013). Social innovation. In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship...
  • Hwang, J.-P. (2017). Maker Movement influence on students’ learning motivation and learning achievement: A learning style perspective. In...
  • Kohtala, C. (2015). Addressing sustainability in research on distributed production: An integrated literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production,...
  • Kohtala, C., & Hyysalo, S. (2015). Anticipated environmental sustainability of personal fabrication. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99,...
  • Korhonen, I., Parkka, J., & van Gils, M. (2003). Health monitoring in the home of the future. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology...
  • Kronauer, M. (1996). “Soziale Ausgrenzung” und “Underclass”: Über neue Formen der gesellschaftlichen Spaltung [“Social exclusion” and “underclass”:...
  • Langley, D. J., Zirngiebl, M., Sbeih, J., & Devoldere, B. (2017). Trajectories to reconcile sharing and commercialization in the Maker...
  • Mayring, P. (2010). Einführung in die qualitative Sozialforschung: Eine Anleitung zu qualitativem Denken [Introduction to qualitative social...
  • Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: SAGE.
  • Millard, J., Sorivelle, M. N., Birkeholm Munk, K., Deljanin, S. R., Langley, D., van den Broek, T., . . . Zirngiebl, M. (2016). D2.1. Conceptual...
  • Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation: Ways to design. develop and grow social innovation....
  • Nascimento, S. (2014). Critical notions of technology and the promises of empowerment in shared machine shops. Journal of Peer Production,...
  • Nascimento, S., & Pólvora, A. (2018). Maker cultures and the prospects for technological action. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(3),...
  • Papavlasopoulou, S., Giannakos, M., & Jaccheri, M. L. (2016). Empirical studies on the Maker Movement, a promising approach to learning:...
  • Papert, S. (1994). The children’s machine: Rethinking school in the age of the computer. New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). The big idea: Creating shared value. How to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation...
  • Salmon, P. M., Stanton, N. A., & Jenkins, D. P. (2017). Distributed situation awareness: Theory, measurement and application to teamwork....
  • Sestini, F. (2012). Collective awareness platforms: Engines for sustainability and ethics. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 31, 54–62.
  • Silver, H. (2007). Social exclusion: Comparative analysis of Europe and Middle East youth (Middle East Youth Initiative Working Paper No....
  • Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American journal of evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.
  • Unterfrauner, E., & Voigt, C. (2017). Makers’ ambitions to do socially valuable things. The Design Journal. An International Journal for...
  • Unterfrauner, E., Voigt, C., Schrammel, M., & Menichinelli, M. (2017). The Maker Movement and the disruption of the producer-consumer...
  • Voigt, C., Unterfrauner, E., Aslan, T., & Hofer, M. (2019). Design Thinking with Children: The role of empathy, creativity and self-efficacy....
  • World Bank. (n.d.). Social inclusion. The World Bank. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/ social-inclusion
  • Yu, L. (2006). Understanding information inequality: Making sense of the literature of the information and digital divides. Journal of Librarianship...