Un análisis del comportamiento de la sociedad española con respecto a la protección de la privacidad en internet

• José Luis Gómez Barroso ^[1] ; Claudio Feijóo ^{[2] [3]}
  1. [1] Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

     Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

     Madrid, España

     
  2. [2] Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

     Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

     Madrid, España

     
  3. [3] Tongji University

     Tongji University

     China

     

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: RES. Revista Española de Sociología, ISSN 1578-2824, ISSN-e 2445-0367, Vol. 29, Nº. 2, 2020, págs. 213-232
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.22325/fes/res.2020.12
• Títulos paralelos:
  • An analysis of the behaviour of Spanish society regarding online privacy protection
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen
  • español

    La privacidad es un fenómeno social cuya descripción no ha recibido la atención que merece dada la creciente revelación y uso de información personal en relaciones privadas y públicas. A partir de una encuesta completada por 1650 individuos, este artículo investiga las variables que definen a quienes muestran una mayor preocupación por la privacidad en internet y a aquellos que siguen unos hábitos que permiten un mejor control de los datos que ceden. Tener antecedentes de problemas con la seguridad o de irritación por la invasión de la esfera privada es en ambos casos la variable más significativa. Está acompañada por otros factores relacionados con la actividad en internet y experiencia en su uso; las variables socioeconómicas o demográficas juegan un papel secundario.

  • English

    Privacy is a social phenomenon whose description has not get the attention it deserves, if considering the ever-growing disclosure and use of personal in- formation in private and public relations. Drew on an online survey of 1,650 Spanish adults, this ar- ticle asks which variables matter most in explain- ing privacy concerns and protecting-of-privacy behaviour. Previous negative experiences —either with security breaches or with being annoyed at the invasion of privacy— is the most significant variable in both cases. Other significant variables are related to online activity and expertise; demographic and socio-economic features only play a subordinate role.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Abbas, R., Mesch, G.S. (2015). Cultural values and Facebook use among Palestinian youth in Israel. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 644-653.
  • Acquisti, A., Taylor, C., Wagman, L. (2016). The economics of privacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 54(2), 442-492.
  • Allmer, T. (2011). A critical contribution to theoretical foundations of privacy studies. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics...
  • Altman, I. (1975). The Environment and Social Behaviour: Privacy, Personal Space, Territory, Crowding. Monterey: Brooks/Cole.
  • Baek, Y.M., Kim, E.M. (2014). My privacy is okay, but theirs is endangered: why comparative optimism matters in online privacy concerns. Computers...
  • Barth, S., de Jong, M.D.T., (2017). The privacy paradox – investigating discrepancies between expressed privacy concerns and actual online...
  • Bartsch, M., Dienlin, T. (2016). Control your Facebook: An analysis of online privacy literacy. Computers in Human Behavior, 56, 147-154.
  • Brandtzæg, P.B., Lüders, M., Skjetne, J.H. (2010). Too many Facebook ‘friends’? Content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy...
  • Burgoon, J.K. (1982). Privacy and communication. En M. Burgoon (ed.), Communication Yearbook 6 (pp. 206-249). Nueva York / Oxon: Routledge.
  • Chóliz, M. (2012). Mobile-phone addiction in adolescence: The test of mobile phone dependence. Progress in Health Sciences, 2(1), 33-44.
  • Christofides, E., Muise, A., Desmarais, S. (2009). Information disclosure and control on Facebook: Are they two sides of the same coin or...
  • DeCew, J.W. (1997). In Pursuit of Privacy: Law, Ethics, and the Rise of Technology. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  • Gerber, N., Gerber, P., Volkamer, M. (2018). Explaining the privacy paradox: A systematic review of literature investigating privacy attitude...
  • Gómez Barroso, J.L. (2018a). Uso y valor de la información personal: Un escenario en evolución. El Profesional de la Información, 27(1), 5-18.
  • Gómez Barroso, J.L. (2018b). Experiments on personal information disclosure: past and future avenues. Telematics and Informatics, 35(5), 1473-1490
  • Gómez Barroso, J.L., Feijóo, C. (2013). Información personal: la nueva moneda de la economía digital. El Profesional de la Información, 22(4),...
  • Gormley, K. (1992). One hundred years of privacy. Wisconsin Law Review, 1992(5), 1335-441.
  • Hull, G. (2015). Successful failure: what Foucault can teach us about privacy self-management in a world of Facebook and big data. Ethics...
  • Kang, J. (1998). Information privacy in cyberspace transactions, Stanford Law Review, 50(4), 1193-1294.
  • Kasper, D.V.S. (2005). The evolution (or devolution) of privacy, Sociological Forum, 20(1), 69-92.
  • Lankton, N.K., Harrison Mcknight, D., Tripp. J.F. (2017). “Facebook privacy management strategies: A cluster analysis of user privacy behaviors”....
  • Li, Y. (2012). Theories in online information privacy research: A critical review and an integrated framework. Decision Support Systems, 54(1),...
  • Li, K., Lin, Z., Wang, X. (2015). An empirical analysis of users’ privacy disclosure behaviors on social network sites. Information &...
  • Lorenzen-Huber, L., Boutain, M., Camp, L.J., Shankar, K., Connelly, K.H. (2011). Privacy, technology, and aging: A proposed framework, Ageing...
  • Margulis, S.T. (2003). Privacy as a social issue and behavioral concept. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 243-261.
  • Mathiyalakan, S., Taylor, G., Heilman, G.E., White, S.D., Brusa, J.O., Camacho Guitiérrez, P. (2014). Online privacy concerns: Gender differences...
  • Michelfelder, D.P. (2010). Philosophy, privacy, and pervasive computing. AI & Society, 25(1), 61-70.
  • Moore, B. (1998). Privacy. Society, 35(2), 287-299.
  • Moore, B. (1984). Privacy: Studies in Social and Cultural History. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.
  • Nissenbaum, H. (2010). Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
  • Park, Y.J. (2013). Digital literacy and privacy behavior online. Communication Research, 40, 215–236.
  • Peekhaus, W. (2007). Privacy for sale – Business as usual in the 21st century: An economic and normative critique. Journal of Information...
  • Regan, P.M. (2002). Privacy as a common good. Information, Communication and Society, 5(3), 382-405.
  • Reiman, J.H. (1976). Privacy, intimacy and personhood. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6(1), 26-44.
  • Roessler, B., Mokrosinska, D. (2013). Privacy and social interaction. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 39(8), 771–791.
  • Schoeman, F. (1984). Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Solove, D. (2002), Conceptualizing privacy, California Law Review, 90(4), 1087-1155.
  • Steeves, V. (2009), Reclaiming the social value of privacy. En I. Kerr, V. Steeves, C. Lucock (eds.), Lessons from the Identity Trail: Anonymity,...
  • Steinberger, P.J. (1999). Public and private. Political Studies, 47(2), 292-313.
  • Steijn, W.M.P., Schouten, A.P. (2013). Information sharing and relationships on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social...
  • Suárez Gonzalo, S. (2017). Big social data: límites del modelo notice and choice para la protección de la privacidad. El Profesional de la...
  • Thompson, J.B. (2000). Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Urista, M.A., Dong, Q., Day, K.D. (2009). Explaining why young adults use MySpace and Facebook through uses and gratifications theory. Human...
  • Van den Broeck, E., Poels, K., Walrave, M. (2015). Older and wiser? Facebook use, privacy concern, and privacy protection in the life stages...
  • Van Gool, E., Van Ouytsel, J., Ponnet, K., Walrave, M. (2015). To share or not to share? Adolescents’ self-disclosure about peer relationships...
  • Warren, S.D., Brandeis, L.D. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193-220.
  • Weintraub, J. (1997). The theory and politics of the public/private distinction En: J. Weintraub, K. Kumar (eds.), Public and Private in Thought...
  • Westin, A.F. (2003). Social and political dimensions of privacy. Journal of Social Issues, 59(2), 431-453.
  • Westin, A.F. (1967). Privacy and Freedom. Nueva York: Atheneum.
  • Young, K.S. (1998). Caught in the Net: How to recognize the signs of Internet addiction and a winning strategy for recovery. Nueva York: John...
  • Young, A.L., Quan-Haase, A. (2013). Privacy protection strategies on Facebook: The Internet privacy paradox revisited. Information, Communication...
  • Zuiderveen-Borgesius, F.J. (2013). Informed consent: We can do better to defend privacy. IEEE Security & Privacy, 13(2), 103-107.