Participación y perfil de los usuarios que comentan noticias de ciencia y salud online: estudio de caso

• Autores: Cristina González Pedraz, Ana Victoria Pérez Rodríguez
• Localización: Perspectivas de la comunicación, ISSN-e 0718-4867, Vol. 12, Nº. 1, 2019, págs. 101-115
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.4067/s0718-48672019000100101
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 2 Citas
• Referencias bibliográficas
  • BLANCHARD, A. (2011). Science Blogs in Research and Popularization of Science: Why, how and for whom?. En: Cockell, J. B., Darbellay, F.,...
  • BROSSARD, D. (2013). “New media landscapes and the science information consumer”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences - PNAS,...
  • CACCIATORE, M. A., ANDERSON, A. A., CHOI, D. H., BROSSARD, D., SCHEUFELE, D. A., LIANG, X., ... y DUDO, A. (2012). Coverage of emerging technologies:...
  • COLLINS, L., y NERLICH, B. (2015). “Examining User Comments for Deliberative Democracy: A Corpus-driven Analysis of the Climate Change Debate...
  • DÍAZ NOCI, J., y SALAVERRÍA, R. (2003). Manual de redacción ciberperiodística. Barcelona: Ariel.
  • DUNWOODY, S. (2014). Science journalism: prospects in the digital age. En: Bucchi, M., y Trench, B. (Eds.). Routledge Handbook of Public Communication...
  • FEINBERG, Y., PEREIRA, J.A., QUACH, S., KWONG, J.C., CROWCROFT, N.S., WILSON, S., GUAY, M., LEI, Y., y DEEKS, S.L. (2015). Understanding public...
  • GARDNER, B., SMITH, L., y MANSFIELD, L. (2017). How did the public respond to the 2015 expert consensus public health guidance statement on...
  • GILES, E.L., HOLMES, M., MCCOLL, E. S., FALKO F., y ADAMS, J.M. (2015). Acceptability of financial incentives for breastfeeding: thematic...
  • GRAF, J., ERBA, J., y HARN, R. W. (2017). The role of civility and anonymity on perceptions of online comments. Mass Communication and Society,...
  • HLAVACH, L., y FREIVOGEL, W. H. (2011). Ethical implications of anonymous comments posted to online news stories. Journal of Mass Media Ethics,...
  • HOLLIMAN, R., WHITELEGG, L., SCANLON, E., SMIDT, S., y THOMAS, J. (2009). Investigating science communication in the information age: Implications...
  • HOLLIMAN, R. (2010). From analogue to digital scholarship: implications for science communication researchers. JCOM, 9 (3). Disponible en:...
  • JANG, S. M. (2013). Seeking congruency or incongruency online? Examining selective exposure to four controversial science issues. Science...
  • JASPAL, R., NERLICH, B., y KOTEYKO, N. (2012). Contesting science by appealing to its norms: readers discuss climate science in The Daily...
  • KOTEYKO, N., JASPAL, R., y NERLICH, B. (2013). “Climate change and ‘climategate’in online reader comments: a mixed methods study”. The Geographical...
  • LASLO, E., BARAM-TSABARI, A., y LEWENSTEIN, B. (2011). A growth medium for the message: Online science journalism affordances for exploring...
  • LEI, Y., PEREIRA, J.A., QUACH, S., BETTINGER, J.A., KWONG, J.C., CORACE, K., GARBER, G., FEINBERG, Y., y GUAY, M. (2015). Examining Perceptions...
  • LEN-RÍOS, M. E., BHANDARI, M., y MEDVEDEVA, Y. S. (2014). Deliberation of the Scientific Evidence for Breastfeeding Online Comments as Social...
  • LOMBARD, M., SNYDER-DUCH, J., y BRACKEN, C. C. (2002). Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability....
  • MAURANEN, A. (2013). Hybridism, Edutainment, and doubt: Science blogging finding its feet. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 13(1), 7-36....
  • MINOL, K., SPELSBERG, G., SCHULTE, E., y MORRIS, N. (2007). Portals, blogs and co.: the role of the Internet as a medium of science communication....
  • NIELSEN, C. E. (2014). Coproduction or cohabitation: Are anonymous online comments on newspaper websites shaping news content?. New Media...
  • PEARCE, W., BROWN, B., NERLICH, B., y KOTEYKO, N. (2015). Communicating climate change: conduits, content, and consensus. Wiley Interdisciplinary...
  • PETERS, H. P., DUNWOODY, S., ALLGEIER, J., LO, Y. Y., y BROSSARD, D. (2014). “Public communication of science 2.0”. EMBO reports, 15(7). Disponible...
  • PICARDI, I., y REGINA, S. (2008). Sience via podcast. JCOM, 7 (2). Disponible en: http://ow.ly/7ELt30iOq2P (última consulta 07/03/2018)
  • READER, B. (2012). Free press vs. free speech? The rhetoric of “civility” in regard to anonymous online comments. Journalism & Mass Communication...
  • REVUELTA, G., y CORCHERO GARCÍA, C. (2010). Búsqueda activa y recepción pasiva de información sobre ciencia y tecnología. En: Percepción social...
  • SALAVERRÍA, R. (2016). Ciberperiodismo en Iberoamérica. Ariel y Fundación Telefónica. Disponible en: http://ow.ly/t5JV30jW0iv (última consulta...
  • SANZ-PÉREZ DE GUZMÁN, E. (2002). Ciencia digit@ l: ciencia para todos en Internet. Mediatika: cuadernos de medios de comunicación, (8),...
  • SECKO, D. M., TLALKA, S., DUNLOP, M., KINGDON, A., y AMEND, E. (2011). The unfinished science story: Journalist–audience interactions from...
  • SHANAHAN, M. C. (2010). Changing the meaning of peer-to-peer? Exploring online comment spaces as sites of negotiated expertise. JCOM, 9 (1)....
  • TRENCH, B. (2007). How the Internet changed science journalism. Journalism, Science and Society: Science Communication Between News and Public...
  • TRENCH, B. (2012). “Scientists’ blogs: Glimpses behind the scenes”. En: Rödder, S., Franzen, M., y Weingart, P. The Sciences’ Media Connection–Public...
  • VELTRI, G. A. (2013). Microblogging and nanotweets: Nanotechnology on Twitter. Public Understanding of Science, 22(7), 832-849. Disponible...
  • ZHANG, Y., MACHIN, D., y SONG, T. (2015). Visual forms of address in social media discourse: the case of a science communication website....