Acceso usuarios
Nadia Virginia Copello
El derecho a la salud reproductiva tiene una relación directa con el derecho a la vida, encontrándose amparado por los tratados internacionales de derechos humanos. Es razonable que existan limitaciones a estos derechos, puesto que no son absolutos, pero estas restricciones deben ser razonables. En el caso que analizaremos, la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación adopta una posición intermedia respecto del derecho a la salud reproductiva. Para ello, partiendo de la finalidad de la ley 26.862, esto es: “garantizar el acceso integral a los procedimientos y técnicas médico-asistenciales de reproducción médicamente asistida”y, teniendo en cuenta los derechos en juego, resolvió en favor de la vigencia del derecho dentro de parámetros razonables.
The right to reproductive health is directly related to the right to life, being protected by international human rights treaties. It is reasonable that there are limitations to these rights, since they are not absolute, but these restrictions must be reasonable. In the case we will analyze, the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation adopts an intermediate position regarding the right to reproductive health. To do this, based on the purpose of Law 26.862, this is: “guaranteeing comprehensive access to medico-assistance procedures and techniques of medically assisted reproduction” and, taking into account the rights at stake, resolved in favor of the validity of the right within reasonable parameters.
The right to reproductive health is directly related to the right to life, being protected by international human rights treaties. It is reasonable that there are limitations to these rights, since they are not absolute, but these restrictions must be reasonable. In the case we will analyze, the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation adopts an intermediate posi-tion regarding the right to reproductive health. To do this, based on the purpose of Law 26.862, this is: “guaranteeing comprehensive access to medico-assistance procedures and techniques of medically assisted reproduction” and, taking into account the rights at stake, resolved in favor of the validity of the right within reasonable parameters.
