Acceso usuarios
Valeria de las Mercedes Sola
En el siguiente artículo se analiza la causa “O.P.E. y otra c/ Buenos Aires, Provincia de y otros s/ daños y prejudicios”, en la cual el día 11 de diciembre de 2018, la Corte Suprema de la Justicia de la Nación, si bien se declaró incompetente para entender en el caso en instancia originaria, hizo lugar –por mayoría de votos– a la medida cautelar innovativa consistente en la provisión de una silla de ruedas motorizada. Dicha medida fue solicitada en el marco de un reclamo de indemnización por daños y perjuicios derivados de una supuesta mala praxis donde se encontraba involucrada una persona con discapacidad. The following article analyzes the cause “O.P.E. and another c / Buenos Aires, Province of and other s / damages and prejudices ”, in which on December 11, 2018 the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, although it declared itself incompetent to understand in the case in instance originally, it took place - by majority vote - to the innovative precautionary measure consisting of the provision of a motorized wheelchair. This measure was requested in the context of a claim for compensation for damages arising from an alleged malpractice where a person with disabilities was involved.
The following article analyzes the cause “O.P.E. and another c / Buenos Aires, Province of and other s / damages and prejudices ”, in which on December 11, 2018 the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, although it declared itself incompetent to understand in the case in instance originally, it took place - by majority vote - to the innovative pre-cautionary measure consisting of the provision of a motorized wheelchair. This measure was requested in the context of a claim for compensation for damages arising from an alleged malpractice where a person with disabilities was involved.
