Paying court to the future: has the time for an ASEAN trade tribunal arrived?

• Tatham, Allan F. ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad CEU San Pablo

     Universidad CEU San Pablo

     Madrid, España

     
• Localización: Estudios de Deusto: revista de Derecho Público, ISSN 0423-4847, Vol. 67, Nº. 2, 2019, págs. 47-64
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.18543/ed-67(2)-2019pp47-64
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Paying Court to the Future: ha llegado el tiempo para un Tribunal de comercio de la ASEAN?
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen
  • español

    Con el clima global para el comercio multilateral experimentando una marcada desaceleración y el mecanismo de solución de controversias (MSC) de la Organización Mundial del Comercio bajo una fuerte tensión, la atención ha comenzado a centrarse en la priorización de las estructuras comerciales regionales. Si bien los MSC de la ASEAN han seguido tradicionalmente un camino consensuado hacia la resolución, este documento analiza las oportunidades actuales para establecer un Tribunal de Comercio de la ASEAN (TCA) permanente. Tal entidad necesitaría encajar dentro de los límites de un paso cauteloso en el desarrollo gradual del sistema de comercio de la ASEAN basado en normas, ampliando las oportunidades para utilizar el arbitraje en controversias y para proporcionar un procedimiento para garantizar una interpretación coherente de la legislación comercial de la ASEAN.Recibido: 22.10.2019 Aceptado: 21.11.2019 Publicación en línea: 31.12.2019

  • English

    With the global climate for multilateral trade experiencing a marked slowdown and the dispute settlement mechanism (DSM) of the World Trade Organization under severe strain, attention has started to turn to the prioritizing of regional trade structures. Although ASEAN DSMs have traditionally pursued a consensual path towards resolution, this paper discusses the current opportunities for establishing a permanent ASEAN Trade Tribunal (ATT). Such an entity would need to fit within the boundaries of a cautious step in the gradual development of the rules-based ASEAN trading system, by extending the opportunities for using arbitration in disputes and for providing a procedure to ensure a coherent interpretation of ASEAN trade law.Received: 22.10.2019Accepted: 21.11.2019Published online: 31.12.2019

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • beckman, Robert et al., Promoting Compliance: The Role of Dispute Settlement and Monitoring Mechanisms in ASEAN Instruments. Cambridge: Cambridge...
  • bühler, Michael W. «Out of Africa: The 2018 OHADA Arbitration and Mediation Law Reform». Journal of International Arbitration 35, n.o 5 (2018):...
  • desIerto, Diane A. «ASEAN’s Constitutionalization of International Law: Challenges for Evolution Under the New ASEAN Charter». Columbia Journal...
  • de Waele, Henri. «Not Quite the Bed that Procrustes Built? Dissecting the System for Selecting Judges at the Court of Justice of the European...
  • dunoff, Jeffrey L., y Mark A. Pollack. «The Judicial Trilemma». American Journal of International Law 111, n.o 2 (2017): 225-276.
  • duy phan, Hao. «A Blueprint For a Southeast Asian Court Of Human Rights». Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal 10, n.o 2 (2009): 384-433.
  • eWIng-choW, Michael. «Culture Club or Chameleon: Should ASEAN Adopt Legalization for Economic Integration?». Singapore Year Book of International...
  • folsom, Ralph H. «ASEAN as a Regional Economic Group – A Comparative Lawyer’s Perspective». Malaya Law Review 25 (1983): 203-224.
  • gao, Henry. «Dispute Settlement Provisions in ASEAN’s External Economic Agreements with China, Japan and Korea». En ASEAN Law in the New Regional...
  • henry, Laurence. «The ASEAN Way and Community Integration: Two Different Models of Regionalism». European Law Journal 13 (2007): 857-879.
  • kaplan, Jeffrey A. «ASEAN’s Rubicon: A Dispute Settlement Mechanism for AFTA». UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal 14 (1996):147-195.
  • katsumata, Hiro. «Reconstruction of Diplomatic Norms in Southeast Asia: The Case for Strict Adherence to the ‘ASEAN Way’». Contemporary Southeast...
  • kosař, David. «Selecting Strasbourg Judges: A Critique». En Selecting Europe’s Judges: A Critical Review of the Appointment Procedures to...
  • meIsenberg, Simon M., e Ignaz Stegmiller, eds., The Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia – Assessing their Contribution to International...
  • naldI, Gino J. «The ASEAN Protocol on Dispute Settlement Mechanisms: An Appraisal». Journal of International Dispute Settlement 5, n.o 1 (2014):...
  • nIschalke, Tobias I. «Insights from ASEAN’s Foreign Policy Co-operation: The ‘ASEAN Way’, a Real Spirit or a Phantom?». Contemporary Southeast...
  • rooney, Kim M. «Overview of the 2009 ASEAN Comprehensive Investment Agreement». Dispute Resolution International 4, n.o 2 (2010): 169-189.
  • seah, Daniel. «The ASEAN Charter». International and Comparative Law Quarterly 58 (2009): 197-212.
  • tay, Simon S.C. «The ASEAN Charter: Between National Sovereignty and the Region’s Constitutional Moment». Singapore Year Book of International...
  • trIdImas, Takis. «The European Court of Justice and the Draft Constitution: A Supreme Court for the Union?». En EU Law for the Twenty-First...
  • VIllalta puIg, Gonzalo, y lee tsun Tat. «Problems with the ASEAN Free Trade Area Dispute Settlement Mechanism and Solutions for the ASEAN...