A problem with empirical studies of party policy shifts: Alternative measures of party shifts are uncorrelated

• James Adams ^[4] ; Bernardi, Luca ^[1] ; Ezrow, Lawrence ^[2] ; Gordon, Oakley B. ^[4] ; Liu, Tzu‐Ping ^[4] ; Phillips, M. Christine ^[3]
  1. [1] Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

     Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona

     Barcelona, España

     
  2. [2] University of Essex

     University of Essex

     Colchester District, Reino Unido

     
  3. [3] Texas A&M University

     Texas A&M University

     Estados Unidos

     
  4. [4] University of California Davis USA

  Mostrar afiliaciones +
• Localización: European journal of political research, ISSN 0304-4130, ISSN-e 1475-6765, Vol. 58, Nº. 4, 2019, págs. 1234-1244
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12324
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • Many recent cross‐national studies analyse the causes and electoral consequences of party policy shifts, using party position measures derived from election manifestos, expert surveys or voter surveys. However few studies validate their findings by analysing multiple measures of party policy shifts. In this article, data on European parties’ position shifts on both European integration and left‐right ideology is analysed, showing that this is problematic because, while alternative measures of party policy positions correlate strongly in cross‐sectional analyses, alternative measures of parties’ policy shifts are essentially uncorrelated in longitudinal analyses. Suggestions are offered on how to address this problem.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • 10.1017/S0007123418000029
  • Volkens, A.,Lehmann, P., Matthieß, T., Merz, N., Regel, S.& Weßels, B.(2018).The Manifesto Data Collection.Version 2018a. Berlin: Manifesto...
  • 10.1017/S0022381608090130
  • 10.1177/1354068812462931
  • 10.4324/9780203028179
  • 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00383.x
  • Bernardi L. Sabaté O. Visconti F.&Morales L.(2018).Governing Status and Intra‐party Disagreement in Europe. Paper presented at the ResponsiveGov...
  • Bischof D.(2018).How Do Parties React to Protest? The Moderating Effects of Party Ideology and Public Opinion. Unpublished manuscript. Available...
  • Comparative Study of Electoral Systems(2018).CSES module 4 full release[dataset and documentation]. 29 May version. Available online at:www.cses.org
  • Dalton R.J.(2015).Stability and Change in Party Issue Positions across the 2009 and 2014 European Elections. Unpublished manuscript.
  • 10.1177/0010414014558257
  • 10.1017/gov.2014.15
  • 10.1002/9781118625590
  • Giebler H. Lichteblau J. May A. Melcher R. Wagner A.&Weßels B.(2016).CSES module 1–3 harmonized trend file. 31 May version. Available...
  • 10.1080/01402382.2014.981448
  • 10.1177/0010414006297169
  • 10.1016/j.electstud.2006.03.009
  • 10.1017/psrm.2015.56
  • Somer‐Topcu Z.&Tavits M.(2018).Does Message Distortion by Rivals Affect Party Policy Images?Unpublished manuscript.
  • 10.3998/mpub.3210669
  • 10.1016/j.electstud.2014.04.014
  • Tomz M.&Van Houweling R.(2014).Political Repositioning: A Conjoint Analysis. Unpublished manuscript.
  • Guilford, J.P. (1954).Psychometric methods, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Polk, J. et al. (2017). Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for politicalparties in Europe with the...
  • Schmitt, H. et al. (2009).European Election Study, 2004, 2nd edn. ZA4566 Data file version 2.0.0. Cologne: GESIS.
  • Van der Eijk, C.et al. (1999).European Election Study, 1999. Hamburg: IPSOS.
  • 10.1146/annurev-polisci-031710-101450