Identidades culturales a través de textos audiovisuales satíricos: El caso de "La Vida de Brian"

• Valhondo Crego, José Luís ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad de Extremadura

     Universidad de Extremadura

     Badajoz, España

     
• Localización: Cuadernos de documentación multimedia, ISSN-e 1575-9733, Nº. 30, 1, 2019, págs. 89-105
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.5209/CDMU.62809
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen

  • Life of Brian parodies a mythical narrative of Western culture in order to satirize cultural stereotypes after May 1968, at the time of transition to an economic model of global deregulation of markets. Monty Python work with detachment strategies to reenchant a depleted political sphere; however, with regard to the problem of multiculturalism, his account does not offer solutions for the diversity of the publics. Neither the old nor the new Institutions are represented by offering viable political horizons. Christianity, the Establishment or the New Left are described with scepticism at best or cynically, at worst. In short, only the posture of perplexity and astonishment of Brian serves as a common value in the construction of a public sphere whose main trait is a postmodern oxymoron, the individualistic gregariousness

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Althusser, L. (1988). Ideología y aparatos ideológicos del Estado. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.3917/amx.045.0128
  • Barker, C. (2003). Television, globalización e identidades culturales. Barcelona.
  • Bakhtin, M. (1990). La cultura popular en la Edad Media y en el Renacimiento: el contexto de François Rabelais. Alianza universidad ; 493....
  • Bordwell, D. (1985). Narration in the Fiction Film. University of Wisconsin Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/fq.1986.40.1.04a00150
  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). The Field of Cultural Production. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9781444331899.2011.00023.x
  • Brecht, B. (1992). The Modern Theatre is the Epic Theatre. In Brecht on Theatre The Development of an Aesthetic.
  • Field, S. (2006). The Screenwriter’s workbook. In The Screenwriter’s workbook.
  • Gamboni, D. (2005). Composing the body politic. In B. Latour & P. Weibel (Eds.), Making things public. Cambridge, Massachussets: The MIT...
  • Giddens, A. (2016). Modernity and self-identity. In Social Theory Re-Wired: New Connections to Classical and Contemporary Perspectives: Second...
  • Hall, S. (1996). The Question of Cultural ldentity. Modernity: An Introduction to Modern Societies. https://doi.org/grossbritannien;cultural...
  • Jefferies, S. (2017). The Frankfurt School: A Timeline.
  • Johnstone, K. (1979). Impro: Improvisation and the Theat. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203446294
  • McKee, R. (1997). Story: Substance, structure, style and the principles of screen writing. Regan Books, New York. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(05)80899-X
  • MacRidis, R. C. (1998). Las ideologías políticas contemporánas. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
  • Metz, C. (1982). The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema. The SAGE Handbook of Film Studies. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200400.n15
  • Pierre, A. J., & Said, E. (1993). Culture and Imperialism. Foreign Affairs. https://doi.org/10.2307/20045634
  • Seidman, S. (2013). Contested Knowledge: Social Theory Today. In Contested Knowl.
  • Valhondo, J. L. (2011). Monarchy, jesters, politicians and audiences comparison of TV satire in UK and Spain. Revista Latina de Comunicacion...
  • Vogler, C. (2002). El Viaje del escritor: Las estructuras míticas para escritores, guionistas, dramaturgos y novelistas. MA NON TRO. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2007.01.021