Mais pluralismo: considerações sobre a relevância do Movimento Por uma Economia Pós-Autista

• Autores: Daniel de Santana Vasconcelos, Maísa Goulart S. Ribeiro, Ramon García Fernandez
• Localización: Nova Economia, ISSN 0103-6351, Año 28, Nº. 3, 2018, págs. 715-743
• Idioma: portugués
• DOI: 10.1590/0103-6351/3589
• Títulos paralelos:
  • More Pluralism: considerations about the Post-Autistic Economics Movement relevance
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen
  • English

    Abstract The purpose of this paper is to analyze the proposal of the Post-Autistic Economics Movement (PAE), since its origins until our days, in the context of the current debate about the need of pluralism as a desirable standard for the evolution of economics, especially for the teaching of the discipline. The paper discusses the scientific character of economics, taking into account PAE’s criticism, looking at this movement’s history and recent developments, in the light of the criticism on economic thought raised after the effects of 2008 Financial Crisis. In particular, the paper focuses on the possible impacts of movements like this in the teaching of economics on this post-crisis environment, which demands greater pluralism and methodological freedom in economic thought and methodology.

  • português

    Resumo O objetivo deste trabalho é analisar a proposta do Movimento Por uma Economia Pós-Autista (MPEPA), a partir da situação atual na evolução do pensamento econômico e do debate que tem surgido sobre pluralismo como princípio desejável para a ciência econômica, especialmente no seu ensino. O trabalho discute o caráter científico da economia a partir de questionamentos levantados pelo MPEPA, bem como situa a história do movimento e seus recentes desenvolvimentos, no contexto das diversas críticas enfrentadas pela ciência econômica no período posterior à crise financeira iniciada em 2008. Avaliam-se os possíveis impactos de movimentos como o MPEPA para o ensino de economia, num ambiente que demanda maior pluralismo e liberdade metodológica nas abordagens dessa ciência.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • ANDRADE, R. P. (2011). A construção do conceito de incerteza: uma comparação das contribuições de Knight, Keynes, Shackle e Davidson. Nova...
  • BEED, C.,KANE, O. (1991). What Is the Critique of the Mathematization of Economics?. Kyklos. 44. 581-612
  • BIANCHI, A. M. (1992). Muitos métodos é o método: a respeito do pluralismo. Revista de Economia Política. 12. 135
  • BLAUG, M. (2007). A Companion to the History of Economic Thought. Blackwell. Malden (MA).
  • BORBA, E. O Pluralismo Enquanto Alternativa ao Monismo Metodológico na Economia.
  • CALDWELL, B. (1982). Beyond Positivism: Economic Methodology in the Twentieth Century. George Allen & Unwin. London.
  • CALDWELL, B. (1990). The Philosophy and Methodology of Economics. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham.
  • CALDWELL, B. (1997). Pluralism in Economics: new perspectives in history and methodology. EAEPE & Edward Elgar. Cheltenham.
  • CAVALIERI, M. A. R. (2008). Quanto evoluíram os evolucionários? Um ensaio pluralista sobre a maturidade de um programa de pesquisa em economia....
  • CAVALIERI, M. A. R. (2009). Sobre os porquês do pluralismo em economia: aproximações de uma alternativa historicista. Pesquisa & Debate....
  • CHICK, V. (1998). On knowing one’s place: the role of formalism in Economics. Economic Journal. 108. 1859
  • COLANDER, D. (2000). The death of Neoclassical economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought. 22. 127
  • COLANDER, D.,HOLT, R.,ROSSER, B. (2007). The Changing Face of Mainstream Economics. Review of Political Economy. 16. 485
  • COLANDER, D.,FÖLLMER, H.,HAAS, A.,GOLDBERG, M.,JUSELIUS, K.,KIRMAN, A.,LUX, T.,SLOTH, B. (2009). The Financial Crisis and the Systemic Failure...
  • (1991). Report of the Comission on Graduate Education in Economics. Journal of Economic Literature. 29. 1035
  • DANZINGER, S.,VAN DER HAAG, J.,SMOLENSKY, E.,TAUSSIG, M. K. The life cycle hypothesis and the consumption behavior of the elderly. Journal...
  • DAVIDSON, P. Is economics a Science? Should economics be rigorous?.
  • DAVIDSON, P. (1994). Post Keynesian macroeconomic theory: a foundation for successful economic policies for the twenty-first century. Edward...
  • DEQUECH, D. (2007). Neoclassical, Mainstream, Orthodox and Heterodox Economics. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics. 30. 279-302
  • DILTHEY, W.,Makkreel, R. A.,Rodi, F.,Neville, Michae. (1989). Introduction to the Human Sciences. Princeton University Press. New Jersey.
  • DOW, S. (2004). Reorienting Economics: Some Epistemological Issues. Journal of Economic Methodology. 11. 307
  • DOW, S. (2004). Structured Pluralism. Journal of Economic Methodology. 11.
  • DOW, S. Heterodox Economics: A Commom Challenge to Mainstream Economics?. Macroeconomics and Macroeconomic Policies: Alternatives to the...
  • DUPUY, J. P. (2014). Economy and the future: a crisis of faith. Michigan State University Press. East Lancing.
  • FAGGINI, M.,PARZIALE, A. (2012). The failure of economic theory: lessons from chaos theory. Modern Economy. 3. 1-10
  • FERNANDEZ, R.G. (2011). O Brasil e a ciência econômica em debate. Saraiva. São Paulo.
  • FERRARI FILHO, F.,ARAÚJO, J. . (2000). Caos, Incerteza e teoria pós-keynesiana.
  • FEYERABEND, P. (2011). Contra o método. Editora Unesp. São Paulo.
  • FITOUSSI, J.P. (2001). L'enseignement supérieur des sciences économiques en question. Rapport au ministre de l’Education nationale. Fayard....
  • FRIEDMAN, M. (1966). The methodology of positive economics. In: Essays on positive economics. Chicago University Press. 3-43
  • FULLBROK, E. (2003). The crisis in economics. Routledge. Kentucky.
  • FULLBROK, E. (2008). Pluralist Economics. Zed Books. London & New York.
  • GILLIES, D. (2004). A Guide to What’s Wrong with Economics. Routledge. London.
  • HAHN, F. (1984). Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Basic Blackwell. Oxford.
  • HALDANE, A. (2012). The Dog and the Frisbee. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City’s 36th Economic Policy Symposium - “The Changing Policy...
  • HAMILTON, James D. (1994). Time Series Analysis. Princeton University Press. Princeton (NJ).
  • INGRAO, B.,ISRAEL, G. (1990). The Invisible Hand: Economic Equilibrium in History of Science. MIT Press. Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • KALECKI, M. (1954). Collected Works of Michal Kalecki. Oxford University Press. Oxford.
  • KEYNES, J. M. (1921). A Treatise on Probability. Cosimo Classics. New York.
  • KEYNES, J. M.,Moggridge, Donal. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes....
  • KEYNES, J. N. (1917). The escope and Method of Political Economy. University Press. Nova York.
  • KNIGHT, F. H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Hart, Schaffner & Marx. Boston (MA).
  • KRUGMAN, P. (2009). How did economists get it so wrong?. The New York Times Magazine.
  • KUHN, T. S. (2003). A Estrutura das Revoluções Científicas. Perspectiva. São Paulo.
  • LACEY, H. (1999). Is science value free? Values and scientific understanding. Routledge. Londres.
  • LAWSON, T. (2003). Reorienting Economics. Routledge. Kentucky.
  • LEE, F. (2009). A History of Heterodox Economics: challenging the mainstream in the twentieth century. Routledge. London & New York.
  • LUCAS, R. E. (1981). Studies in business cycle theory. The MIT Press. Cambridge (MA).
  • LUCAS, R. E.,SARGENT, T. . (1981). Rational Expectations of Econometric Practices. University of Minesotta Press.
  • LUPERI, M. M. S. (2015). The general equilibrium theory as economic metatheory. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy. 30. 306
  • LUPERI, M. M. S. (2012). Três Ensaios Críticos Sobre o Processo de Matematização da Economia no Brasil e no Mundo. FGV/EESP.
  • LUPERI, M. M. S.,FERNANDEZ, R. G. Os impactos da crise na física e na matemática do início do século XX sobre o discurso econômico contemporâneo....
  • MÄKI, U. (1997). Pluralism in Economics: new perspectives in history and methodology. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham & Brookfield.
  • MANDELBROT, B. (1987). Towards a second stage of determinism in Science. Interdisciplinary Science Review. 12. 117
  • McCLOSKEY, D. N. (1994). Knowledge and persuasion in economics. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.
  • McCLOSKEY, D. N. (2001). Three Books of Oomph. Eastern Economic Journal. 27. 115
  • MIROWSKI, P. (1986). From Mandelbrot to chaos in economic theory. Southern Economic Journal. 57. 289-307
  • MIROWSKI, P. (1989). More Heat than Light: Economics as social physics, physics as nature’s economics. Cambridge University Press. New York....
  • MIROWSKI, P. (1991). The When, the How and the Why of Mathematical Expression in the History of Economic Analysis. Journal of Economic Perspectives....
  • MITCHELL, W.C. (1913). Business Cycles. University of California Press. Berkeley.
  • MOHN, K. (2010). Autism in Economics? A Second Opinion. Forum for Social Economics. 39. 191-208
  • NELSON, R. R. (2005). As fontes do crescimento econômico. Editora da Unicamp. Campinas.
  • PIKETTY, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Belknap Press/Harvard University Press. Cambridge (MA).
  • POSNER, R. A. (2009). How I Became a Keynesian: Second thoughts in the middle of a crisis. The New Republic.
  • POSNER, R. A. (2009). A failure of capitalism: the crisis of ’08 and the descent into depression. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.
  • POSNER, R. A. (2010). The Crisis of Capitalist Democracy. Harvard University Press. Cambridge.
  • RIZVI, S.T.A. (2007). A Companion to the History of Economic Thought. Blackwell. Malden (MA).
  • ROMER, P. (2016). The trouble with macroeconomics. The Commons Memorial Lecture of the Omicron Delta Epsilon Society/Stern School of Business....
  • SALANTI, A.,Salanti, A.,Screpanti, E. (1997). Pluralism in Economics: new perspectives in history and methodology. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham&...
  • SALANTI, A.,SCREPANTI, E. (1997). Pluralism in Economics: new perspectives in history and methodology. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham & Brookfield....
  • SAMUELS, W. (1993). In (Limited but Affirmative) Defence of Nihilism. Review of Political Economy. 5. 236
  • SAMUELS, W. (1997). Pluralism in Economics: new perspectives in history and methodology. Edward Elgar. Cheltenham& Brookfield.
  • SAMUELSON, P. (1969). Monetary theory. Penguin. London.
  • SAMUELSON, P. (1947). Foundations of economic analysis. Harvard University Press. Boston.
  • SCHUMPETER, J. A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Developmnet: an inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cicle....
  • SHACKLE, G. L. S. (1967). The years of high theory: invention & tradition in economic thought 1926-1939. Cambridge Univesity Press. Cambridge....
  • SMOLIN, L. (2007). The trouble with Physics: the rise of String Theory, the fall of a science, and what comes next. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt....
  • STIGLITZ, J. (2014). Reconstructing macroeconomic theory to manage economic policy. NBER.
  • TOSSATO, C. R. (2012). Incomensurabilidade, comparabilidade e objetividade. Sci. stud.. 10. 489-504
  • VON NEUMANN, J.,MORGENSTERN, O. (1953). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press. Princeton (NJ).
  • WEINTRAUB, E. R. (2002). How Economics Became a Mathematical Science. Duke University Press. Durham and London.
  • WOO, H. K. H. (1986). What's Wrong with Formalization in Economics - An Epistemological Critique. Victoria Press.