Pisa, Italia
La rehabilitación del pensamiento de Nicolás Maquiavelo que intentara Kaspar Schoppe en su Paideia politices, en donde afirmaba que este solo estaba repitiendo argumentos ya planteados por Aristóteles y Tomás de Aquino, nos permite reconocer la intrincada relación entre las diferentes lecturas que dieron lugar a la composición de esta defensa. Una adecuada contextualización de la misma, señalando la correcta distantica entre las perspectivas etic y emic quizás pueda permitirnos conocer mejor el significado del pensamiento maquiaveliano.
The rehabilitation of the Machiavelli thought that Kaspar Schopper tried in his Paideia policies where he affirmed that Machiavelli was just repeating arguments that Aristotle and Thomas Aquinas had already stated before, allows us to recognize the intricate relationship among the different readings that give rise to the composition of this defense. An appropriate contextualization of such different readings that pointed the right distance between etic and emic approaches, perhaps could allow us to know better the real meaning of Machiavellian thought.