Acceso usuarios
Sandra Bartelt
The article concerns the inter‐institutional relations and describes the dynamics between the main EC institutions in the decision‐making process regarding the adoption of the new external action instruments. In 2004, the Commission had proposed a set of new external action instruments as base for the delivery of the Community's external assistance. By that time, the existing instruments amounted to more than 30 different legal instruments, which implicated a loss of efficiency in the management of the EC's external assistance. After 2 years of inter‐institutional negotiations between the European Parliament, Council and the Commission, the new set of instruments was finally adopted. Compared to the initial Commission proposals, the design of the new instruments got significantly reshaped in the course of the inter‐institutional decision‐making procedure. In particular, the European Parliament had gained an unprecedented degree of power over the legislative framework for external spending. Compared to the former range of geographic and thematic regulations, the new external action instruments fundamentally reform the delivery of external financial assistance with their streamlined and simplified structure. They consist of three horizontal instruments to respond to particular needs or crisis situation: an Instrument for Stability, an Instrument for Nuclear Safety Co‐operation) and a European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights. With regard to geographic coverage, four instruments will implement particular policies: the Instrument for Pre‐accession Assistance, the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument and the Instrument for Development Co‐operation and an Instrument for Co‐operation with Industrialised Countries.
