Acceso usuarios
Irene Gasparini
SOMMARIO: 1. Introduzione. - 2. Odio 2.0: Vhate speech nell'era digitale. - 3. La regolamentazione europea dell'odio online: una tríplice strategia. - 4. Monitoring, reporting e contro-narrative. - 5. ISP e la rimozione dei contenuti d'odio. - 6. Online hate speech e regimi di responsabilitá nella normativa e giurisprudenza europea: l'autore del contenuto d'odio. - 7. (Segué) La responsabilitá dell'ISP nella normativa europea, alia luce delle pronunce della Corte di Giustizia. - 8. La responsabilitá per online hate speech nell'ordinamento italiano: quali indicazioni dall'Europa? - 9. Conclusión!.
ABSTRACT: The globalization of technology has brought about a vast spread of the deviant phenomenon of cyberhate and, namely, of bate speech committed online. The European institutions are addressing such a phenomenon by engaging on a triple strategy: (i) encouraging monitoring and self-regulation by IT providers, as well as the spreading of counter-narratives; (ii) obligating the ISP to remove bate contení from their platforms; and (iii) holding accountable tioth the author of online bate speech and the ISP. By examining the European policy documents, the normative tools and the jurisprudence, as well as its influences on the ltalian (criminal) system, the paper wishes to frame the state of the art and the changing trends of the European policy on cyber bate speech
