Uma análise preditiva para o uso do instrumento antidumping na Argentina

• Autores: Vinícius de Azevedo Couto Firme
• Localización: Nova Economia, ISSN 0103-6351, Año 28, Nº. 1, 2018, págs. 39-70
• Idioma: portugués
• DOI: 10.1590/0103-6351/3101
• Títulos paralelos:
  • A predictive analysis for the use of antidumping in Argentina
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen
  • English

    Abstract: This paper analyzed the influence of macroeconomic factors on the opening of antidumping cases (AD) in Argentina. The resulting model was used to predict the use of AD in this country. Quarterly data, from 1995 to 2010, were used to this end. The models were estimated by Ordinary Least Squares (OLS), Poisson and Negative Binominal. The results revealed that the lagged variables can cause greater impacts on the opening of AD cases than contemporary variables. In addition, a worsening in current account, a currency devaluation or an increase in GDP from Argentina, Brazil and the rest of the world could reduce AD cases. As for predictions, it was found that Poisson was the closest to the real average number of AD measures initiated by Argentina. However, the smaller residuals were produced by OLS estimation. In general, the predictive capability of these models reveals a misuse of AD from Argentina.

  • português

    Resumo: Este trabalho verificou o impacto de fatores macroeconômicos sobre a abertura de casos antidumping (AD) na Argentina e usou o modelo resultante para prever o uso do AD nesse país. Para tanto, considerou dados trimestrais de 1995 a 2010. Os modelos, estimados via Mínimos Quadrados Ordinários (MQO), Poisson e Binominal Negativo, revelaram que as variáveis defasadas causam maiores impactos sobre a abertura de casos AD que as variáveis contemporâneas. Além disso, uma piora nas transações correntes, uma desvalorização cambial ou um crescimento nas rendas da Argentina, do Brasil e do resto do mundo tenderiam a reduzir os casos AD. Quanto às previsões, verificou-se que o modelo de Poisson foi o que mais se aproximou do número real médio de medidas AD iniciadas pela Argentina. Contudo, o MQO produziu os menores resíduos. De modo geral, a boa capacidade preditiva de tais modelos revela um mau uso do AD por parte da Argentina.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • AGGARWAL, . (2004). Macroeconomic determinants of antidumping: a comparative analysis of developed and developing countries. World Development....
  • AHN, D.,SHIN, . (2011). Analysis of Anti-dumping Use in Free Trade Agreements. Journal of World Trade. 45. 431
  • (2015). ALICEweb.
  • AMITI, M.,FREUND, . (2008). The Anatomy of China's Export Growth. The World Bank - Development Research Group. Trade Team.
  • BATISTA JR., P. . (2002). Argentina: uma crise paradigmática. Estudos Avançados. 16.
  • BECKER, B.,THEURINGER, . (2001). Macroeconomic determinants of contingent protection: The case of the EU. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik...
  • BELLO, T. . (2002). Algumas considerações sobre a crise argentina. Indic. Econ. FEE. 30. 251
  • BLONIGEN, B.,PRUSA, . (2001). Antidumping. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • BOWN, C. . (2011). Taking Stock of Antidumping, Safeguards and Countervailing Duties, 1990-2009. The World Economy. 34. 1955
  • CAMERON, A. C.,TRIVEDI, P. . (1990). Regression-based Tests for Overdispersion in the Poisson Model. Journal of Econometrics. 46. 347
  • EVENETT, S. . (2006). The simple analytics of U.S. antidumping orders: Bureaucratic discretion, anti-importer bias, and the Byrd amendment....
  • FEINBERG, R. . (1989). Exchange rate and unfair trade. Review of Economics and Statistics. 71. 704
  • FEINBERG, . (2005). U.S. Antidumping Enforcement and Macroeconomic Indicators Revisited: Do Petitioners Learn?. Review of World Economics....
  • FEINBERG, R. . (2010). Antidumping and the global financial crisis: the impact on Latin America and the Caribbean. ECLAC. Washington.
  • FINGER, J. M.,HALL, K.,NELSON, . (1982). The political economy of administered protection. American Economic Review. 72. 452
  • FIRME, V. A. C.,VASCONCELOS, C. R. . (2012). Impactos de medidas antidumping adotadas pelos EUA sobre o setor siderúrgico de Minas Gerais...
  • FIRME, V. A. C.,VASCONCELOS, C. R. F. (2013). Evolução no uso do mecanismo antidumping após a Rodada Uruguai. 41ºEncontro Nacional de Economia...
  • FIRME, V. A. C.,VASCONCELOS, C. R. F. (2015). Evolution in the use of antidumping mechanism after Uruguay round. Revista Economia. 16. 321
  • FRANCOIS, J. F.,NEILS, . (2004). Political influence in a new antidumping regime. Tinbergen Institute. Rotterdam.
  • GREENE, W. . (1997). Econometrics Analysis. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • GREENE, W. . (2002). Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  • GURMU, . (1991). Tests for Detecting Overdispersion in the Positive Poisson Regression Model. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics....
  • HANSEN, W. L.,PRUSA, T. . (1997). The economics and politics of trade policy: an empirical analysis of ITC decision making. Review of International...
  • (2011). IBGE.
  • (2011). INDEC.
  • (2011). IMF/ISF.
  • IRWIN, D. . (2005). The Rise of U.S. Antidumping Activity in Historical Perspective. The World Economy. 28. 651
  • KNETTER, M. M.,PRUSA, T. . (2003). Macroeconomic factors and antidumping filings: evidence from four countries. Journal of International Economics....
  • KONING, J.,VANDENBUSSCHE, H.,SPRINGAEL, . (1999). Import Diversion under European Antidumping Policy. National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • LEE, . (1986). Specification Tests for Poisson Regression Models. International Economic Review. 27. 689-706
  • LEIDY, M. . (1997). Macroeconomic Conditions and Pressures for Protection under Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Laws: Empirical Evidence...
  • MOORE, M. O.,ZANARDI, . (2011). Trade Liberalization and Antidumping: Is There a Substitution Effect?. Review of Development Economics. 15....
  • (2011). MIND/SPGC.
  • MIRANDA, . (2003). Aplicação do direito Antidumping e o impacto sobre as exportações brasileiras. Documento IPEA/CEPAL.
  • NELSON, . (2004). The Political Economy of Antidumping: A Survey. European Journal of Political Economy. 22. 554
  • NIELS, G.,FRANCOIS, . (2006). Business cycles, the exchange rate, and demand for antidumping in México. Review of Development Economics. 10....
  • (2011). OECD stat.
  • OSSA, . (2011). A “New Trade” Theory of GATT/WTO Negotiations. Journal of Political Economy. 119.
  • PRUSA, . (1996). The Trade Effects of U.S. Antidumping Actions. National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge.
  • PRUSA, T. J. (1999). On the spread and impact of antidumping. National Bureau of Economic Research. Cambridge.
  • QUINN, J.,SLAYTON, . (1982). Non-tariff Barriers After the Tokyo Round. Proceedings of a Conference Sponsored by the Canada-united States...
  • STAIGER, R.,WOLAK, . (1994). Measuring industry-specific protection: antidumping in the United States. Brookings papers on Economic Activity....
  • SUDSAWASD, . (2012). Tariff Liberalization and the Rise of Anti-dumping Use: Empirical Evidence from Across World Regions. The International...
  • TAKACS, W. . (1981). Pressures for Protectionism: an Empirical Analysis. Economic Inquiry. 19. 687
  • TREBILCOCK, M.,HOWSE, . (2002). The Regulation of International Trade. Routledge. London.
  • VANDENBUSSCHE, H.,ZANARDI, . (2010). The Chilling Trade Effects of Antidumping Proliferation. European Economic Review. 54. 760777
  • VASCONCELOS, C. R. F.,FIRME, V. A. . (2011). Efetividade do Instrumento Antidumping no Brasil entre 1990 e 2007. Revista EconomiA. 12. 165
  • WILLIG, R. . (1998). Brookings Trade Fórum 1998. Brookings Institution Press. Washington.
  • WOOLDRIDGE, J. . (1996). Handbook of Applied Econometrics. Blackwell. Malden, MA.
  • WOOLDRIDGE, J. . (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. The MIT Press. London (England).
  • (2015). Trade Topics/Anti-Dumping.
  • ZANARDI, . (2004). Anti-dumping: What are the Numbers to Discuss at Doha?. The Word Economy. 27. 403