The Concept of «Right» and the Focal Point of Juridicity in Debate between Villey, Tierney, Finnis and Hervada

• Autores: Petar Popovic
• Localización: Persona y derecho: Revista de fundamentación de las Instituciones Jurídicas y de Derechos Humanos, ISSN 0211-4526, Nº. 78, 2018, págs. 65-103
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.15581/011.78.55-103
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 1 Cita
• Resumen

  • The article revisits and seeks to clarify and provide with new perspectives the debate between the theoretical approaches of four authors – Michel Villey, Brian Tierney, John Finnis and Javier Hervada – in their accounts of the contemporary formulation of the concept of “ius”. Although all authors analyzed in the paper share common thomistic roots in their respective argumentations on the essential meaning and content of the concept of “right”, they still differ in their accounts with regard to the understanding of Aquinas’s classical juridical realism, the relation between “law” and “right” and the role of subjective rights in history and in today’s juridical discourse. The paper seeks to highlight how such comparative perspective reveals not only the contrasts in the theoretical accounts of these authors with regard to the structural “locus” of the focal point of juridicity, but also renders manifest certain perspectives of integration of each approach with contributions achieved by the other interlocutors of the debate.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Hittinger, R., The First Grace: Rediscovering the Natural Law in a Post-Christian World, ISI Books, Wilmington, 2003, p. 115.
  • Errázuriz, C. J., «Sul rapporto tra diritto e giustizia: valore e attualità della tradizione classica e Cristiana», Persona y Derecho, 40...
  • Villey, M., Le droit et les droits de l’homme, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 1983, pp. 24-25.
  • Caparros, E., «Presentation of the English Edition», in Hervada, J., Critical Introduction to Natural Law, Wilson & Lafleur Ltée, Montréal,...
  • Voilley, G., «Translator’s Introduction», in Villey, M, «Epitome of Classical Natural Law (Part One)», Griffith Law Review, 9 (2000), p. 75.
  • Villey, M., «Abrégé du droit naturel classique», in Lecons d’histoire de la philospohie du droit, Dalloz, Paris, 2002, pp. 109-165.
  • Villey, M., «Sur les essais d’application de la logique déontique au droit», Archives de philosophie du droit, 17 (1972), p. 407;
  • Villey, M., «Le droit dans les choses», in aMselek, P. and Grzegorczyk, c. (ed.), Controverses autour de l’ontologie du droit, Presses Universitaires...
  • Villey, M., «Dikaion – Torah (II). Seconde scolastique», in Critique de la pensée juridique moderne, Dalloz, Paris, 1976.
  • Finnis, J., «Grounding Human Rights in Natural Law», American Journal of Jurisprudence, 60 (2015), p. 214.
  • Rabbi-Baldi Cabanillas, R., La filosofía jurídica de Michel Villey, EUNSA, Pamplona, 1990, p. 438.
  • Villey, M., «Epitome of Classical Natural Law (Part Two)», Griffith Law Review, 10 (2001).
  • Villey, M., La formation de la pensée juridique moderne, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris, 2013, p. 228.
  • Villey, M., «La genèse du droit subjectif chez Guillaume d’Occam», Archives de philosophie du droit, 9
  • Villey, M., «Les origines de la notion de droit subjectif», in Lecons d’histoire de la philospohie du droit, Dalloz, Paris, 2002, p. 234.
  • Villey, M., «Les institutes de Gaius et l’idée du droit subjective», in Lecons d’histoire de la philospohie du droit, p. 182.
  • Finnis, J., Natural Law and Natural Rights, 2d ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2011. Sol, T., «La controverse Villey-Tierney sur la...
  • Guzmán Brito, A., «Historia de la denominación del derecho-facultad como ‘subjectivo’», Revista de Estudios Histórico-Jurídicos, 25 (2003)
  • Sol, T., «La notion de droit subjectif chez Villey et Hervada», Ius Ecclesiae, 28 (2016).
  • Hart, H.L.A., «Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals», Harvard Law Review, 71 (1958), pp. 593-629;
  • Fuller, L.L., «Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart», Harvard Law Review, 71 (1958), pp. 630-672.
  • Hart, H.L.A., The Concept of Law, 2d ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994, pp. 188, 193.
  • H. B., Human Rights: Fact or Fancy, Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge, 1985;
  • George, R. P., «Natural Law and Positive Law», in In Defense of Natural Law, Oxford University Press, New York, 1999, pp. 102-112.
  • Mcinerny, R., «Natural Law and Human Rights», American Journal of Jurisprudence, 36 (1991), pp. 1-14.
  • Tierney, B., «Villey, Ockham and the Origin of Individual Rights», in The Idea of Natural Rights: Studies on Natural Rights, Natural...
  • Tierney, B., «Origins of Natural Rights Language: Texts and Contexts, 1150-1250», in The Idea of Natural Rights, pp. 43-77.
  • Sol, T., «La notion de ius en droit sacramentaire chez Gratien et les décrétistes», Ius Ecclesiae, 27 (2015), pp. 380, 391-394.
  • Tierney, B., «Natural Law and Natural Rights: Old Problems and Recent Approaches», The Review of Politics, 64 (2002).
  • Tierney, B., «Author’s Rejoinder», The Review of Politics, 64 (2002), pp. 416-417.
  • Tierney, B., «The Idea of Natural Rights – Origins and Persistence», Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights, 2 (2004), p. 8.
  • Tierney, B., Liberty and Law: The Idea of Permissive Natural Law, 1100-1800, The Catholic University of America Press, Washington D.C., 2014.
  • Finnis, J., «Un ouvrage récent sur Bentham», Archives de philosophie du droit, 17 (1972), p. 424.
  • Pennington, K., «The History of Rights in Western Thought», Emory Law Journal, 47 (1998), p. 237.
  • Finnis, J., «A Grand Tour of Legal Theory», in Finnis, J., Philosophy of Law. Collected Essays: volume IV, Oxford University Press, Oxford,...
  • Feld, W.N., «Some Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning», Yale Law Journal, 23 (1913), pp. 28-59
  • Feld, W.N., «Fundamental Legal Conceptions as Applied in Judicial Reasoning», Yale Law Journal, 26 (1917), pp. 710-770.
  • Finnis, J., Aquinas: Moral, Political and Legal Theory, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998, p. 135.
  • Finnis, J., «Aquinas on Ius and Hart on Rights: A Response to Tierney», The Review of Politics, 64 (2002), p. 408.
  • Demelemestre, G., «La réception de l’interprétation française des theories du droit naturel dans le monde anglo-saxon», Archives de philosophie...
  • Hervada, J., What is Law? The Modern Response of Juridical Realism: An Introduction to Law, Wilson & Lafleur Ltée, Montréal, 2009.
  • Hervada, J., Lecciones propedéuticas de filosofía del derecho, EUNSA, Pamplona, 1992.
  • Hervada, J., «Apuntes para una exposición del realismo jurídico clásico», Persona y Derecho, 18 (1988).
  • Schouppe, J.-P., «El realismo jurídico de Javier Hervada», in Natura, Ius, Ratio: Estudios sobre la filosofía jurídica de Javier Hervada,...
  • Pozzo, M., L’evoluzione della nozione di diritto nel pensiero canonistico di Javier Hervada, EDUSC, Roma, 2005, pp. 47-73, 125-172, 329-354.
  • Hervada, J., «Le droit dans le réalisme juridique classique», Droits, 10 (1989), p. 31.
  • Schouppe, J.-P., Le réalisme juridique, E. Story-Scientia, Bruxelles, 1987, p. 154. 1
  • Errázuriz, c. j., «El matrimonio como conjunction entre amor y derecho en una optica realista y personalista», Scripta Theologica, 26 (1994),...
  • Hervada, J., «Esencia del matrimonio y consentimiento matrimonial», Persona y Derecho, 9 (1982) : 149-179.
  • Hervada, J., Vetera et Nova: Cuestiones de derecho canonico y afines: 1958-2004, Navarra Gráfica Ediciones, Pamplona, 2005, p. 937.
  • Puig, F., La esencia del matrimonio a la luz del realismo jurídico, Navarra Gráfica Ediciones, Pamplona, 2004, pp. 235-248.