Oliver Houck
El presente estudio aborda el desarrollo del reconocimiento de los derechos a la naturaleza y a los animales partiendo de fallos recientes como el Tribunal de Mendoza, Argentina, 2015, reconociendo el habeas corpus para un chimpancé mantenido en cautividad, o el Alto Tribunal de Uttarakhand, India, 2017, reconociendo a la naturaleza como una entidad legal/persona legal/persona jurídica/persona moral/persona artificial que tiene el estatus de una persona jurídica. Los derechos legales de la naturaleza empiezan por su reconocimiento como parte interesada. Cabe sospechar que la oposición a ello se basa en el temor de que implica necesariamente un derecho de la naturaleza a existir, lo que siempre ha constituido la manzana de la discordia
Noah's second voyage: the rights of nature as law. The present study addresses the development of the recognition of the rights to nature and to animals starting from recent rulings such as the Mendoza Court, Argentina, 2015 reconfirming the habeas corpus for a chimpanzee kept in captivity or the High Court of Uttarakhand, India, 2017 recognizing nature as a legal entity / legal person / legal person / moral person / artificial person having the status of a legal person, with all the corresponding rights ... of a living person,. The legal rights of nature begin with their recognition as an interested party. It may be suspected that the opposition to this is based on the fear that it necessarily implies a right of nature to exist, which has constituted the apple of discord all the time