El papel de la experiencia histórica y la confianza en la comunicación de tecnologías emergentes: el caso de las nanotecnologías

• Guillermo Foladori ^[1] ; Miguel García Guerrero ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas

     Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas

     México

     
• Localización: Historia y comunicación social, ISSN 1137-0734, Vol. 22, Nº 1, 2017, págs. 221-230
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.5209/hics.55909
• Títulos paralelos:
  • The role of historical experience and trust in the communication of emerging technologies: the case of nanotechnologies
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Dialnet Métricas: 2 Citas
• Resumen
  • español

    Existe abundante literatura sobre los cambios en la relación Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad en las últimas décadas, así como la evolución de la comunicación pública de la ciencia y tecnología (CPCT), sin embargo se ha dado poca atención al origen de posturas antagónicas en controversias relacionadas con la ciencia y tecnología (C&T). Este artículo utiliza la dicotomía relaciones técnicas- relaciones sociales como instrumental teórico para explicar la razón de fondo de la diferente percepción de una tecnología emergente en diferentes sectores sociales, y se usa el caso empírico de las nanotecnologías como ejemplo. Se concluye que la experiencia histórica de las relaciones sociales debe considerarse un criterio esencial para el análisis de riesgo y para la práctica de la CPCT

  • English

    Literature on the changes in the Science, Technology and Society relationship and the evolution of Public Communication of Science and Technology (PCST) over the past decades is abundant, although there has been little emphasis on the origin of opposing positions in science and technology controversies. We use the dichotomy of technical and social relations as a theoretical tool to explain the roots for different perception of emerging technologies in various sectors, with nanotechnologies as an empirical example. It is concluded that historical experience, related to social relations, must be considered an essential criterion for risk assessment and PCST practice

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Althusser, L. (2008). On Ideology. London, UK: Verso.
  • Avis, R. (1981). Social and Technical Relations: The Case of Further Education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2(2), 145–161....
  • Bensaude-Vincent, B. (2012). Nanotechnology: a new regime for the public in science? Scientiae Studia, 10(SPE), 85–94. http://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-31662012000500005
  • Bubela, T., Nisbet, M. C., Borchelt, R., Brunger, F., Critchley, C., Einsiedel, E., … Caulfield, T. (2009). Science communication reconsidered....
  • Calvo, M. (1997). Objetivos de la divulgación de la ciencia. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación Chasqui, (60), 38–42. Retrieved from...
  • Digangi, J. (2003, September). US intervention in EU Chemical Policy. Environmental Health Fund. Disponible en http://docplayer.net/2967590-Us-intervention-in-eu-chemical-policy.html
  • Durant, J. (1999). Participatory technology assessment and the democratic model of the public understanding of science. Science and Public...
  • EEA (2002). Late lessons from early warnings: the precautionary principle 1896-2000. European Environmental Agency. Disponible en http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environmental_issue_report_2001_22/Issue_Report_No_22.pdf
  • EEA (2013). Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution, innovation. European Environmental Agency. EEA Report No 1/2013. Disponible...
  • Einsiedel, E. (2008). Public participation and dialogue. In Handbook of public communication of science and technology (pp. 172–184). London;...
  • Epstein, S. (1998). Impure science: AIDS, activism, and the politics of knowledge (Reprint). Berkeley, Cal.: Univ. of California Press.
  • Falkner, R., & Jaspers, N. (2012). Regulating Nanotechnology. Risk, Uncertainty and the Global Governance Gap. Global Environmental Politics,...
  • Foladori, G., & Invernizzi, N. (2008). The workers push to democratize nanotechnology. In E. Fisher, C. Selin, & J. Wetmore (Eds.),...
  • Foladori, G., & Invernizzi, N. (2016). La regulación de las nanotecnologías: una mirada desde las diferencias EUA-UE. Vigilância Sanitária...
  • Freudenburg, W. (1988). Perceived risk, real risk: social science and the art of probabilistic risk assessment. Science, 242(4875), 44–49....
  • García Guerrero, M., & Foladori, G. (2015). Divulgación de Ciencia y Tecnología: los límites del enfoque técnico en las nanotecnologías....
  • Golan, T. (2004). Laws of men and laws of nature: the history of scientific expert testimony in England and America. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard...
  • Gorz, A. (1976). The Division of Labour: The Labour Process and Class-struggle in Modern Capitalism. BRILL.
  • Hilgartner, S. (1990). The Dominant View of Popularization: Conceptual Problems, Political Uses. Social Studies of Science, 20(3), 519–539....
  • Lee, C.-J., Scheufele, D. A., & Lewenstein, B. V. (2005). Public Attitudes toward Emerging Technologies: Examining the Interactive Effects...
  • Lewenstein, B. V. (1995). Science and the media. In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies ed. by Sheila Jasanoff et al. (London: Sage)...
  • Lewenstein, B. V. (2005). What Counts as a Social and Ethical Issue in Nanotechnology? HYLE-International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry,...
  • Lewenstein, B. V. (2016). Expertise, democracy and science communication. Presented at the 14th Public Communication of Science and Technology...
  • Marx, K. (1993). Production, consumption, distribution, exchange (circulation). In M. Nicolaus (Trans.), Grundrisse: foundations of the critique...
  • Marx, K. (2011). Capital, Volume One: A Critique of Political Economy. Mineola, N.Y: Dover Publications.
  • Myers, G. (2003). Discourse Studies of Scientific Popularization: Questioning the Boundaries. Discourse Studies, 5(2), 265–279. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461445603005002006
  • Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. American...
  • Olivé, L. (2007). La ciencia y la tecnología en la sociedad del conocimiento. Fondo de Cultura Economica.
  • Parker, M., & Slaughter, J. (1988). Choosing sides: unions and the team concept. Boston: South End Press.
  • Priest, S. (2012). Nanotechnology and the public: risk perception and risk communication. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  • Priest, S. H., Bonfadelli, H., & Rusanen, M. (2003). The “Trust Gap” Hypothesis: Predicting Support for Biotechnology Across National...
  • Sánchez Vázquez, A. (1984). La ideología de la “neutralidad ideológica” en ciencias sociales. In Ensayos marxistas sobre filosofía e ideología...
  • Scheufele, D. (2014). Science communication as political communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(Supplement_4),...
  • Wynne, B. (1995). Public understanding of science. In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies ed. by Sheila Jasanoff et al. (London: Sage)...
  • Wynne, B. (1999). Knowledges in context. In Communicating Science: Contexts and Channels (OU Reader) (pp. 4–13). Routledge.
  • IFCS. (2008, March 31). FORO VI. Sexta sesión del Foro Intergubernamental sobre seguridad química. Intergovernmental Forum on Chemical Safety....
  • IUF. (2007). IUF resolution on nanotechnologies. IUF (International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and...
  • Marx, K. (n.d.). Capital Volume One. Part I: Commodities and Money Chapter One. Section 2 - The two-fold Character of the Labour Embodied...
  • Monty’S. (n.d.). Monty’s NanoBoost. Retrieved June 20, 2016, from https://www.southernstates.com/catalog/vsearch.aspx?searchterm=nano
  • N?IC. (2016, March 1). Specific Chemical (Active Ingredient) Information. Retrieved June 21, 2016, from http://npic.orst.edu/ingred/specchem.html...
  • Parker, M. (2015, August 9). A Union Strategy for Skilled Work and Technological Change. Labor Notes. Disponible en http://www.net4dem.org/cyrev/archive/issue6/articles/UnionStrategy/UnionStrategy.pdf...
  • Red Surcos (2012). Fitosanitarios con nanotecnología. Descargado el 20 de junio de 2016, de http://redsurcos.com/tecnologias.php?idioma=esp