Una aproximación sustantivay procesal al concurso de acreedores de persona física en el derecho concursal estadounidense

• Autores: Killian Beneyto Pallás
• Localización: Revista Boliviana de Derecho, ISSN-e 2070-8157, Nº. 24, 2017, págs. 192-225
• Idioma: español
• Títulos paralelos:
  • Regulation of Personal Bankruptcy under its procedure rules and the United States Code
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen
  • español

    La tan reiterada cultura del emprendedor esconde una innegable fuente de inspiración en el ámbito sociocultural estadounidense. Este familiar vocablo de moda, aclamado política y socialmente, también guarda su importancia en el último escalón sustantivo y jurisdiccional de la regulación de la insolvencia de una persona física: su salida de tal insolvencia -parte sustantiva- y cómo articularla -parte jurisdiccional-. Todo ello motiva, junto con el interés propio de cualquier estudio de derecho comparado, la elección del derecho concursal estadounidense como fuente de estudio, crítica y contraste con nuestra Ley Concursal.

  • English

    Spain’s recent efforts to encourage an “entrepreneurial culture” are certainly inspired by the american dream’s most renowned ideals of success and wealth. This whole social movement may also act as an influential key factor with regards to the legal treatment of personal bankruptcy, by means of establishing its ultimate goal: a fresh start (aka discharge and exemption laws) and how it must be conducted (aka its legal procedure). For this reason, it is our aim to examine from a comparative law perspective the U.S. Bankruptcy Law and its procedure rules, considering its main benefits and downsides in contrast with the Spanish Insolvency Act

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Attanasio, J. y Goldstein, J. K.: Understanding Constitutional Law, ed. Matthew Bender & Company Inc.: 2012, pp. 58 et seq.
  • Austin, D. A.: “Bankruptcy and the Myth of Uniform Laws”, Seton Hall Law Review, 2012, vol. 42, no. 3.
  • Baird, D. G.: Elements of bankruptcy, ed. Foundation Press, 2014, p. 204.
  • Blum, B. A.: Bankruptcy and Debtor/Creditor, ed. Aspen Publishers, 2006, p. 89.
  • Carter, J. H. y Fellas, J.: International Commercial Arbitration in New York, ed. Oxford University Press, 2010, p. 42.
  • Coffin, K. G.: “Limiting Legislative Courts: Protecting Article III from Article I Evisceration”, Barry Law Review, 2011, vol. 16.
  • Cook, M. L.: Bankruptcy Litigation Manual, ed. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business, 2014, pp. 120 y ss.
  • Cuena Casas, M. en AA.VV.: El Derecho de la insolvencia, ed. Tirant lo Blanch, 2015, pp. 106 y 107.
  • Damián Moreno, J.: AA.VV.: Derecho procesal concursal, ed. Marcial Pons, 2008, p. 157.
  • Dodge, J.: “Reconceptualizing Non-Article III Tribunals”, Minnesota Law Review, 2015, vol.99.
  • Frey, M. A. y Swinson, S. K.: Introduction to bankruptcy law, ed. Delmar, 2013, p. 23.
  • Gerdano, S. J.: The 2015 Bankruptcy Yearbook & Almanac, ed. Kerry A. Mastroianni, 2015, pp. 2 y 3.
  • Ginsberg, R. E., Martin, R. D. y KeLLey, S. V.: Ginsberg & Martin on Bankruptcy, ed. Wolters Kluwer, 2015, p. 34.
  • Jordan Tabb, C.: Law of Bankruptcy, ed. West Academic Publishing, 2014, p. 131.
  • Jordan Tabb, C.: “The History of the Bankruptcy Laws in the United States”, American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review, 1995, vol. 3.
  • Levin, R. B. en AA.VV.: Fundamentals of bankruptcy law, ed. Aliaba, 2010, p. 17.
  • Malins Rose, W.: Abandoned property act to Equitable title, ed. Bancroft-Whitney, 1903, p. 294.
  • Pfander, J. E. y Birk, D. D.: “Article III Judicial Power, the Adverse-Party Requirement, and Non-Contentious Jurisdiction”, Yale Law Journal,...
  • Pulgar Ezquerra, J.: “Rescisión concursal y aprobación judicial del convenio: cláusulas convencionalmente pactadas”, Revista de Derecho Mercantil,...
  • Ralph Mecham, L.: Judicial Business of the United States Courts, ed. Government Printing Office, 2008, p. 135.
  • Regis Noel, F.: A history of the bankruptcy law, ed. William S. Hein & Co Inc.: 2003, pp. 43 et 65.
  • Roberts, D. M.: “The Myth of Uniformity in Federal Civil Procedure: Federal Civil Rule 83 and District Court Local Rulemaking Powers”, University...
  • Satorius, J.: “Strike or Dismiss: Interpretation of the BAPCPA 109(h) Credit Counseling Requirement”, Fordham Law Review, 2007, vol. 75.
  • Wilde, C.: “The Chandler Act”, Indiana Law Journal, 1938, vol. XIV, no. 2.