Acceso usuarios
Enrique Lalaguna Holzwarth
El presente estudio tiene como objeto el análisis de una reciente doctrina comunitaria del TJUE a raíz de sus sentencias 14 de septiembre de 2016 (asuntos C-16/15, C-184/15, C-197/15 y C-596/14). En dichos pronunciamientos el TJUE estima contraria al Derecho de la Unión la utilización de nombramientos de duración determinada sucesivos para atender necesidades permanentes en el sector de los servicios de salud. Asimismo, señala que la normativa española debe establecer medidas efectivas para evitar los abusos en lo referente a las relaciones de servicio de duración determinada al margen de su regulación a través del Derecho laboral o administrativo. Finalmente, se analiza la cuestión de si determinados contratos de duración determinada deben recibir a su finalización una indemnización equivalente a la que actualmente perciben los trabajadores fijos. En suma, el TJUE tratando distintos aspectos vinculados a la contratación temporal en nuestro país considera que la legislación nacional es contraria al Acuerdo marco sobre trabajo de duración determinada, de 18 de marzo de 1999, que integra la Directiva 1999/70/CE del Consejo, de 28 de junio de 1999 relativa al Acuerdo Marco de la CES, UNICE y CEEP sobre trabajo de duración determinada.
The specific subject of study is based on recent Court of Justice of the European Union judgments of 14 September 2016 (Case- C-16/15, C-184/15, C-197/15 y C-596/14). In these rulings the Court of Justice of the European Union considers contrary to the European Union law the renewal of successive fixed-term employment contracts in the public health sector in order to ensure the provision of certain services when those needs are fixed and permanent. Likewise, declares than the Spanish legislation should create effective measures in order to avoid abuses regarding fixed-term services relations apart from the administrative or labour regulation of these relations. Finally, examines whether some temporary labour contract should receive the same compensation upon their termination than the Spanish legislation provides to the fixed employees. In sum, the Court of Justice of the European Union dealing with different aspects related to the temporary contracts in our country concluded that Spanish The specific subject of study is based on recent Court of Justice of the European Union judgments of 14 September 2016 (Case- C-16/15, C-184/15, C-197/15 y C-596/14). In these rulings the Court of Justice of the European Union considers contrary to the European Union law the renewal of successive fixed-term employment contracts in the public health sector in order to ensure the provision of certain services when those needs are fixed and permanent. Likewise, declares than the Spanish legislation should create effective measures in order to avoid abuses regarding fixed-term services relations apart from the administrative or labour regulation of these relations. Finally, examines whether some temporary labour contract should receive the same compensation upon their termination than the Spanish legislation provides to the fixed employees. In sum, the Court of Justice of the European Union dealing with different aspects related to the temporary contracts in our country concluded that Spanish
