Three twenty-first-century disaster films, the ideology of science and the future of democratic debate

• Autores: Pieter Maeseele, Laurens Van Der Steen
• Localización: Catalan journal of communication & cultural studies, ISSN 1757-1898, Vol. 8, Nº. 2, 2016, págs. 189-205
• Idioma: inglés
• DOI: 10.1386/cjcs.8.2.189_1
• Texto completo no disponible (Saber más ...)
• Resumen

  • While news media representations of science and technology have received ample attention in academic research, there is a lack of comparable research into disaster films. Drawing on an in-depth qualitative content analysis, this article aims to explore the representation of science in three recent disaster films: The Day After Tomorrow (Emmerich, 2004), Contagion (Soderbergh, 2011) and Rise of the Planet of the Apes (Wyatt, 2011). We find these films’ representation of science contributing to a reification of science and the promotion of the ‘ideology of science’. We conclude by discussing how this representation potentially shapes the context in which late modern risks are approached in social and political debates, and to what extent this might contribute to facilitating or impeding democratic debate and citizenship.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • Anderson, A., Allan, S., Petersen, A. and Wilkinson, C. (2005), ‘The framing of nanotechnologies in the British newspaper press’, Science...
  • Baskaran, A. and Boden, R. (2004), ‘Science: A controversial commodity’, Science, Technology & Society, 9: 1, pp. 1−26.
  • Basu, A. and Hogard, E. (2008), ‘Fit for public consumption? An exploratory study of the reporting of nutrition research in UK tabloids with...
  • Bauer, M. W. and Bucchi, M. (eds) (2007), Journalism, Science and Society: Science Communication between News and Public Relations, New York,...
  • Bauer, M. W. and Gregory, J. (2007), ‘From journalism to corporate communication in post-war Britain’, in M. W. Bauer and M. Bucchi (eds),...
  • Bauer, M. W., Durant, J. and Ragnarsdottir, A. (1995), Science and Technology in the British Press (1946−1990), London, UK: The Science Museum.
  • Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Boschen, S., Kastenhofer, K., Rust, I., Soentgen, J. and Wehling, P. (2010), ‘Scientific nonknowledge and its political dynamics: The cases...
  • Bucchi, M. (1996), ‘When scientists turn to the public: Alternative routes in science communication’, Public Understanding of Science, 5:...
  • Bucchi, M. and Mazzolini, R. G. (2003), ‘Big Science, little news: Science coverage in the Italian daily press, 1946–1997’, Public Understanding...
  • Carsten, L. D. and Illman, D. L. (2002), ‘Perceptions of accuracy in science writing’, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 45:...
  • Carvalho, A. (2005), ‘Representing the politics of the greenhouse effect: Discursive strategies in the British media’, Critical Discourse...
  • Carvalho, A. (2007), ‘Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: Re-reading news on climate change’, Public Understanding...
  • Carvalho, A. (2010), ‘Media(ted) discourses and climate change: A focus on political subjectivity and (dis)engagement’, WIREs Climate Change,...
  • Carvalho, A. and Peterson, T. R. (eds) (2012), Climate Change Politics: Communication and Public Engagement, Amherst, MA: Cambria Press.
  • Caulfield, T. (2005), ‘Popular media, biotechnology and the “cycle of hype”’, Journal of Health Law and Policy, 5: 2, pp. 213−33.
  • Corbett, J. B. and Durfee, J. L. (2004), ‘Testing public (un)certainty of science: Media representations of global warming’, Science Communication,...
  • Doyle, J. (2011), ‘Acclimatizing nuclear? Climate change, nuclear power and the reframing of risk in the UK news media’, International Communication...
  • Dunwoody, S. (1982), ‘A question of accuracy’, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 25: 4, pp. 196−99.
  • During, S. (2007), The Cultural Studies Reader, London, UK: Routledge Publishers.
  • Edmond, G. and Mercer, D. (1999), ‘Creating (public) science in the Noah’s Ark case’, Public Understanding of Science, 8: 4, pp. 317−43.
  • Ellis, R. (2011), ‘Contagion film is not far from the truth, warns virus scientist’, The Guardian, 22 October, http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2011/...
  • Emmerich, R. (2004), The Day After Tomorrow, New York: 20th Century Fox.
  • Farago, P. (1976), Science and the Media, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
  • Feil, K. (2005), Dying for a Laugh: Disaster Movies and the Camp Imagination, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
  • Gaskell, G. and Bauer, M. W. (eds) (2001), Biotechnology 1996−2000: The Years of Controversy, London, UK: Science Museum.
  • Goeminne, G. (2010), ‘Climate policy is dead, long live climate politics!’, Ethics, Place and Environment, 13: 2, pp. 207−14.
  • Hansen, A. (1991), ‘The media and the social construction of the environment’, Media, Culture & Society, 13: 4, pp. 443−58.
  • Hart, P. S. and Leisorowitz, A. A. (2009), ‘Finding the teachable moment: An analysis of information-seeking behavior on global warming related...
  • Hilgartner, S. (1990), ‘The dominant view of popularization: Conceptual problems, political uses’, Social Studies of Science, 20: 3, pp. 519−39.
  • Jameson, F. (2005), Archaeologies of the Future: The Desire Called Utopia and other Science Fictions, London, UK: Verso Books.
  • Keane, S. (2006), Disaster Movies: The Cinema of Catastrophe, London, UK: Wallflower Press.
  • Kirby, D. A. (2008), ‘Cinematic science’, in M. Bucchi and B. Trench (eds), Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, New...
  • Kleinman, D. L. (2005), Science and Technology in Society: From Biotechnology to the Internet, Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Krieghbaum, H. (1967), Science and the Mass Media, New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Leisorowitz, A. A. (2004), ‘Before and after the day after tomorrow: A US study of climate change risk perception’, Environment, 46: 9, pp....
  • Levidow, L. (1999), ‘Britain’s biotechnology controversy: Elusive science, contested expertise’, New Genetics and Society, 18: 1, pp. 47−64.
  • Lewenstein, B. V. (1995), ‘From fax to facts: Communication in the cold fusion saga’, Social Studies of Science, 25: 3, pp. 403−36.
  • Lowe, T., Brown, K., Dessai, S. Dora, M. D., Haynes, K. and Vincent, K. (2006), ‘Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions...
  • Machin, A. (2013), Negotiating Climate Change: Radical Democracy and the Illusion of Consensus, London, UK: Zed Books.
  • Maeseele, P. (2009), ‘NGOs and GMOs: A case study in alternative science communication’, Javnost − The Public, 16: 4, pp. 55−72.
  • Maeseele, P. (2011), ‘On news media and democratic debate: Framing agricultural biotechnology in Northern Belgium’, International Communication...
  • Maeseele, P. (2013), ‘On Media and Science in Late Modern Societies’, in E. Cohen (eds), Communication Yearbook 37, New York, NY: Routledge...
  • Maeseele, P. (2015), ‘Risk conflicts: Mediating environmental change we can believe in’, Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 35:...
  • Maeseele, P., Allgaier, J. and Martinelli, L. (2013), ‘Bio-objects and the media: The role of Communication in bio-objectification processes’,...
  • McCormick, S. (2007), ‘Democratizing science movements: A new framework for mobilization and contestation’, Social Studies of Science, 37:...
  • McCright, A. and Dunlap, R. (2010), ‘Anti-reflexivity: The American Conservative movement’s success in undermining climate science and policy’,...
  • Methmann, C. and Rothe, D. (2012), ‘Politics for the day after tomorrow: The logic of apocalypse in global climate politics’, Security Dialogue,...
  • Nelkin, D. (1995), Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology, New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
  • Nisbet, M. and Huge, M. (2006), ‘Attention cycles and frames in the plant biotechnology debate: Managing power and participation through the...
  • Nisbet, M. C. and Lewenstein, B. V. (2002), ‘Biotechnology and the American media: The policy process and the elite press, 1970 to 1999’,...
  • O’Sullivan, T. (1994), Key Concepts in Communication and Cultural Studies, London, UK: Routledge Publishers.
  • Peters, H. P., Brossard, D., Cheveigné, S. de, Dunwoody, S., Kallfass, M., Miller, S. and Tsuchida, S. (2008), ‘Science-media interface: It’s...
  • Soderbergh, S. (2011), Contagion, New York: 20th Century Fox.
  • Sontag, S. ([1965] 2009), ‘The imagination of disaster’, in S. S. Redmond (ed.), Liquid Metal: The Science Fiction Reader [Against Interpretation],...
  • Strauss, A. L. and Corbin, J. M. (1998), Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Thousand...
  • Suvin, D. (1979), Metamorphoses of Science Fiction: On the Poetics and History of a Literary Genre, Yale, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Väliverronen, E. (2004), ‘Stories of the “medicine cow”: Representations of future promises in media discourse’, Public Understanding of Science,...
  • Van Dijck, J. (1998), Imagenation: Popular images of genetics, New York, NY: New York University Press.
  • Verstraeten, H. (1996), ‘The media and the transformation of the public sphere. A contribution for a critical political economy of the public...
  • Von Burg, R. (2012), ‘Decades Away or The Day After Tomorrow?: Rhetoric, film, and the global warming debate’, Critical Studies in Media Communication,...
  • Wyatt, R. (2011), Rise of the Planet of the Apes, New York, NY: 20th Century Fox.
  • Žižek, S. (2010), Living in the End Times, London, UK: Verso Books.