Uma hermenêutica das conversações interiores: a noção de sujeito em Margaret Archer e em Hans-George Gadamer

• Autores: Cynthia Lins Hamlin
• Localización: Revista Brasileira de Sociologia, ISSN-e 2318-0544, ISSN 2317-8507, Vol. 2, Nº. 4, 2014 (Ejemplar dedicado a: jul.-dez.), págs. 13-48
• Idioma: portugués
• DOI: 10.20336/rbs.76
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo (pdf)
• Resumen

  • O presente trabalho consiste em  uma  reflexão sobre  a ontolo- gia do sujeito implícita à teoria  da agência de Margaret Archer. Com base  nas  vertentes mais individualistas do pragmatismo, Archer apropria-se da  noção  de  conversações interiores a fim de destacar o caráter reflexivo e privado do self, revelando uma concepção de  sujeito hiperreflexivo e autocentrado. A herme- nêutica de Gadamer é apresentada como uma  alternativa a esta ontologia. Argumento que  sua  teoria da  interpretação repousa sobre  uma  concepção dialógica de  sujeito cujas  conversações interiores sublinham a centralidade das práticas na construção da  subjetividade. Ao estabelecer que  a (auto)compreensão de- pende de um encontro com a diferença e a alteridade, Gadamer, ao mesmo tempo que nega a autotransparência e o fechamento do sujeito, abre  a possibilidade  de (auto)consciência e reflexi- vidade na agência humana.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • ADAMS, Matthew (2006). “Hybridizing Habitus and Reflexivity: towards an understanding of contemporary identity?”. Sociology, 40 (3): 511-528.
  • ARCHER, Margaret (1988). Culture and agency: the place of culture in social theory. Cambridge: CUP.
  • ________. (1995). Realist social theory: the morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: CUP.
  • (2000 a) “Realismo e o Problema da Agência”. Estudos de
  • Sociologia 6 (2), p 51-75. Recife, Ed. UFPE.
  • ________. (2000b). Being human: the problem of agency. Cambridge: CUP.
  • ________. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: CUP.
  • ________. (2007a). Making our way through the world: Human reflexi- vity and social mobility. Cambridge: CUP.
  • ________. (2007b) “The Long March with a Key Problem: Can Explana- tion and Understanding Be Linked?”. In Tahir Abbas e Frank Reeves (eds)...
  • ________.(2007c). “The trajectory of the morphogenetic approach: an account in the first-person. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, no. 54,...
  • ________.(2011). Habitus, reflexividade e realismo. Dados: Revista de
  • Ciências Sociais, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 54, no 1, pp. 157 a 206.
  • ________. (2012). The Reflexive Imperative in Late Modernity. Cam- bridge: CUP.
  • BADIOU, Alain (2004). Infinite Thought: Truth and the return to phi- losophy. Londres: Continuum.
  • BOURDIEU, Pierre (1990) In Other Words: essays towards a reflexive sociology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • ________. (1993). Sociology in Question. Londres: Sage.
  • BURKITT, Ian (2012) “Emotional Reflexivity: feeling, emotion and imagination in reflexive dialogues”. Sociology, 46 (3): 458-472.
  • CAMPBELL, Colin (1998). The Myth of Social Action. Cambridge: CUP.
  • COLAPIETRO, Vincent M. (1989). Peirce’s Approach to the Self: a se- miotic perspective on human subjectivity. Albany: State University of...
  • DAVEY, Nicholas (2006) Unquiet Understanding: Gadamer’s philoso- phical hermeneutics. Albany, State University of New York Press.
  • DREYFUS, Hubert (2004). Taylor’s anti-epistemology. In Ruth Abbey
  • (ed.) Charles Taylor. Cambridge: CUP.
  • ELDER-VASS, Dave (2007). “Reconciling Archer and Bourdieu”. So- ciological Theory, 25(4), pp. 325-346.
  • GADAMER, Hans-Georg (1976) Hegel’s Dialectic: five hermeneutical studies. Christopher Smith (trad.). New Haven e Londres: Yale Uni- versity...
  • ________. (1986) The Relevance of the Beautiful and Other Essays. Ni- cholas Walker (ed). Cambridge: CUP.
  • ________. (1996). The Enigma of Health: the art of healing in a scien- tific age. Stanford, Stanford University Press.
  • ________. (1998) Reason in the Age of Science. Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  • ________. (2000) Subjectivity and Intersubjectivity, Subject and Per- son. Continental Philosophy Review, 33, pp. 275-287.
  • ________. (2006). Truth and Method. Londres e Nova York: Continuum.
  • ________. (2007) The Gadamer Reader: a bouquet of the later writin- gs. Richard E. Palmer (ed.). Illinois: Northwestern University Press.
  • GJESDAL, Kristin (2009) Gadamer and the Legacy of German Idea- lism. Cambridge: CUP.
  • GRONDIN, Jean (2001). Play, Festival and Ritual in Gadamer: on the theme of the imemorial in his later Works. In Lawrence K. Schmidt (org.)...
  • HAMLIN, Cynthia Lins. (2000) “Realismo crítico: um programa de pesquisa para as ciências sociais”. Dados, 43 (2), Rio de Janeiro, pp.
  • -397.
  • HUDSON, P. A. (2006). The Concept of Subject in Laclau. Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies, 33 (3), Joanesburgo, pp.
  • -312.
  • HUNTINGTON, Patricia J. (1998). Ecstatic Subjects, Utopia, and Re- cognition: Kristeva, Heidgger and Irigaray. Albany: State University of...
  • KANT, Imannuel (1995). Foundations of the metaphysics of morals. Nova Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • KUSCH, Martin (1989). Language as Calculus vs Language as Univer- sal Medium: a study in Husserl, Heidegger and Gadamer. Dordrecht, Boston...
  • LACLAU, Ernesto, MOUFFE, Chantal (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: towards a radical democratic politics. Londres: Verso.
  • McNAY, Lois (1999). “Subject, Psyche and Agency: the work of Judith Butler”. Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 16(2): 175-93.
  • MEAD, George Herbert (1934). Mind, Self and Society: from the stan- dpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago e Londres: The University of Chicago...
  • MERLEAU-PONTY, Maurice (1990). Merleau-Ponty na Sorbonne: resumo de cursos psicossociologia e filosofia. Campinas: Papirus.
  • MOUZELIS, Nicos P. (2008) “Habitus and Reflexivity: reestructuring Bourdieu’s theory of practice. In: Modern and Postmodern Social The- orizing:...
  • PALMER, Richard (1969). Hermenêutica. Lisboa: Edições 70. PINKARD, Terry (2004). “Taylor, ‘History’, and the History of Philoso-
  • phy”. In: Ruth Abbey (ed.) Charles Taylor. Cambridge: CUP.
  • PIPPIN, Robert B. (2002) “Gadamer’s Hegel”. In Robert Dostal (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Gadamer. Cambridge: CUP.
  • PLESSNER, Helmuth (1995). Le Rire et le Pleurer: une ètude des li- mites du comportement humain. Paris: Fondation de la Maion des Sciences...
  • RECKWITZ, Andreas (2002). Toward a Theory of Social Practices A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory,...
  • SAYER, Andrew (2005) The Moral Significance of Class. Cambridge: CUP.
  • SHORT, Thomas (2007). Peirce’s theory of signs. Cambridge: CUP.
  • SIEGEL, Jerrold (2005). The Idea of the Self: Thought and experiment in Western Europe since the seventeenth century. Cambridge: CUP.
  • SWEETMAN, Paul (2003) Twenty-First Century Disease? Habitual Reflexivity or the Reflexive Habitus. The Sociological Review, 51(4):
  • -49.
  • TAYLOR, Charles (1985). Human agency and language: philosophi- cal papers I. Cambridge: CUP.
  • ________.(2005). As Fontes do Self: a construção da identidade moder- na. São Paulo: Edições Loyola.
  • TOURAINE, Alain (2005). The subject is coming back. International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society 18, pp.199–209.
  • VANDENBERGHE, Frédéric (2010) “Você sabe com quem está falando quando fala consigo mesmo?”. In: Teoria social realista: um diálogo franco-britânico....
  • ________.(2012) New directions in the theory of action. Rio de Janeiro, mimeo, IESP/UERJ.
  • ________.(2014) What is Critical about Critical Realism? Londres: Routledge. (No prelo)
  • VERENE, Donald P. (2007). Hegel’s Absolute: an introduction to rea- ding the Phenomenology of Spirit. Albany: State University of New York...
  • WILEY, Norbert (1994). The Semiotic Self. Cambridge e Oxford: Polity Press e Blackwell Publishers.
  • ________. (2010). “Inner Speech and Agency”. In: Margaret Archer (ed) Conversations about Reflexivity. Londres: Routledge.
  • .................
  • http://dx.doi.org/10.20336/rbs.76
  • DOI: 10.20336/rbs.76