Acceso usuarios
The case-law of the European Court of Human Rights on freedom of expression, albeit unsystematic and heterogeneous, can nevertheless be read through the lens of some conceptual frameworks, such as the general distinction between obligations of conduct and obligations of result, and the creature interpretation of international judges. From this perspective, the interaction between international law and domestic legal systems does not appear that difficult. In fact, in most cases, it is necessary to strike a balance between the supremacy of international law and the freedom of national orders to implement international obligations. This is the political side of international adjudication. This article will focus on the points of tension of this unstable relationship and the opposite expectations of both systems of law, in order to depict a rational framework which could meet both needs.
