La ley de derechos humanos bajo amenaza. El desafío a la ley de derechos humanos en el Reino Unido

• Davis, Howard ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad de Bournemouth
• Localización: Revista de derecho constitucional europeo, ISSN 1697-7890, Nº. 23 (La dimensión de la Administración Pública en el contexto de la globalización (IV).), 2015
• Idioma: español
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen
  • español

    Este trabajo aborda la controversia que se está produciendo en el Reino Unido tras la aprobación de la Human Rights Act, relativa a los efectos internos de la CEDH. En concreto, el autor se centra en la crítica proveniente del partido conservador, la magistratura y los académicos de izquierda, a la vez que las proyecta sobre determinados casos. Finalmente, analiza las soluciones de futuro.

  • English

    This paper goes through the controversy display in the United Kingdom after the enactment of the Human Rights Act, which governs the internal effects of the ECHR. The author takes account on the critics coming from the conservative party, the judges and leftist professors, showing the impact of these critics on singular cases. Finally, the paper analyzes the possible solutions.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • «Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza» , [2004] UKHL 30, 2004, párrafos 25-33.
  • T. HICKMAN, "Constitutional Dialogue, Constitutional Theories and the HRA", Public Law 306, 2005
  • A.L. YOUNG, Parliamentary Sovereignty and the HRA, Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2009, capítulos 5 & 6.
  • A. L. YOUNG, "Is dialogue working under the HRA?", Public Law 773, 2011.
  • «R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Simms 2 AC» 115, 131-2, 2000.
  • «Aston Cantlow v Wallbank UKHL 37» , párrafo 7, 2003.
  • Protecting Human Rights in the UK, Conservative Party, 2014. [Protegiendo los Derechos Humanos en el RU, Partido Conservador, 2014
  • Department for Constitutional Affairs, Review of the Implementation of the HRA 1996 , July 2006.
  • Human Rights Review 2012, Equality and Human Rights Commission, 2012.
  • G. MARSHALL, Constitutional Conventions, Oxford OUP, 1984, esp. Capítulo 1.
  • A. TOMKINS, Our Republican Constitution , Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2005, Chapter 1.
  • V. BOGDANOR, The New British Constitution, Oxford, Hart Publishing , 2009.
  • «NV.Algemene Transporten Expeditie Onderneming van Gend en Loos v Nederlandse Administratie der Belastingen», CMLR 105, 1963.
  • LORD HAILSHAM "Elective Dictatorship", The Listener 21 October 1976, p . 496-500.
  • Rawlings, R. "Parliamentary Sovereignty under the new constitutional hypothesis" Public Law, Autumn - 2006, p 562-580.
  • «Banco Mellat v HM Treasury» (2) UKSC 39, 2013
  • G. MARSHALL "The Constitution: Theory and Interpretation" En: V. BOGDONOR (ed) The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century ,...
  • «Morris v Beardmore AC» 446, 1981.
  • A. TOMKINS, Our Republican Constitution , Oxford, Hart Publishing, 2005.
  • G. Phillipson "The Legal Protection of Human Rights: Sceptical Essays", Public Law nº 380, 2012 (publicación revisada).
  • K. EWING, "The Futility of the HRA", Public Law, 2004, p. 828-852
  • K. EWING y J-C THAM, "The Continuing Futility of the HRA", Public Law p. 668-693.
  • «Othman v Demandado» SC /15/2005, párrafo 79.
  • «Immigration Act 1971, section 3(5)».
  • «R v Secretary of State for Home Affairs exparte Hosenball» 1 WLR 766, 1977.
  • «A v UK» 49 EHRR 29 [205], 2009.
  • «Chahal v UK» 23 EHRR 413, 1997, párrafo 144.
  • «Othman v Secretary of State for the Home Department» UKSC 10, 2010.
  • Othman v UK» 55 EHRR 1, 2012.
  • «R v Horncastle» UKSC 14, 2009
  • «Al-Khawaja v UK» 54 EHRR 23, 2012.
  • P.P. CRAIG , Public Law and Democracy in the UK and the USA , OUP, Oxford, 1991, Capítulo 1.
  • «Hirst v UK» 42 EHRR 41, 2006.
  • «Greens v United Kingdom» 53 EHRR 21, 2011.
  • «Sumption SCJ» in «R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice» UKSC 63, [2013] párrafo 135.
  • «Scoppola v Italia» (2013) 56 19 EHRR
  • «Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF» (3) [2010] 2 AC 269
  • «R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator» [2004] AC 323, párrafo 20.
  • Web de consulta 16 de noviembre 2014: https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/supreme-court-and-the-uks-legal-system.pdf https://www.supremecourt.uk/about/uk-judicial-system.html...
  • LORD SUMPTION (a serving Supreme Court Justice) "The Limits of Law", 27th Sultan Azlan Shah Lecture, Kuala Lumpur, 20 November 2013
  • LORD HOFFMANN "The Universality of Human Rights " Judicial Studies Board Annual Lecture , 19 March 2009.
  • «Manchester CC v Pinnock» [2010] UKSC 45, párrafo 48.
  • «Osborn v Parole Board» [2013] UKSC 61, párrafo 54-63.
  • «Al-Khawaja v UK» (2012) 54 EHRR 23.
  • «Parliament Acts 1911/1949»
  • « Jackson v Attorney General» [2005] UKHL 56.