La diversificación del poder en los Estados neopatrimonialistas de Asia central

• Rubén Ruiz Ramas ^[1]
  1. [1] Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

     Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia

     Madrid, España

     
• Localización: Boletín económico de ICE, Información Comercial Española, ISSN-e 2340-8804, ISSN 0214-8307, Nº 3063 (Del 1 al 31 de Mayo 2015: "Monográfico: Eurasia"), 2015, págs. 101-112
• Idioma: español
• DOI: 10.32796/bice.2015.3063.5471
• Enlaces
  • Texto completo
• Resumen

  • Tras más de dos décadas de experiencia postsoviética en Asia central, el continuum entre autoritarismo y democracia liberal no captura la heterogeneidad de trayectorias políticas existentes en la región. En consecuencia, los últimos años dejan una renovación teórica orientada, primero, a conocer con mayor profundidad los diferentes subtipos de autoritarismos y, segundo, a otorgar relevancia a las instituciones informales en Estados categorizados como neopatrimoniales. En este artículo se trabaja desde la perspectiva de la Construcción del Estado (Statebuilding) para distinguir en los Estados neopatrimoniales tres niveles de diversificación del poder basados en dos rasgos principales: la estructura estatal de toma de decisiones en el Gobierno central y el grado de fragmentación territorial del poder.

• Referencias bibliográficas
  • BALMACEDA, M. (2008). Energy Dependency, Politics and Corruption in the Former Soviet Union. Russia´s Power, Oligarchs´ Profits and Ukraine´s...
  • BRATTON, M. y VAN DE WALLE, N. (1997). Democratic Experiments in Africa. Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge...
  • CAROTHERS, T. (2002). «The End of the Transition Paradigm». Journal of Democracy, vol. 13, nº 1 (January), pp. 5-21.
  • COLLINS, K. (2006). Clan Politics and Regime Transition in Central Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • COLLINS, K. (2009). «Economic and Security Regionalism Among Patrimonial Authoritarian Regimes: The Case of Central Asia». Europe-Asia Studies,...
  • CUMMINGS, S. (2005). Kazakhstan: Power and Elite. London and New York: I. B. Tauris.
  • EISENSTADT, S. N. (1973). Traditional Patrimonialism and Modern Neopatrominialism. Londres, Beverly Hills/CA: Sage Publications.
  • ERDMANN, G. y ENGEL, U. (2006). «Neopatrimonialism Revisited Beyond a Catch-All Concept». GIGA Working Paper, nº 16. Hamburg: German Institute...
  • ERDMAN, G. (2012). «Neopatrimonialism: Problems of a Catch-All Concept». En Stewart, S. (ed). Presidents, Oligarchs and Bureaucrats: Forms...
  • FINKEL, E. (2012). «Democratization No more Colour! Authoritarian Regimes and Colour Revolutions in Eurasia». Democratization, vol. 19, nº1,...
  • FISUN A. (2007). «Postsovetskie Neopatrimonial' nye Rezhimy: Genezis, Osobennosti, Tipologija». Otechestvennye zapiski, nº 6.
  • GANEV, V. I. (2005). «Post-Communism as an Episode of State Building: A Reversed Tillyan Perspective». Communist and Post Communist Studies,...
  • GULIYEV, F. (2011). «Personal rule, Neopatrimonialism, and Regime Typologies: Integrating Dahlian and Weberian Approaches to Regime Studies»....
  • HALE, H. E. (2006).«Democracy or Autocracy on the March? The Colored Revolutions as Normal Dynamics of Patronal Presidentialism». Communist...
  • HALE, H. E. (2011). «Formal Constitutions in Informal Politics. Institutions and Democratization in Post-Soviet Eurasia». World Politics,...
  • ILJAMOV, A. (2007). «Neopatrimonialism, Interest Groups and Patronage Networks: the Impasses of the Governance System in Uzbekistan». Central...
  • JONES LUONG, P. (2002). Institutional Change and Political Continuity in Post-Soviet Central Asia: Power, Perceptions, and Pacts. Cambridge:...
  • JUNISBAI, B. (2010). «A Tale of Two Kazakhstans: Sources of Political Cleavage and Conflict in the Post-Soviet Period». Europe-Asia Studies,...
  • KONONENKO, V. y MOSHES, A. (2011). Russia as a Network State: What Works in Russia When State Institutions Do Not?. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • LEVITSKY, S. y WAY, L. (2010). Competitive Auhtoritarianism. Hybrid Regimes After the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • LEWIS, P. (1996). «From Predendalism to Predation: The Political Economy of Decline in Nigeria». The Journal of Modern African Studies, vol....
  • LEWIS, D. (2008). The Temptations of Tyranny in Central Asia. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • LIBMAN, A. (2009). «Government-Business Relations in Central Asia: Approaches to Comparative Analysis». Russian Studies, nº 5, pp. 57-70.
  • LYNCH, D. (2013). «Greed, Lust, War and Peace: The 2012 Battle for Khorog, Tajikistan». Paper presented at the ASN World Convention. Columbia...
  • MÉDARD, J. F. (1982). «The Underdeveloped State in Tropical Africa: Political Clientelism or Neo-Patrimonialism?», In: Clapham, C. (ed.)....
  • MØLLER, J. y SKAANING, S. (2010). «PostCommunist Regime Types: Hierarchies Across Attributes and Space». Communist and PostCommunist Studies,...
  • MURPHY, J. (2006). «Illusory Transition Elite Reconstruction in Kazakhstan». Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 58, nº 4, pp. 523-554.
  • OSTROWSKI, W. (2009). «The Legacy of the 'Coloured Revolutions': The Case of Kazakhstan». Journal of Communist Studies and Transition...
  • OSTROWSKI, W. (2010). Politics and Oil in Kazakhstan. London: Routledge.
  • PITCHER, A.; MORAN, M. y JOHNSTON, M. (2009). «Rethinking Patrimonialism and Neopa trimo nialism in Africa». African Studies Review, vol....
  • RADNITZ, S. (2006). «What Really Happened in Kyrgyzstan?». Journal of Democracy, vol. 17, nº 2, pp. 132-146.
  • RUIZ RAMAS, R. (2012). «The Institutional Persistence of Patrimonialism in the Kyrgyz Republic: Testing a Path Dependency (1991- 2010)». En...
  • SATPAEV, D. (2007).«An Analysis of the Internal Structure of Kazakhstan's Political Elite and an Assessment of Political Risk Levels»....
  • SCHATZ, E. (2004). Modern Clan Politics: The Power of 'Blood' in Kazakhstan and Beyond. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • SNYDER, R. (1992). «Explaining Transitions from Neopatrimonial Dictatorships». Comparative Politics, vol. 24, nº 4, pp. 379-400.
  • STEWART, S. (2012). Presidents, Oligarchs and Bureaucrats: Forms of Rule in the Post-Soviet Space. London: Ashgate Publishing.
  • TILLY, C. (1975). «Western-State Making and Theories of Political Transformation». The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton:...
  • TUNÇER-KILAVUZ, I. (2011). «Understanding Civil War: A Comparison of Tajikistan and Uzbekistan». Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 63, nº 2, pp. 263-290.
  • WILSON, A. (2005). Virtual Politics. Faking Democracy in the Post-Soviet World. London: Yale University Press.